My post on the shootings in France has brought tens of thousands of people to this site – but not to read my dull contribution. People are coming to read the comments from other readers.
Today’s development of the bomb squad descending on the al-Hilli house does not in itself worry me enormously. You may recall the massive terror scare that was ramped up when some Muslim students in Manchester were found to own a bag of sugar.
In fact we have the opposite phenomenon today, with the spook-fed “security correspondents” on TV lining up to tell us it is probably just everyday household stuff. This deviation from the standard Islamophobic “Muslims = bombs” narrative is so startling it makes me wonder why the “move along, nothing to see here” line is being taken so quickly.
My own security services sources insist that al-Hilli was not a person of current interest to the UK intelligence agencies and was not involved in anything clandestine. I have no reason to disbelieve them. On the other hand, the limited and confusing information in the media is almost entirely from official sources. I find it very strange indeed how little attention has been paid to the murdered French cyclist, and how easily it is presumed he was just a passerby. Surely it is as likely he was the intended victim and the al-Hillis the accidental witnesses?
Please do read the comments on my first entry on the subject to see the debate unfettered by the censorship in the mainstream media. This is perhaps my favourite comment:
From Janesmith101
All comments regarding Sylvain, Al-Hilli and a possible nuclear link are being removed from sites I’ve posted on in The Guardian, Independent and Huffpo UK.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/sep/09/alps-killer-motive-baffles-police
Here was my comment, I added as a point of fact it was completely speculative and an unproven theory in a later comment, also removed.
Sylvain Mollier, the ‘passing’ cyclist, was in fact a nuclear metallurgist who worked for a french nuclear company called Cezus (a subsidiary of Areva). Cezus fabricates and processes zirconium into metal and nuclear grade zircoaloy for nuclear fuel assemblies – it also has other applications in aerospace such as components and ceramics for missiles and satellites. Mr Al-Hilli was also a skilled aerospace engineer, on what looks to be his first camping holiday.
What is the probability that two highly skilled engineers managed be at the same remote place, at the same time, yet still managed to end up dead as a result of what looks to be a military style assasination?
As someone else pointed out in The Independent comments, the deceased were found by a ‘retired’ RAF officer who, we assume, will recieve perpetual anonymity as a witness. If the police are looking for a motive, try an intercepted rendevous by a security service fixated on denying a hostile power illicit nuclear technology.
http://wrmea.org/component/content/article/162-1995-june/7823-israel-bombs-iraqs-osirak-nuclear-research-facility.html
The Huffington Post UK reports that this wasn’t the family’s first trip to the camp site. An earlier report had asked other camp site visitors whether they had seen the family before and they had replied they hadn’t. If this isn’t wasn’t the first visit by Al-Hilli, it might slightly increase the odds that he knew or had met Mollier before, this being the last in a series of rendevous of a transactional nature. Mollier lived and worked locally.
Again, I’m not sure of the truth of these reports, there is some very sloppy journalism, as there is always seems to be. I’ve read for example Mollier’s company Cevus descirbed as a steel firm something which it is patently not, but perhaps it may have been a detail lost in translation.
An interesting comment summing up some of the strange coincidences, at least, surrounding these murders. My other favourite comment calls me a “macchiavellian shill”.
I have only one thought of my own I want to add at the minute. Al-Hilli was a Shia muslim and had been on pilgrimage to Qoms in Iran. What if it is indeed true that he was in possession of no especial nuclear or defence secrets to pass on to the Iranians, but the Israelis thought that he was? The Israeli programme of assassination of scientists involved in Iran’s nuclear programme is a definite fact. It makes as much sense as anything else at the moment, as a possibility.
I am not saying that is what happened. But the directions in which the mainstream media is being so strenuously pointed by official sources, like the massacre of an entire family over an inheritance, are certainly no more inherently probable. Certainly as we are now told all the shots were from one gun, for the assassin to get each victim in the head with none of them being able to escape, indicates real proficiency with the weapon and a very high level of training.
