The mainstream media for the most part has moved on. But there are a few more gleanings to be had, of perhaps the most interesting comes from the Daily Mirror, which labels al-Hilli an extremist on the grounds that he was against the war in Iraq, disapproved of the behaviour of Israel and had doubts over 9/11 – which makes a great deal of the population “extremist”. But the Mirror has the only mainstream mention I can find of the possibility that Mossad carried out the killings. Given Mr al-Hilli’s profession, the fact he is a Shia, the fact he had visited Iran, and the fact that Israel heas been assassinating scientists connected to Iran’s nuclear programme, this has to be a possibility. There are of course other possibilities, but to ignore that one is ludicrous.
Which leads me to the argument of Daily Mail crime reporter, Stephen Wright, that the French police should concentrate on the idea that this was a killing by a random Alpine madman or racist bigot. Perfectly possible, of course, and the anti-Muslim killings in Marseille might be as much a precedent as Mossad killings of scientists. But why the lone madman idea should be the preferred investigation, Mr Wright does not explain. What I did find interesting from a man who has visited many crime scenes are his repeated insinuations that the French authorities are not really trying very hard to find who the killers were, for example:
the crime scene would have been sealed off for a minimum of seven to ten days, to allow detailed forensic searches for DNA, fibres, tyre marks and shoe prints to take place.
Nearby bushes and vegetation would have been searched for any discarded food and cigarette butts left by the killer, not to mention the murder weapon.
But from what I saw at the end of last week, no such searches had taken place and potentially vital evidence could have been missed. House to house inquiries in the local area had yet to be completed and police had not made specific public appeals for information about the crime. No reward had been put up for information about the shootings.
Behind the scenes, what other short cuts have been taken? Have police seized data identifying all mobile phones being used in the vicinity of the murders that day?
The idea that the French authorities – who are quite as capable as any other of solving cases – are not really trying very hard is an interesting one.
Which leads me to this part of a remarkable article from the Daily Telegraph, which if true points us back towards a hit squad and discounts the ides that there was only one gun:
Claims that only one gun was used to kill everybody is likely to be disproved by full ballistics test results which are out in October.
While the 25 spent bullet cartridges found at the scene are all of the same kind, they could in fact have come from a number of weapons of the same make.
This throws up the possibility of a well-equipped, highly-trained gang circling the car and then opening fire.
Both children were left alive by the killers, who had clinically pumped bullets into everybody else, including five into Mr Mollier.
Zainab was found staggering around outside the car by Brett Martin, a British former RAF serviceman who cycled by moments after the attack, but he saw nobody except the schoolgirl.
Her sister, Zeena, was found unscathed and hiding in the car eight hours later.
Both sisters are now back in Britain, and are believed to have been reunited at a secret location near London.
There are of course a number of hit squad options, both governmental and private, which might well involve iraqi or Iranian interests – on both of which the mainstream media have been very happy to speculate while almost unanimously ignoring Israel.
But what interests me is why the Daily Telegraph choose, in the face of all the evidence, to minimise the horrific nature of the attack by stating that “Both children were left alive by the killers”? Zainab was not left alive by design, she was shot in the chest and her skull was stove in, which presumably was a pretty serious attempt to kill a seven year-old child. The other girl might very well have succeeded in hiding from the killers under her mother’s skirts, as she hid from the first rescuers, and then for eight hours from the police.
The Telegraph article claims to be informed by sources close to the investigation. So they believe it was a group of people, and feel motivated to absolve those people from child-killing. Now what could the Daily Telegraph be thinking?
and a rider… if they suggested that she get a photograph to use for identification it must mean that Mollier despite his head wound could still be identified so he couldn’t have been one of those requiring DNA because they were so disfigured.
Well,the Mail seems pretty sure of that photo of the hunter from miles away. ? I would have thought that the Mail wouldn’t want to be accused of prematurely announcing someone’s death.
Was this notice noted a couple of weeks ago?
Profondément touchés par
toutes les marques d’affection
et de soutien dans la douleur
de la disparition de
Sylvain MOLLIER
Claire Schutz; Léo, Mathis et
Louis Mollier; les familles Mollier
et Schutz, vous remercient
d’avoir contribué à adoucir leur
peine immense par votre
présence, votre discrétion, vos
chaleureux et réconfortants
témoignages de sympathie.
