They got the wrong person 512


There are many thousands of people imprisoned in Uzbekistan alone who should not be imprisoned and who suffer much worse conditions than even the genuine horrors of Wandsworth being visited on Julian Assange. But the Assange case has implications for ever deteriorating Western freedoms which should not be overlooked.

Then there are many war criminals who ought to be in jail and who are not. Most prominent of these are Bush, Blair, Cheney, Straw and their crew. A minor figurewho ought to be in jail is Anna Ardin. Here are two tweets she published after being “raped” by Julian Assange:

‘Julian wants to go to a crayfish party, anyone have a couple of available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’

‘Sitting outdoors at 02:00 and hardly freezing with the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing! #fb’

She subsequently deleted and tried to expunge those. I doff my hat to Rixstep:

http://rixstep.com/1/20101001,01.shtml

For another avowed feminist trying to bring Assange down, analyse the use of language in this article by the Guardian’s useless Helen Piddle. For a worm like her to use words like bizarre and raggle-taggle in relation to John Pilger really defies rationality.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/08/julian-assange-celebrity-supporters


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

512 thoughts on “They got the wrong person

1 13 14 15 16 17 18
  • Julian_Assange

    Julian_Ass

    Off to a party tonight, it’s fancy dress. I’m going as me. I can’t disguise the TRUTH!

  • Julian_Assange

    Julian_Ass Julian Assange

    Mum just came in and gave me a cup of tea. Told her Marge next door said her hair looked shit. She needed to know.

  • dreoilin

    ‘Seven Thoughts on Wikileaks’

    by Jack Goldsmith, Law professor + ex-Bush Justice Department official

    http://www.lawfareblog.com/2010/12/seven-thoughts-on-wikileaks/

    which includes lastly:

    “The wikileaks saga gives the lie to the claim of United States omnipotence over the naming and numbering system via ICANN. Even assuming the United States could order ICANN (through its contractual arrangements and de facto control) to shut down all wikileaks sites (something that is far from obvious), ICANN could not follow through because its main leverage over unwanted wikileaks websites is its threat to de-list top-level domain names where the wikileaks sites appear. It is doubtful that ICANN could make that threat credibly for many reasons, including (a) the sites are shifting across top-level domains too quickly, (b) ICANN is not going to shut down a top-level domain to get at a handful of sites, and (c) alternative and perhaps root-splitting DNS alternatives might arise if it did.”

  • somebody

    How outrageous that the Chelsea and Westminster had planned to only take in police casualties. Who decided that? It was only because the ambulance driver made a fuss that Archie Meadows was treated urgently. His mother on video here.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bsnt2A_m2TU&feature=player_embedded

    PS

    Defiant Charles and Camilla: We won’t be cowed. a headline in one of tomorrow’s papers.

    Two fascist types reviewing the papers on BBC News are saying that water cannons need to be employed.

  • Ruth

    This is the most logical article on WikiLeaks I’ve read to date

    ‘If We Lose our Internet Freedoms Because of Wikileaks, You Should At Least Know Why’

    by Scott Creighton

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22371

    And here’s an extract from it:

    ‘It’s unfortunate what is going to happen. We all know it. We all see it. At some point that 256 character encryption code is going to be released and all of those wanna-be hackers will busily work to decode the 1.6 gig file they downloaded from all those bit torrent sites. Of course the files are unredacted, as has already been made clear by Mr. assange himself, and the end result will obviously be that some U.S. agent in Pakistan or Somalia or even Yemen will be disclosed and killed. At that point, the Obama administration will have no choice but to shut down thousands of websites (they just ran a BETA test for that last month shutting down 70 all at once) for “national security” reasons. Once that happens, they will of course have to pass a net neutrality bill that allows for licensing requirements for hosting websites which will mean only government approved sites will be allowed and they will be constantly monitored, for the public good of course. And thus, all those troubling “conspiracy theory” sites will be gone and Cass Sunstein can sleep better at night.’

