Bliar: How Much Death Can One Man Want? 93


I presume that serial killers become addicted. The really big killers, like Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot appear figures divorced from humanity. I really do find it hard to know what to make of Tony Blair. Universally execrated for fabricating the evidence to attack Iraq, apostle of war everywhere, Israel’s most ardent supporter, I used to think the desire for personal wealth – which his murderous career has indeed brought – was his primary motivation. But with his latest cheerleading for yet more wars, it seems he is indeed one of those who, having thrown off conventional morality in favour of homicide, just wants to go on and on with it.

For Bliar, the desire for killing will never stop.


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

93 thoughts on “Bliar: How Much Death Can One Man Want?

1 2 3 4
  • Tom Welsh

    “This is really not true at all. In fact it is pretty much nonsense”.

    And then you go on to talk about completely different matters. You gave not one single fact or number to show that what I said was untrue. That would be impossible, because it is all cold hard fact.

  • angrysoba

    You gave not one single fact or number to show that what I said was untrue. That would be impossible, because it is all cold hard fact.

    .
    Okay let’s make it easy for you:
    .
    The great irony is that Hitler showed far greater loyalty to his ally than the USA to Britain.
    .
    The US had no formal treaty with the UK so how could the US show loyalty to a non-existence alliance?
    .
    Most of the Nazis – probably including Hitler – didn’t think very highly of the Japanese (who were decidedly not Aryan), but nevertheless when the Japanese attacked the USA he immediately backed them up.
    .
    Germany went to war with the US because the US was blasting the German submarines that were attacking convoys to the UK. This was mentioned in the actual declaration.
    .
    Contrast that with the USA, which remained steadfastly neutral for the first two years and three months of WW2, watching calmly while the Germans conquered Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Holland, France, Yugoslavia, Greece… and reached the Moscow tramlines.
    .
    There was nothing calm about it. The issue caused furious debate in the US.
    .
    The Americans, contrary to what they will often tell you nowadays, had no problem standing by with arms folded during the Battle of France, the Battle of Britain, and the Blitz. They did nothing to help us, except to sell us whatever we wanted and they could spare – for ready cash till Britain was bankrupt, and for military technology, overseas bases, and credit thereafter.
    .
    It is a contradiction to say that the US did nothing to help us except sell us whatever we wanted, is it not?

1 2 3 4

Comments are closed.