[Le Dauphine Libere 14 October, p 22]
I don’t think Claire Schutz has talked to anybody. And if a terrible wrong has been done, she’s not speaking out. Obviously silenced. I don’t think SM would ever have needed to be extracted. And Brett Martin didn’t seem to think the car park was unsavoury did he? He went there upto 20 times, even with his family. But then nobody is spilling the beans.
thanks for that Dopey 31 Oct, 2012 – 1:07 am. sweet. it reminds us amidst all the intrigue the bastards that did this robbed two little girls of their parents, and a sister of a loving sister
Do all dentists keep these in their kitchens at home? [ref tweet by salibabe, who said Ikbal did]
http://modulardental.tradeindia.com/dental-compressor-152945.html
For molecular gastronomy??
Been lurking and reading with interest without saying much, so as not to interrupt the process with mere opinion offerings. But – that picture of Mollier in the DM – I distinctly remember it was first uncovered here – and nowhere else (maybe previous thread) more than 2 weeks ago, and there were many discussions of that. It was the bow hunting club, as I recall, right? people were not sure because it was such a goodly distance away. I wonder whether the LeRouche connection will surface next in some reporters account.
So, there seems to be good reason to believe the reporters are following this blog. There were other allusions to items or contradictions first brought up by the capable commenters here (had a couple of specific examples in mind – maybe later).
More interesting are the stories that keep changing – the BM interview where the “as if playing with her sibling” disappears. The shots that were heard by some witnesses some distance away and then never mentioned again (because if someone heard them from so far away then BM, much closer, would have had to have heard them too. yet he said nothing). The ever deepening mess with the timing – looks like the PTBs are giving up coming with a timeline “fix” – per Tim V’s timeline tracing, they will not be able to resolve the contradictions, so the only solution is to mess it up even more. So, it will likely get even more garbled as time goes on.
And evidently certain organizations in the US that have the power to immediately scrub pages from ancestry.com (no mere group or individual could do it -certainly not so fast). The question is – why was it so important to eliminate that Hashim entry? and if it was important, how long will the PTBs be willing to leave this blog standing with all the family connections and the speculations they invite?
The investigative efforts by Bluebird into the al Hilli’s are impressive – but though it is not clear yet how the histories of hashim and kadhim plus relation with Sadaam are connected with the murder, there is clearly danger in uncovering some of those murky past connections. Also, if the al Hillis were that significant then surely the murder of one of the clan – Saad and family – is not likely to go unavenged by someone, somewhere. No matter what the reasons were.
Finally, another sign – Kathie’s strange recommendation of a suffix that was ferreted out as a tracking aid. What does it mean? why such carelessness? and what would Anders7777 have said (do I remember right that he had her on his special list?).
Adding this all together -I’d say – more power to all of you here amateur detectives par excellance, but please take care and stay vigil. The first warning has already been delivered, I believe. The second one will be the sudden unannounced shut down of the thread (someone can lean on CM or the provider, if there is enough reason to do so which will happen when the trails gets really hot. Those prepared to murder so many people will surely not stop at a little interference in information flow, will they?). My advise would be to start preparing an alternative venue to escape to, just in case.
@Bluebird
31 Oct, 2012 – 12:59 am
Thank you. I think that makes the best fit with the historical narrative as we understand it up to that point in time.
And if that’s correct, then as you I think said, history has to be re-written. At least the public version, for I am sure, reading those wikileaks cables about the plight of the last remnants of Baghdad’s Jewish community, which are in fact, very insightful and quite moving, that those in the know within governments and the security services would be well aware of the truth.
Then we would have to ask, what implications does this have for our understanding of subsequent events and the current geopolitical situation?
Thoughts, anyone?
All sound and good, Marlin, but lets await independent (other than Bluebird’s) confirmation that Hashim’s entry really has been deleted on Ancestry.com. And ask ourselves the following:
1) What would be the point of delting information, when it already exists in copies (on Bluebirds disc for example – Why don’t you publish it on icke, bluebird?) and its surely must exist on the Wayback Machine?
and
2) Could relatives ask for information about their ancestors to be romoved?
Morning all,
That’s a great link Bluebird, are there any secrets left in the banking world I wonder ?
Thanks Tim, yes all the papers said ‘forehead, googling it brings up at least 10, obvious really when the statement came from Mailluad.