  • Ruth

    This is the most logical article on WikiLeaks I’ve read to date

    ‘If We Lose our Internet Freedoms Because of Wikileaks, You Should At Least Know Why’

    by Scott Creighton

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22371

    And here’s an extract from it:

    ‘It’s unfortunate what is going to happen. We all know it. We all see it. At some point that 256 character encryption code is going to be released and all of those wanna-be hackers will busily work to decode the 1.6 gig file they downloaded from all those bit torrent sites. Of course the files are unredacted, as has already been made clear by Mr. assange himself, and the end result will obviously be that some U.S. agent in Pakistan or Somalia or even Yemen will be disclosed and killed. At that point, the Obama administration will have no choice but to shut down thousands of websites (they just ran a BETA test for that last month shutting down 70 all at once) for “national security” reasons. Once that happens, they will of course have to pass a net neutrality bill that allows for licensing requirements for hosting websites which will mean only government approved sites will be allowed and they will be constantly monitored, for the public good of course. And thus, all those troubling “conspiracy theory” sites will be gone and Cass Sunstein can sleep better at night.’

  • tony_opmoc

    If they had ever had any doubts before…They Knew when the Bass Player Broke His String…

    What Happens Next…???

    Well The Bass Player Might Have Stopped – and Everyone In The Band Looks Shocked – Such A Thing Has Never Happenned Before – Well Not In Living Memory…

    Bass Strings are Really THICK

    They are Made of Metal and They Don’t Break

    So The Band Might Have Thought They Had Stopped – Because They Couldn’t Function Without The Bass Player

    So We Just Sung LOUDER – until He Changed Guitar…

    And I could see the Tears In The Eyes of The Faces of The Musicians…

    They Already Knew

    The Best Audience In The World

    That’s Us

    And so after the gig – and we were talking about the Student Riots

    I said before you to to sleep look at the photographs in frames on the walls of the Bedroom where You are Sleeping

    That our Daughter Took at The G20 Riots when she was 18 years old…

    She was right on the frontline dressed as Press Photographer…

    Chatting Up The Riot Police In Their Heavy Gear – and The Protestors With Their Sunflowers

    She was The Dividing Line

    And Both Sides Looked At Each Other

    And Thought Oh Fuck

    We Can’t Beat The Shit Out Of Each Other Now

    She Might Get Hurt

    What Did Your Daughter Do When She Was 18 Years Old?

    Tony

  • tony_opmoc

    If they had ever had any doubts before…They Knew when the Bass Player Broke His String…

    What Happens Next…???

    Well The Bass Player Might Have Stopped – and Everyone In The Band Looks Shocked – Such A Thing Has Never Happenned Before – Well Not In Living Memory…

    Bass Strings are Really THICK

    They are Made of Metal and They Don’t Break

    So The Band Might Have Thought They Had Stopped – Because They Couldn’t Function Without The Bass Player

    So We Just Sung LOUDER – until He Changed Guitar…

    And I could see the Tears In The Eyes of The Faces of The Musicians…

    They Already Knew

    The Best Audience In The World

    That’s Us

    And so after the gig – and we were talking about the Student Riots

    I said before you to to sleep look at the photographs in frames on the walls of the Bedroom where You are Sleeping

    That our Daughter Took at The G20 Riots when she was 18 years old…

    She was right on the frontline dressed as Press Photographer…

    Chatting Up The Riot Police In Their Heavy Gear – and The Protestors With Their Sunflowers

    She was The Dividing Line

    And Both Sides Looked At Each Other

    And Thought Oh Fuck

    We Can’t Beat The Shit Out Of Each Other Now

    She Might Get Hurt

    What Did Your Daughter Do When She Was 18 Years Old?

    Tony

  • tony_opmoc

    Copied and Pasted From America

    Because It Seems I have Been Banned From Posting Anything In The UK, I thought I would share the last 24 hours with my American Friends

    Julian Assange Didn’t Turn Up

    But The Christmas Tree is Absolutely ENORMOUS

    And I was Totally Outrageous In My Behaviour

    Cuddling and Chatting Up The Most Beautiful Girls From All Over The World

    Who Turned Up at Her Party…

    But The Most Beautiful Girl Dancing To Stevie Wonder

    Was My Wife…

    She Said Come On

    Dance With Me

    And So I Did

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

    Tony

  • Anonymous

    You’re disgusting, Craig Murray.