Latest
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/alps-murders-annecy-squad-to-join-forces-with-surrey-police-8163894.html
@all
Can’t believe I’m reading the old Mail vs Guardian battle lines being drawn. I’d have hoped the old political print division wouldn’t have encroached onto a board such as this. Blue_Bear and others don’t back down, Katie’s comments regarding going ‘back home’ were indeed racist/xenophobic/plain ignorant. There is no place for people who hold such views in any forum of discussion. I don’t agree with the extended reaction to it by some (childish tactics will not now, or ever, be worthwhile), but Dopey, surely you can recognise a bigot regardless of the backlash.
reading the old Mail vs Guardian battle lines being drawn. I’d have hoped the old political print division wouldn’t have encroached onto a board such as this. Blue_Bear and others don’t back down, Katie’s comments regarding going ‘back home’ were indeed racist/xenophobic/plain ignorant. There is no place for people who hold such views in any forum of discussion. I don’t agree with the extended reaction to it by some (childish tactics will not now, or ever, be worthwhile), but Dopey, surely you can recognise a bigot regardless of the backlash.
=====
I was fooled by dopey and I admit it.
To not speak up says it all, really.
@Anders
Can’t find journo, ballistics, nada. But he does make it sound like he knows what he’s talking about, gun-wise.
First four comments follow:
Peter
15 Sep, 2012 – 10:34 am
5. Re no blood splatters, could this be explained by low-power cartridges in 7.65mm as per the Beretta’s used by Flight Marshalls?
IMHO, more likely explanation is that dead people just don’t bleed that much. Moreover, I am pretty sure that the killer used standard FMJ ball ammunition. Looking at the image of the shot-up BMW, one can see that two shots were fired through the windscreen from outside. One missed and went high, hit the windscreen top-centre and exited through the roof panel on the righ-hand side. The other went in low over the instrument pod and probably hit the driver square in the chest or head.
Likewise, there are two exit holes in the B- and C-pillar of the BMW (those pink spots in the photos). I believe that only full-powered FMJ ammunition would be capable of creating those exit holes after passing first through glass and then (presumably) through a human body.
Peter
15 Sep, 2012 – 11:01 am
There have been fairly sound reports saying th weapon is a preferred weapon of the Serbian mafia. Does anyone want to address this?
AFAIK, it still has not been confirmed that the weapon used indeed was a Skorpion Vz 61. If it was, it used to be everybody’s favourite weapon for close-range defence. Calling it a signature weapon of the Serbian mob is overstating the case.
Looking at this image
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/09/08/article-2200388-14DEF9C4000005DC-848_638x624.jpg
it is obvious that neither “bursts” nor “double taps” were fired at that car, only single shots. The Skorpion has a single-shot mode, so that doesn’t rule it out.
Peter
15 Sep, 2012 – 11:33 am
Ok why such a small weapon? easy to carry n a Motorbike?
Again, we – or at least I – don’t know whether or not a Skorpion Vz 61 was used. It could equally well have been a CZ 83, a Beretta or any other self-loading pistol in .32 ACP / 7.65 Browning.
If it was a Skorpion, it was probably used because it packs an awful punch for such a small weapon and because it is relatively easy to get hold of in criminal circles, certainly easier than a HK MP7 or some other similar, more modern gun. In short, it would have been used because either it was the best gun for the job that the shooter could get hold of, or (to appease the conspiracy theorists out there) because somebody wanted to make this assassination look like the handiwork of non-state actors, “mere” violent criminals.
Peter
15 Sep, 2012 – 12:04 pm
I wonder why somebody needs an acid drum of that size if he doesn’t have a chemical factory
Now that you have mentioned it, @ Bluebird … Maybe he did have a chemical factory in his garden shed Seriously, without wishing to malign the dead, my personal best guess at this stage is that one of the al-Hillis may have been a “cook”.
Looking at the murder scene, which to me really does look like a drug deal gone bad, and nothing like a state-sanctioned execution; looking at the lifestyle of the family, which is difficult to square with Mr al-Hilli’s official income situation; looking at the weird timing of their camping holiday, when their children were about to start school; considering the fact that the police called in the bomb squad to check out their garden workshop – I would not rule out the possibility that they were “cooking” in that garden shed.
etc etc
Once again, thanks so much for that link to “The Gentleman’s Guide To Forum Spies (spooks, feds, etc.)”
http://pastebin.com/irj4Fyd5
Not that I’m any kind of Gentleman, mind you!