So do you now see why I say the gunman would have to have been reaching into the car to do three executions that way ?
I agree about DNA, Mollier was shot in the back so I can’t see how his face was disfigured.
Marlin, I can assure you my life couldn’t be further removed from the spy world, if I were an agent what in Gods name do you think I’d be doing here ??? I can assure you I’d be in Annecy snooping !
This is purely a blogsite which can be seen around the world……. you’ve been watching too many thrillers !!!
Mochyn/Bluebird.
Taking the Jewish angle, I said I thought Saad looked Jewish long ago, do you also remember my comment about the three condolence messages on his FB page all with the same name ? They were from three members of the ‘revert’ to Islam section, I asked had he reverted to Islam & become a muslim……….could that be the change Aked noticed & why he had become anti Jewish & pro Palestine ?
If any of this is true surely it would be a shock to find he was Jewish & father had never told him for his own safety, also I kept asking where is his mosque community, normally they are tight knit but he clearly was not devout even enough for show.
Kenneth, I suppose you have a point. Would be nice to get confirmation of everything but with mere admitted amateur sleuths, one can ask for only so much.
As for the second part of your point 1 – it sort of defeats the first part – ie, if ancestry-com is considered definitive enough as evidence of record of entry – to where we need second confirmation of the same source to make it believable – as you suggest- then clearly you assume that merely having a record on an internet blog – be it Icke or CM would NOT – on its own – be considered sufficently evidentiary proof, and will not be taken seriously. So I think you have to pick which part of the argument you want to hold prime.
As to point 2 – unfortunately I don’t know the answer to that. I would assume there is a process for correcting inaccuracies, but can’t imagine that merely a request by a relative would be sufficient reason to expunge a public record.
All in all, it would have been nice tyo have second – and third – opinions.
@Bluebird
29 Oct, 2012 – 5:08 pm
Just having a look at some of the personages on your UNO delegation arriving New York on 19th September 1950.
8. Crook Reginald D. (49) (Britain) United Nations
Reginald Douglas Crook, 1st Baron Crook
M, #325889, b. 2 March 1901, d. 1989
Last Edited=20 Feb 2011
Reginald Douglas Crook, 1st Baron Crook was born on 2 March 1901.1 He was the son of Percy Edwin Crook and Charlotte Edith Rainey.2 He married Ida Gertrude Haddon, daughter of Joseph George Haddon, on 2 October 1922. He died in 1989.
He was educated at Strand School, England.1 He was Organising Secretary of the Poor Law Officers’ Union between 1919 and 1925. He was General Secretary of the Ministry of Labour Staff Association between 1925 and 1951.1 He was member of the Civil Service National Whitley Council between 1925 and 1951. He was editor of Civil Service Argus between 1928 and 1951.1 He was Honorary Secretary of the Labour Party Association between 1945 and 1949. He was created 1st Baron Crook, of Carshalton, co. Surrey [U.K.] on 3 July 1947. He held the office of Justice of the Peace (J.P.) for Surrey in 1948. He was Member of the United Nations Administration Tribunal between 1951 and 1971. He was invested as a Knight, Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem (K.St.J.) in 1955.
http://www.thepeerage.com/p32589.htm#i325889
RE: Mollier & Shutz.
Could they be Jewish ? Shutz is a German Jewish name. Jews marry Jews.
Germans,know of Saddams banking, Germans/Siemens sent faulty fuel rods to Iran, Mollier inside man to ensure only faulty goods are smuggled to Iran, AH also insider collecting info to report back on progress & double crossed / set up by someone who knows his secret ?
Oh,I see Paddy has already been there. Must have missed his post through moderation.
There is mention of Cynthia Jebb here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/the-life-and-loves-of-a-society-queen-1307438.html
This puts our Hashim at the heart of British Labour/Liberal high society and by extension its connection to US Democrat high society in the 1950s.
Some connections!
katie, far be it from me to imagine anything about your life – here we deal only with what people choose to disclose. And you made a boo-boo. Also, you don’t have to be an actual spook for the kind of work some might imagine. There are for example legions of what we know as zio-trolls whose job it is to infest I/P and liberal talk boards and forums for any number of reasons. Some of those are obvious (and quickly disappear) and some are sleepers, just commenting away right along with everyone else. This last category are considered the “monitors”. Their job is to pick up information rather than steer things up.