    Disgusting filth. I once looked up to you. Now I know you’re just plain crazy.

  • tony_opmoc

    Its really hard to try and explain this thing to these people who live in America…

    They have got their Girls in Their Hollywood Films….

    And Yes I Tried The Rest Of England…

    It wasn’t that I was doing a rating thing or anything….

    Yes I Tried YORKSHIRE

    But The LANCASHIRE Girls

    Didn’t Suggest I Should Pull It Out

    So I Didn’t

    Tony

  • tony_opmoc

    At the time when you are doing it – you don’t realise you are doing it…

    Sure you may have actually got the job…

    And you don’t think about that….

    You just fucking do it…

    If they actually gave you the job – because you really wanted it – but…

    Well You Don’t Think About It

    You Just Do The Best Job You Can…

    And Then The Team Of You – 24 People…

    Work Our Bollocks Off – Over 3 Years – To Turn The Entire Thing Around

    Sometimes working 15 hour days for weeks

    To make it work

    And we do make it work

    And sure well

    Yes But I wasn’t Personally Invited

    But we did it it…

    And They Got The Queens Award For Industry…

    And We Smiled at Them…

    And They Asked Us To Do More

    We TOLD THEM TO

    FUCK OFF

    Once in a Lifetime

    Or maybe two or three times

    But not to order

    These things happen when the time is right

    I Vote Harry For King

    Cos I Reckon He Has Got His Mum’s Sense Of Humour and His Dad is Still Alive

    Has He Got a Girlfriend or is He Gay – Like The Rest Of Them???

    Tony

  • CheebaCow

    Ruth I read the article you linked to. It contains many ‘facts’ but doesn’t really understand these facts in a proper context. For example a large amount of space is dedicated to the PR man with close links to Murdoch, Phillip Adams. It is clear the author has no idea who Phillip Adams really is and what the Australian media is like. Adams worked in advertising sure (creating 2 iconic public health campaigns), but the article does not recognise the strong role Adams has played in Australia’s political and cultural scene. Just read the guys wiki page to see how involved he has been in TV, film, politics (traditional Labor left, not this neo-con bullshit now) and science. The author also fails to grasp that virtually every commentator in Australia has written for The Australian newspaper. The association is only ‘curious’ if you don’t know who Phillip Adams is.

    The article also makes a link between the fact that wikileaks and a completely separate CIA project that is using wiki functionality. It completely ignores the fact that the CIA project was announced at the time everyone was jumping on the wiki bandwagon. Also the link means nothing, it is not really a link at all. Countless sites use wiki functionality, it is useful, but it implies absolutely nothing about any relationship the sites have with each other. It’s like saying a the CIA has connections to the local primary school because both organisations use computers. A wiki is simply technology, anyone can use it.

    The whole Cass Sunstein section doesn’t warrant much comment. That logic can be equally applied to any site we ‘feel’ isn’t right. It isn’t real logic, rather it is false logic to confirm already held opinions.

    BTW why would Time magazine mention that WL is rumoured to be a CIA front if the whole point of the Time article is to lend credibility to WL and deny that WL is a front? Time could have easily ignored the rumour. Oh btw the rumour was started by John Young. Young has changed his mind many times about WL, I don’t think what he says can be taken as gospel.

    “It’s unfortunate what is going to happen. We all know it. We all see it. At some point that 256 character encryption code is going to be released”

    That’s a mighty big assumption, how about we wait a little and see how it plays out.

  • tony_opmoc

    You See My Wife and I Come From Lancashire in The North Of England

    In The County of Lancashire

    There Are The Towns Of

    Oldham and Skelmersdale

    Oldham is Near Manchester

    And Skelmersdale is Near Liverpool

    But She Doesn’t Speak Scouse

    She Speaks Lancashire Just Like Me and The Rest of Lancashire

    But The Scousers Have a Great Sense Of Humour…

    And We Actually Get On With Them Reasonably O.K.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

    I Give It To The AUSSIES

    Such COURAGE

    Overwhelms Me

    Come On Then You Fucking TWATS

    http://georgiebc.wordpress.com/

    Ghoul Directory

    Posted on December 5, 2010 by georgiebc

    Death to Julian Assange, his offspring, the Wikileaks board, all of us, the internet, etc. Contrary to what these clowns have learned from video games and Hollywood, most countries do have laws. And public opinion works both ways. This is a list of the ghouls and it will soon contain what can be done about them. Sadly, I expect it to grow faster than the NOD. While reading this sickening post, please keep in mind that no one associated with Wikileaks has broken any laws, and Wikileaks’ work over the past four years has caused no physical harm to anyone. If the world ever needed a more pure indication of how long and how much the world’s media has been lying, take a look at what happens when a media organization tells the truth.