As someone else said (was it you, Blue Bear?) this thread has played out pretty much as you predicted, which is interesting, and quite an education I can tell you!
=====
You are welcome.
I KNEW this would happen. I don’t like to put people on IGNORE but I’ve started doing it as from two days ago with James, and he’s buggered off, thankfully! I skim many posters now too.
I do try and be didactic, we were all newbies once. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, but this place is frankly crawling with all the variants the Gentleman’s Giide warm of.
Anders how utterly ridiculous…and I was fooled too- I never took you for a sheep.
I chose not to get embroiled in that argument. There were several chipping in and I saw no need to add to that, and still don’t. I’m not here to discuss race or immigration, I’m here to discuss this particular case.
Please stop stirring the shit because you’ve nothing else of note to talk about tonight.
3 people picked up in helicopter from local airport,has that one been put to bed,if not was it SAH, wife and Swede..?…..To be reunited with children at a later date?
=====
Could very well be Jon!!!
Bots r us have tried to rubbish the chopper flight but I believe it.
Thanks ferret, he’s a total fraud,
Anders how utterly ridiculous…and I was fooled too- I never took you for a sheep.
I chose not to get embroiled in that argument. There were several chipping in and I saw no need to add to that, and still don’t. I’m not here to discuss race or immigration, I’m here to discuss this particular case.
Please stop stirring the shit because you’ve nothing else of note to talk about tonight.
=====
Ok I am not dhit stirring I am just feeling that your posts have been rather off the last day or two. You have the benefit of the doubt,so,please
Carry on. 🙂
@Dopey
Don’t attack Anders for agreeing with something I said. If you have a problem with the insinuation, address it to me. IMO anyone who expresses views such as Katie’s should have no right to be taken seriously in a case involving people(race/creed/colour/whatever) she is obviously prejudiced against.
@ anders
yes you are….and ohhhh, I have the benefit of the doubt? Thank God! I don’t know how on earth I could have slept tonight without having that 😉
@ haden
Two words
Butt out.
@dopey
doubt? Thank God! I don’t know how on earth I could h
=====
I’m a nice guy, what can I say?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb2codFsTTk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
@Dopey
> Butt out??
You’ve been sheltering a bigot from the comments of others. Sure some have just been bullies off point, but seriously?! I can’t believe anyone here would take her seriously after that. Her integrity as to this discussion has been well and truly fucked.
No need to use foul language Haden. It’s not big and it’s not clever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU
Jon, it’s been discussed. I hadn’t thought it necessary until now. I’d assumed that as there were passports found in the car there’d be a legal/legit way for them to flee – maybe someone was to help them to the border – meaning they had lots of time to get away.
I’d forgotten about Peter’s suggestion of drug-deal-gone-bad! Classic 🙂
Ferret, the Andrew May info is excellent.
Thanks Haden.
Blimey! It wasn’t really foul in the context. I used it to mean defunct or generally broken. No sexual context, so really no vulgarity. But if you wish to argue the point thus, well….I give up. Especially as you decided not to comment on the foul content of Katie’s racist remarks, but defend her against people who understandably had issue with them.
Haden
A pathetic response.
And that is my last reply to you. I’d rather spend a minute doing somwthing more interesting…like file my nails or something.
Dopey. More importantly maybe; stand up for the society in which you live as a British citizen. Racism has no place here.
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin — an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.
Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the ‘image’ and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to ‘act their role in character’ as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later — an emotional yo-yo.
With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game — where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
COMEDY GOLD FROM HERR PETER! 🙂
15 Sep, 2012 – 4:20 pm
As I have said before, I do not wish to besmirch the reputation of the dead. So, let’s just say that there are a few facts indicating that this murder is more likely to have been perpetrated by a criminal than by an intelligence service.
1. There was only one shooter
http://www.smh.com.au/world/one-bad-man-in-alps-massacre-20120915-25zo0.html
who was not a particularly good shot at that.