Not saying you are or could ever be a zio-troll – this blog is not about that. Merely using that example as a way of mentioning the different roles individuals could play on the internet, which is really all about perception engineering.
Did I mention that some agents are paid and some are not? if you were any kind of agent I just hope you are of the former. Not worth it otherwise, IMO.
PS do not mean to fling accusations so do not feel obliged to defend against anything. You have your reasons and interests for being here just like everyone else. But others have the right to comment based on facts as they are revealed, that’s all.
David Rees-Williams, 1st baron Ogmore
Rees-Williams was elected Labour Member of Parliament for Croydon South in 1945, defeating the incumbent MP, Sir Herbert Williams. In the government he was a minister in the Colonial Office, travelling to East Asia to consider the movements towards independence.
… …
Lord Ogmore joined the Liberal Party in 1959 and served as Liberal Party President, 1963 – 1964.
Lord Ogmore was married to Alice Alexandra Constance Wills. He had three children. His daughter, Elizabeth Rees-Williams, married the actors Richard Harris and Sir Rex Harrison, the businessman Peter Aitken, and more recently Jonathan Aitken, the former Conservative MP. His grandson is actor Jared Harris.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rees-Williams,_1st_Baron_Ogmore
Sttill amazing that no one but me is taking up that French investigators are looking for an escaped psychopath who had no motive and not much expertise for committing the massacre – a profile which matches quite closely that of William Hershkovitz whose murder of his boss Armando al-Abed, and own killing are neither investigated nor explained.
Rather go on about not forgetting the most dead al-Hillis, and be quite paranoid about the spooks being present here, and interested in what is being said, investigated, and ignored.
This discussion is just about as stuck as the wheels on the al-Hillis’ car when Saad was trying to make their escape.
Notice the Surrey connections?
This captcha is doing wonders for my mental arithmetic skills!
Marlin ,chuck !
I made no ‘Boo Boo’ whatsoever, I was merely handing out a tip which I was given a number of years ago [ & I have used over & over] when I started my blogging days, it is as simple as that, I should have realised suspicious paranoid minds would not take it for what it was……….
As it happens, it used to be used for getting all comments on one page,but I see now it does not. Case closed.
@Katie
31 Oct, 2012 – 7:37 am
You never did answer Anders’ question about your previous blogs, did you?
Forgot the captcha again!
M.
Yes I did, it was Kathy actually[ I think ] that asked.
My answer was that one was private & the other is public, but in view of what we are posting here & that my photo & info is all over it, I would rather not name it, just as you blog under an avatar for your privacy .
This was accepted.
At least I blog under my own name.
Mochyn
It would make sense to give your half brother in exile who was the director of the iraqi bank one time and who understands banking busieness, the right to manage your properties and monies in foreign countries. Particularly when he is a jew with connections to all capital organisations in the west. I dont believe the story of the only one geneve account. Perhaps it was just saad who knew about that one account. But a supposed half brother of that intelligence knowledge, CIA education and political contacts to uk, usa, uno and all arab governments would be the ideal manager. The more that nobody knows that he is your half brother.
When hashim has died, somebody else was chosen. Perhaps kadhim, the other half brother?
I dont think so because kadhim was not into banking and not so reknown in world politicd with less contacts. Perhaps he was allowed to manage a few accounts and Iraqi Saddam properties, such as March Court. THE REST i suppose was managed by somebody else, chosen by Hashims last will and Saddams decision. Somebody who played a major role in oil for food and bribing.
After Kadhims death the trouble began about his remaining Saddam property management. Perhaps the al saffars and a now anti israel saad (jewphopia?, the same jewphopia that saddam suffered?) … wanted hand on that money. Al saffar i always see close to hezbolah organisations. The older hillis were CIA assats. Saad was not or else he converted particularly because of influence of his wive’s family and because he saw CIA wrongdoing with Arabs after 9/11 and in Iraq.
I guess that Saad became not only a dangerous player for CIA but for Israel, too.
Mollier
I am with you, mochyn. Mollier was a CIA asset at Areva. It is known that CIA had people in Areva to inofficially support nuclear trade with Iran and Libya. The americans could not trade directly. There is history written about thst matter of fact.
CIA knew the history about the hussain, the hilli and the ibtahim family because they were all their own asset.