    Bob Beckel

    “A dead man can’t leak stuff. This guy’s a traitor, a treasonist and has broken every law of the United States. I’m not for the death penalty and if I’m not for the death penalty there’s only one way to do it, illegally shoot the son of a bitch.”

    Bo Dietl (Beau Dietl & Associates)

    Agrees with Bob Beckel, making shooting sounds with imaginary gun like a four year old on national TV. “Obama, if you’re listening today, you should take this guy out, have the CIA take him out.”

    Tom Flanagan

    Former Harper adviser, former US draft dodger, who now wants Obama to send a drone after Julian Assange as his personal form of Viagra. After watching the show a woman sent Flanagan an email protesting and received a one line answer saying “Better be careful, we know where you live.” For those not familiar with this former advisor to prime minister Stephen Harper, he was also responsible for one of the most revolting moments in recent Canadian politics when he attempted to bribe independent MP Chuck Cadman to vote with the conservatives by offering Cadman, who was dying of cancer, a million dollar life insurance policy for his family. It was turned down.

    Update: Charges filed against Tom Flanagan. University of Calgary is doing nothing about a professor making death threats on national television while continuing to persecute students for posting feedback about a professor on facebook. Have a petition.

    Newt Gingrich

    “We should treat (Assange) as an enemy combatant, and as an absolute enemy of the United States.”

    “And no one from WikiLeaks should feel comfortable the rest of their lives. These are bad people doing bad things, and they’re gonna get Americans and our allies killed. And we should recognize that, and recognize that it is in effect an act of war against the United

    Jonah Goldberg

    “Why wasn’t Assange garroted in his hotel room years ago?”

    States.”

    Kimberly Guilfoyle

    “If we can find a way to get him to come to the United States we can take matters into our own hands.”

    “Jonolan”

    (on twitter @DarkOgham, myspace.com/jonolan1967)

    Assange “has at least one acknowledged son, Daniel Assange, who lives something close to normal life in Australia and who is easy to find and equally easy to harm either physically, legally, or economically. Physical harm would be best.”

    “That’s makes Julian Assange vulnerable and quite “touchable.” Threaten his child and it’s an odds-on bet that he’ll let himself be taken and that, once in custody, he’ll divulge the information needed to eliminate the rest of his cell. Even if he won’t surrender voluntarily, credibly threatening or taking his son should rattle him enough to cause him to err and be an easier target.”

    Update: Now this blog has been updated with:

    CENSORED]

    Some of the “people” that have been defending Assange’s “freedom of speech” have complained to my hosting provider in such a manner that I have been forced to censor / redact this post.

  • tony_opmoc

    Ironic isn’t it?

    Some of them found my statements profoundly disturbing and were frightened by the thought that they might cause someone harm. In response they had me silenced by the most efficient methods at their disposal.

    Actually, they proved my point and validated my opinion of what should be done, as did various deleted death threats against my family and I (all reported to US Agencies and agencies of their own nations).

    [/CENSORED]

    Earlier Daniel Assange had added this comment:

    somnidea Says:

    December 3rd, 2010 at 9:56 am

    Why must people use such terrible, terrible photos? Look! I have pretty sparkly purikura!: http://www.facebook.com/somnid

    As to the content… hmm. I’m not sure my father is the sort of man to submit to such dastardly tactics. I haven’t spoken to him in three years, so there’s certainly no immediate emotional connection to be preyed upon. Even if it were effective, I suspect that Wikileaks has now reached a point where it simply cannot be permanently destroyed. Now that the concept has been demonstrated, I expect another organization would rise in its place even if my father and everyone he knows were to be silenced. Technology as a force for social change is extremely difficult to suppress.