2. The french cyclist managed to make it onto the scene, which implies that there were no lookouts to watch the shooter’s back. This is not how Mossad or any other intelligence service conducting “wet jobs” operates.
3. The shooter attempted to kill the entire family. That either makes him a lunatic (unlikely) or somebody who was personally known to one or more of the adult victims and therefore feared that any survivors would identify him (more likely).
4. If this had been the Mossad or some similar outfit trying to send a message, why didn’t they leave a calling card, for example by using Desert Eagles with some fancy ammunition?
Anders7777
15 Sep, 2012 – 6:50 pm
Bourne clone assassin abseils into the apt, smashing the window, and sprays the place up with an Uzi?
Well, epic fight. And old Jason wins, but only just, because the MK robot just keeps on coming, punch drunk for more punishment.
See – that’s what these cubicle BOYZ are programmed to do.
Like a scene from BOILERHOUSE all they can do is follow their SCRIPT.
No imagination at all, they can’t deviate you see.
The effect they want to achieve is to marginalise me, tony Roma, felix, ferret, dopey, molliemalone, and a few others – as kooks.
Peters technique – all of them, because they do constant 24 hour shifts – is to above all remain calm and unemotional. And to keep plugging away, Peter in his vomit-inducing ingratiating way (they are all the same), in order to try and plant SEEDS OF DOUBT in the thread.
Other sock puppets, probably old pete himself with several IDs, will then agree with him.
And on and on it goes, day after day, which is why clarkeyboy thinks the whole thread is mad.
Well, it will appear that way if you are not reading it in realtime.
If you read it for an update say once a day, the spook peters bank on the fact that most people here do not follow in realtime, and thus will tend to gravitate to the unemotional ARSEHOLES, who by and large are playing a game,
Isn’t that right Peter?
Anders much lauded 7/7 Ripple Effect is in fact a complete pile of fruitloop horse manuare. The July7 Truth Campaugn had this to say about it;
7/7 Ripple Effect continues on in much the same vein, from which we can only conclude that by using every known discrepancy in the reports of the events of July 7th, many of which are examined in detail by J7 in our sections Mind The Gaps I and II, and weaving them into a totally evidence-free and fanciful hypothesis, which would be more honestly described as a ‘What If’ rather than what ‘Really did happen’, will do more harm than good in aiding anyone to get to the truth of the events of that day.
In summing up 7/7 Ripple Effect, we leave the final words to a J7 researcher:
“… nor is joining up the loose ends in that wretched government “narrative” in the fashion of a Saturday night fictional TV thriller particularly likely to be viewed positively – drop the fantasy references, re-edit it to play as a ‘what if?’ docudrama that is clearly self explained/described as an unsubstantiated narrative the same as the official government narrative is and it might get more respect, but as it stands, it’s just too damn kooky for me to believe it’s accidental.
Sorry Muad, but the people you most need to reach are least likely to take you seriously – if that is a concern of course, and if it’s not, then that says quite a lot.”
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/j-for-justice-77-ripple-effect.html
———————————————————————
Oh yean ‘Maud’ is actually the less glamorous John Hill from Sheffield. He also claims on his website to be the Messiah, and that George Lucas was told the script of Star Wars telepathically by The Force. 🙄
This is the ORIGINAL Ripple Effect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PQG5weeHk
This is the UPDATED Ripple Effect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE
j7 bad name for a security firm,think j4s,serco etc all with mossad connections.
j7 a elderly gay boy band popular in the bars of vauxhall
or
bunch of shill paid gatekeepers and shill shitster cointelpro merchants who like beating each others flacid meat.
who knows who cares certainly the money will be drying up soon as you are not doing a good enough job.
LOL, we’ve missed you Tony Roma 🙂
May 14, 2011 — London, England
Now that Muad’Dib/John Hill has been found not guilty, the full story to this point of His malicious and politically motivated prosecution can be told…
Three years ago, Muad’Dib mailed some DVDs containing his ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ film to a courthouse near London, where three scapegoats were being prosecuted in hopes of lending credibility to the government’s “official” 7/7 story. These DVDs were sent by Muad’Dib because he wanted to keep innocent men from receiving very lengthy prison sentences. ALL the rest of us who knew about that situation should be ashamed for not having done exactly what Muad’Dib did.