If that all is true or nearly true given the few puzzle stones we have, then we would have to rewrite the history of middle east.
@Katie
31 Oct, 2012 – 7:51 am
OK that’s fair enough.Understand completely.
Correction:
Ibtahim = ibrahim family. Typo!
Saddam’s other 3 half brothers in iraqi government.
It seems to me that the CIA owned all seats in iraqi government during the saddam times. And i see the assassination of general Tulfah, Saddam’s brother in law, from another perspective now. He must have known his family secret, too.
And i remember saddam saying:
“In 100 years the world will know and understand the real reason about why i had war with iran and why i had to invade kuweit and the world will say: saddam, you just did what you had to do!”
Nobody understood this sentence 20 years ago. Do we understand this better today? I do.
This is all Bullshit all this disinformation about Saddam being a Jew. Its ridiculous and in fact an insult to all Jews. It’s just about the most crazy thing I’ve heard!
Does anybody nowhere Bluebird lives? On the Conundrum thread he said as much as he grew up in Dublin, and on this thread he said he lives “close to Peter”. I took that to be the Lowlands. Sure the Lowlands had many birds (particularly before industrialisation and the intensive farming) – and he has said as much, that his chosen pseudonyme should make it easy to guess where he resides, although I never got that part. But what do you others think?
Of course Bluebird is an American bird, which never, ever had been near the cliffs of Dover — it was just an American song that Very Linn gave a little twist and popualised. So the Lowlands close the the Dover Strait would be my guess.
Here is a link with photographs, especially a current, full- face one, of William Hershkovitz:
http://fandaily.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/William-Hershkowitz-Leonardo-Hotel-shooting-Armando-al-Abed-photos.jpg
Was he the guy stopped on a motorcycle by those Forestry inspectors after the massacre?
If he was, his being an American could hrlp explain why they let him go without further ado.
Much more interesting than all this most belated to-do about Sylvain Mollier being a mystery man when he was set up for murder by the French securocrats, and has been discussed and a photograph of him posted long ago.
If the Daily Mail is willing to print this Sylvain Mollier’s photo can we assume that they have done enough to confirm it is him?
Does that put the possibility of his cap being back on the dash and SM sitting in the front passenger seat talking to SAH?
It may have been a little uncomfortable for him…..
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4527567/Alpine-gun-massacre-orphan-girls-family-finally-arrive-in-France.html
Corroborates Leila’s tweet that the only child seat was in the front of the BMW here:-
Mr Al-Hilli, 50, was driving the BMW while the two women passengers were sitting in the back seat because there was an unused child’s seat in the front of the car.
So the child seat was removed, was that why the rear hatch was open, to put it in the boot?
——————————
Please watch this video (anything interesting said in the interview) but mainly to look at the bushes behind the interview. This damage to the undergrowth is made not by a bike being thrown in there -so either a car being driven or reversed in here or 2 people having a fight in there.
http://www.tsitv.fr/videos/lieux-crime-acc.php
Sorensen
Although i like dublin and i had been there quite often, i am not an irish bird. Birds tend to fly in the south in winter. Just look at my awful english grammar and bad use of vocabulary. Worse than my typo.
Abour the matter of facts:
1. Baby Saddam grew up in a jewish family.
2. His mother Subha was pregnant and not married. Usually a death sentence amongst muslims. Recently a sheik said that she was a prostitute. We have to see this differently. A prostitue in muslim religion is every woman having sex while she is not married to this guy. That was the matter of fact here. Her fathers family would have killed her when she would go home because of family honour. She would not just knock at the door of an unknow rich jewish family begging for shelter. It is logic in arab countries that the said fathrrs family will have to care for mother and child. She becomes their own daughter then.
The rich jewish family with a deseased or killed father will care for her. However they are in responsibiliy to search or to buy a father for her because of family owner. Then in 1941 hashim coming back from the usa with his jolly good friend hasan ibrahim who told everybody that he was on a Hadj (written history). In fact he was in the usa.
Ibrahim is selected to marry subha because he is a family friend and of her age.
Tell me where you aee missing the logic.