    And received in response:

    jonolan Says:

    December 3rd, 2010 at 10:57 am

    Mr. Assange,

    Believe me or not at your own whim, but I actually bear you no malice whatsoever; you would just seem to be useful tool to reach your father if your father proved difficult to track and pin down or if he failed to cooperate.

    If it is as you say that putting pressure upon you would not be an effective lever, then I see no point in any nation’s military or intelligence community doing. Hopefully, if you are both honest and correct in your claim, they already know this and have come to the same conclusion.

    As to the photo quality ?” it was the only one I could find. Post a better one on your FB and I’ll use it instead. 😉

    As to Wikileaks ?” Removal of key personnel and informants / contributors would be quite effective in quelling such things. The tech is sound and pervasive, but the content and content “contributors” can be controlled or culled as needed for national interests.

    Addendum: You do have a loyal following of “twits.” Ironically though, many of them are calling for my being silenced through one set of measures or another.

    They seem to think that the limit of Free Speech is when it harms people or says that agents of a government should do so…

    I wonder what your father would think of that. 😉

    Update 2: See comments.

    John Hawkins

    “In Assange’s case, he’s not an American and so he has no constitutional protection. … Can we do anything legally about someone from another country leaking this information? Maybe not. Can we have a CIA agent with a sniper rifle rattle a bullet around his skull the next time he appears in public as a warning? You bet we can ?” and we should. If that’s too garish for people, then the CIA can kill him and make it look like an accident.”

    Peter King

    ‘asked the Obama administration today to “determine whether WikiLeaks could be designated a foreign terrorist organization,” putting the group in the same company as al-Qaeda and Aum Shinrikyo, the Japanese cult that released deadly sarin gas on the Tokyo subway.’

    That’s this Peter King, IRA promoter. “The risk is that broader discussion of domestic support for foreign terrorism would lead to greater media attention for his history with the IRA support network. King claims that truth is terrorism: worse, even, than the killing of innocent American citizens. One has to wonder who here is the terrified party, and why.”

    Charles Krauthammer

    “Think creatively. … Franklin Roosevelt had German saboteurs tried by military tribunal and executed. Assange has done more damage to the United States than all six of those Germans combined. Putting U.S. secrets on the Internet, a medium of universal dissemination new in human history, requires a reconceptualization of sabotage and espionage ?” and the laws to punish and prevent them. Where is the Justice Department?

    “And where are the intelligence agencies on which we lavish $80 billion a year? Assange has gone missing. Well, he’s no cave-dwelling jihadi ascetic. Find him. Start with every five-star hotel in England and work your way down.

    “Want to prevent this from happening again? Let the world see a man who can’t sleep in the same bed on consecutive nights, who fears the long arm of American justice. I’m not advocating that we bring out of retirement the KGB proxy who, on a London street, killed a Bulgarian dissident with a poisoned umbrella tip. But it would be nice if people like Assange were made to worry every time they go out in the rain.”

    William Kristol

    Title is “Whack Wikileaks”. (I love all the tough guy euphemisms for murder these guys come up with behind their desks, in their little cubicles.)

    “It’s hard to see why Thiessen isn’t right. Why can’t we act forcefully against WikiLeaks? Why can’t we use our various assets to harass, snatch or neutralize Julian Assange and his collaborators, wherever they are? Why can’t we disrupt and destroy WikiLeaks in both cyberspace and physical space, to the extent possible? Why can’t we warn others of repercussions from assisting this criminal enterprise hostile to the United States?”

    “Acting together to degrade, defeat, and destroy WikiLeaks should be the first topic discussed at today’s White House meeting between the president and the congressional leadership.”

    Jeffrey T. Kuhner

    “Assassinate Assange” was the title. “The world is witnessing the absurd, almost surreal spectacle of the American superpower standing helpless in the face of a lone hacker.” Jeffrey needs to meet Anonymous, JA’s imaginary friends.

    Bill O’Reilly

    “If we catch you, we’re going to hang you.” etc., etc., etc.

    Don Laird (commenter)

    “Julian Assange, his assistants, staff and those who have provided Assange with administrative, logistical, operational and financial support and should, using the mechanisms and resources of their own intelligence and military infrastructures, with a sense of extreme prejudice, unmistakable permanence and finality render the same completely unable to continue their murderous crusade.

    “Let the silence that follows the neutralization of Julian Assange, his staff and his co-conspirators speak volumes to the enlightened socialist academia, liberal intelligencia and those sneering, malicious self appointed bringers of “clarity and truth” remaining who toy with the idea of dabbling in what is nothing more than a treasonous, seditious exercise in self gratification wrapped in the robes of the self righteous.

    “The sooner, the bloodier, the better.”

    email is: [email protected] IP is: 142.179.237.89 Bonnyville, Alberta

    Update: This one added the following comment to the post at Zero Anthropology:

    Don Laird permalink

    5 December 2010 8:28 pm

    Max Forte,

    Your repeated references to my post are transparent, attempts to provoke a response. These repeated references in addition to revelations regarding email addresses and IP addresses. So I will respond with this.

    Firstly, your readers will be rather amused at your “outing” of my email address, which troubles me not but may trouble them from several stand points. This will also no doubt be noted by your coworkers and students, to your considerable disadvantage.

    Secondly, is the remarkable similarity between the difficulties, a tempest in a teacup, facing Professor Tom Flanagan of the University of Calgary and you, an associate professor of Concordia University. Both are men who have made public statements advocating violence and murder, “should be assassinated” and your little quip, “then we all call for your fucking little head to be cut off and flushed down the toilet”. Both will, as a result of their indiscretion, suffer a withering scrutiny of their remarks by both the president of the university and its board of trustees.

    There is no ambiguity in your incitement to decapitate me. This will be of significant concern for your coworkers, fellow professors, students, students parents and your superiors. In addition, considering your affection for decapitation and radical islam, I am certain this will be of interest to the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service as well as the RCMP. Perhaps you hadn’t noticed that radical muslims and radical muslim sympathizers are not terribly popular in Canada.

    Understand very clearly Mr. Forte, parents of students in attendance at Concordia University are made most uncomfortable by university professors who, in close proximity to their children, advocate and promote the sort of violence you have today. This is something that is also not lost on your employers and your coworkers who, as you suffer your own consequences, will no doubt distance themselves from you.

    You may try to dismiss your gaffe as a “passionate moment” but rest assured Mr. Forte, considering your proximity to Ecole Poly Technique and the massacre of the young women there at the hands of an unbalanced murderous student, there are many who will be most uncomfortable knowing they and their students are walking the halls with a very unstable man. Your avocation of violence and murder is a breech of trust with your students and employers and no doubt this will be viewed in the same light by the community at large.

    Most Sincerely,

    Don Laird

    Adrian Lamo

    Still desperately seeking attention, after already ensuring his name in history’s most despised. Twitter name 6. Drop him a tweet.

    Ezra Levant

    “Why is Assange still alive? … WikiLeaks could have its assets seized, just like the Taliban has. And U.S. President Barack Obama could do what he’s doing to the Taliban throughout the world.

    “He doesn’t sue them or catch them. He kills them. Because it’s war.

    “Obama has even ordered the assassination of an American citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki.

    “How does Obama see Assange any differently?”

    Mitch McConnell

    (US Republican Senate leader) “Congress should change the law if necessary to pursue the 39-year-old Australian.”, “I think the man is a high-tech terrorist.”

    Joel Mowbray

    “He’s a blackmail extortionist terrorist.”

    Sarah Palin

    (reality TV star) “Hunt down the WikiLeaks chief like Taliban”, “He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al-Qaida and Taliban leaders?” Unintentional hilarity: Palin copies Jonah Goldberg’s “serious question”, but both of them are answering Assange. He asks the world to look at the “serious questions” he puts in front of them, they say the serious question is why is he alive?

    Rick Santorum

    The “founder of the WikiLeaks website should be prosecuted as a terrorist”.

    Marc Thiessen

    “Assange is a non-U.S. citizen operating outside the territory of the United States. This means the government has a wide range of options for dealing with him. It can employ not only law enforcement but also intelligence and military assets to bring Assange to justice and put his criminal syndicate out of business.”