Tim V 30 Oct, 2012 – 3:14 pm
“CORRECTION: I agree NR
30 Oct, 2012 – 10:53 am their behaviour is odd after the event as well as before. We should always remember he is a mature, highly trained pilot and instructor well drilled in dealing with accidents, incidents and first aid. In the interview he tends to down play this. Would such a person TWICE leave a wounded and unconscious child of seven in a location of potential DANGER from a mad gunman? After all incident training puts this as first and most important. In the absence of medical assistance would it not have been likely to carry the little girl back towards the Didierjean’s car? Then in view of what he had just seen, any intention of just going home by car or bike is quite unbelievable. What average person would consider leaving before speaking to the police, let alone a highly trained officer in the RAF?”
This triggered a thought. BM says he had a dilemma if to leave the girl the first time he went for help on the bike. But he says Didierjean and the two women drove up to the lay-by in their car and he followed. So there’s no reason to leave the girl on the ground and everybody abandon her. They could put her in the car if they were genuinely worried about the shooter still lurking. Even with her injuries it’s a better option than leaving her for the killer to finish off.
His statement makes less and less sense, though I still think it’s mostly (say 75%) true and the rest lies or alterations to cover “something” up. It’s as if he was not only in a panic but in shock. He knew the victims or the killer or was shot at himself.
Here’s a what if: The Didierjean group was the one with which the SAH group or SM was to meet?
Ho ho ho……this puts a spanner in the works, I have read a couple of times that Mr X was a Chaldean Christian well it seems to be true, the Pope honoured him too.
So Saddam was happy to work with a Catholic.
“Two similar figures, Nadhmi A***i and Antoin S. “Tony” Rezko, served as the intermediaries.
Both are Middle Eastern males of Catholic Christian heritage who left Baathist dictatorships for Western cities (Auchi from Iraq to London, Rezko from Syria to Chicago). Both became successful businessmen who hobnobbed with politicians and promoted Arab interests.
Oct. 29, 2008 update: WorldNetDaily.com has published an unsigned article, “Did Saddam bagman help Obama purchase mansion? Photo confirms Rezko financier in bed with late Iraqi tyrant,” that asserts many new points salient to the Barack Obama-Saddam Hussein connection. Concerning Auchi, it asserts that:
A***i and Saddam Hussein were cousins.
A***i joined Saddam Hussein’s regime as an official in the Ministry of Oil in 1967.”
REZKO IS A SYRIAN.
http://everything.explained.at/Chaldean_Christians/
{http://everything.explained.at/Nadhmi_Auchi/}
{http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2008/10/more-on-the-links-between-obama-and-saddam}
Just a few more historical snippets about Hashim.
Please note that in the index in the book about FL WRight his name is given as “Hashim Hilli”, not “Hashim AL Hilli”.
Feed google with “Hashim Hilli”, and voilá – some historical info pops up.
the photograph from the FL Wright book, page 76
http://books.google.com/books?id=MTI17Q5Tok0C&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=%22hashim+hilli%22&source=bl&ots=HAAl3BrElH&sig=Krf8-sXQQCQveYIfd3SHSpC_Vmw&hl=de&sa=X&ei=6vGQUIaxA4XNsgbzqYDIBA&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22hashim%20hilli%22&f=false
A newspaper article, Sydney Morning Herald, July 23, 1958 – after the 1958 revolution – that one tells us:
“Iraq’s Consul-General in New York, Mr. Hashim Hilli, also notified U.S. authorities yesterday that he now represents the new republic.”
read it here:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1301&dat=19580723&id=QnlWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=D-UDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3055,5352649
There are more newspaper articles; however, I don’t have access, since I am not registered there – maybe someone else around here?
{http://newspaperarchive.com/chester-times/1958-06-19/page-27/}
{http://newspaperarchive.com/logansport-press/1959-03-31/}
{http://newspaperarchive.com/daily-capital-news/1959-03-31/}
{http://newspaperarchive.com/derrick/1959-03-31/}
Hashim Hilli – apparently mentioned in unyearbook several times. Somehow I cannot get access to those documents, Hopefully someon else can? Links are here
{http://unyearbook.un.org/1948-49YUN/1948-49_P1_CH2.pdf}
{http://unyearbook.un.org/isysquery/22543865-3bf7-41ea-bf12-261b530edc2d/2/doc/1955_APPENDICES.pdf}
{http://unyearbook.un.org/isysquery/334b8050-7e58-4a2d-930b-8035dfbe985d/2/doc/}
Good luck!