    “the FBI may use its statutory authority to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if the FBI’s actions contravene customary international law” and that an “arrest that is inconsistent with international or foreign law does not violate the Fourth Amendment.” In other words, we do not need permission to apprehend Assange or his co-conspirators anywhere in the world.”

    Christian Whiton

    “1. Indict Mr. Assange and his colleagues for espionage, regardless of whether he is presently in a U.S. jurisdiction, and ask our allies to do the same.

    2. Explore opportunities for the president to designate WikiLeaks and its officers as enemy combatants, paving the way for non-judicial actions against them.

    3. Freeze the assets of the WikiLeaks organization and its supporters, and sanction financial organizations working with this terrorist-enabling organization so they cannot clear transactions denominated in U.S. dollars.

    4. Give the new U.S. Cyber-Command a chance to prove its worth by ordering it to electronically assault WikiLeaks and any telecommunications company offering its services to this organization.”

    Accountability

    Australia: s.11.4(1) of the Criminal Code : inciting a crime is illegal.

    Canada: Section 22 (counselling or aiding or abetting culpable homicide when an actual crime has been committed) and Section 464 (the same but re a crime not yet committed).

    JA’s imaginary friends: Anonymous

    Regarding the updated post and comment: Do you believe these two? Sit and complacently order up murder from behind a computer screen and cry like babies when they are called on it? Janolin cries about having to redact something that would harm a person he supposedly wants to harm to get back at someone for supposedly not redacting enough. Don Laird deplores violent threats.

    Obviously, persons of very little intelligence who see the talking heads on TV doing something think it’s perfectly ok for them to do it too. Time to address the talking heads on TV.

    Tony

  • CheebaCow

    A Prostate & Bareback –

    Weird that you should raise other peoples sexuality when you guys clearly have the most homoerotic usernames on the site. The way you guys keep patting each other on the back, it’s like watching the volleyball scene in Top Gun. Which one is Cruise and which one Kilmer?

  • angrysoba

    Wow! The persecution complex at the centre of Alfred’s meltdown is a thing to behold.

    I can’t say anything without being attacked, he bawls!

    What a crybaby!

    Almost everything I post here is at stark odds with the majority of other posters here.

    Do you see me crying and bawling?

    No! Maybe my language can become a touch ribald when I am frustrated by crazy 9/11 kooks, such as yourself Alfred, but I don’t need to repeatedly change my handle or whine about being a victim of bigotry! LOL!

  • somebody

    Shame that I had to scroll through the yards of Opmoc rubbish to see what Ruth and Cheeba Cow had said. I fear for his health.

    This is what Desmond’s Daily Express has for a headline today. Guilty even before charged?

    STUDENT FEES DEMO FACES OF HATE

    These people are wanted by police for questioning

    Sunday December 12,2010

    By James Murray

    SCOTLAND YARD last night

  • angrysoba

    “This is what Desmond’s Daily Express has for a headline today. Guilty even before charged?”

    Next you’ll be telling me that the Express is some kind of sensationalist tabloid rag. That is if WikiLeaks don’t beat you to it.

  • Steelback

    You shower of adolescent numpties!

    Went totally OT overnight again. Evidently Art had an identity crisis and started blubbering! He’s more upset now than he was when Jimmy Goldsmith popped his clogs!

    Shouldn’t surprise anyone that angritwat reads the Express! What a prick!

    You lot are a bunch of saddoes whose intellectual inadequacies are obviously causing you a great deal of personal unhappiness.

    The pathetic OT inanities you re-cycle on this comment board daily make it painfully obvious that you have so far only managed to conceive the exterior world about you in absurdly impressionistic terms.

    Whether you are paid-up disinformationists or just PLAIN THICK is not clear. The fact that the real world has passed you is transparent.

  • dreoilin

    “Do you see me crying and bawling?”

    Fair dues, Angry.

    Suhayl, I think there was an email ‘warning’ with a reference to Sweden getting out of Afghanistan. Initial reports made me think of Assange, but that’s unlikely I imagine …

1 13 14 15 16 17 18

Comments are closed.