As a result of his good-will, Muad’Dib’s home was raided by police and he was arrested on a charge of “attempting to pervert the course of justice”. In the Orwellian 21st century, he was really just being attacked by a malicious and out of control police-state for getting in the way of their mass-murderous crimes (7/7 was an event of mass-murder). The charge against Muad’Dib originated out of the filthy-corrupt Westminster (political) court in London, right next to where the globalist banking syndicate is headquartered.
Muad’Dib then spent over a year and a half fighting extradition to England where he knew it was going to be one corrupt event after another. The very short story is that Muad’Dib’s court-appointed lawyer in Ireland flatly refused to do as instructed and sabotaged any successful defense. Since the other Irish judges were all quite corrupt too, never applying Law, or even the relevant legislation, Muad’Dib’s fight against extradition was eventually denied by the Irish Supreme Court in front of 40 supporters and he was re-imprisoned, then taken to the UK by “counter terrorist” police in November of 2010.
Once there, the more obvious corruption started, as Muad’Dib was at that point held firmly in the clutches of a filthy corrupt British Establishment (including police, courts, and media).
Firstly, Muad’Dib was deleted from the prison’s computer system, with them originally saying that Muad’Dib wasn’t even at their prison and they didn’t know where he was (lies). About that same time, a police officer(?) working to prosecute Muad’Dib stated openly that many other people sent DVDs to the same courthouse as Muad’Dib, but no one else was even investigated, never-mind charged. This was an open admission of a malicious and politically motivated prosecution/persecution.
Eventually the prison system was forced to admit they had Muad’Dib in custody, and a bail application was made, in front of yet another corrupt judge, who had the courtroom closed to the public before denying bail with the official reason that the judge(?) “didn’t want more DVDs to be sent out”. Sending out DVDs is, obviously, not actually a crime. Muad’Dib then spent approximately four months straight, incarcerated, teaching and waking up a sizeable portion of the prison staff and inmates who ALL knew that he did not in any way belong in prison.
In early March of 2011, bail was finally granted by the only judge throughout this entire process that actually seemed like a reasonably honest man. However, this process was still made very difficult by the fact that the prison service kept making “mistakes” or “forgetting” to bring Muad’Dib to his own court hearings. In all, Muad’Dib was only produced for two of seven different court hearings whilst in (police-)state custody.
After being granted bail, one of Muad’Dib’s supporters went to go pay the ransom money, only to find out that, once again, any reference to Muad’Dib had been deleted from the court’s computer systems. This of course complicated things, but eventually the sabotaged system was worked around, the ransom money was paid, and after a bit of haggling with the prison, Muad’Dib was released with barely enough time to travel to his bail address before his court-imposed 10pm nightly curfew. At that point Muad’Dib began refining his defense and legal challenges.
His first action was to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, by proving, with a wealth of evidence, that “queen” Elizabeth is not the rightful monarch, and never was.
This was a two-point argument. First, that Elizabeth knew—both then and now—that she was crowned on a fake coronation stone instead of the real Stone of Destiny/Coronation Stone, which meant not only was she never properly crowned, but she was also knowingly and fraudulently conning the public, and that is why she didn’t want her coronation televised.
The second and absolutely irrefutable part of the arguement, is that Elizabeth had broken her legally binding coronation oath, which is a valid contract she made with the British people allowing her to be their queen. Although more proof exists and was to be used in court, the skeleton legal argument summarizing this jurisdictional challenge can be found online at: REGINA v JAH.
At the end of March 2011, Muad’Dib submitted the basics of this challenge to the court, alongside applications to subpoena “queen” Elizabeth to testify, and also for production of the Sovereign’s Coronation Bible, which Elizabeth had used when swearing her legally binding oath. Elizabeth also signed a written version of the contract, and a high-quality picture of the original can be seen here: Signed Coronation Contract.
Unsurprisingly, nothing at all was heard back from the court, unlike what would normally happen. So, on the final working day before his May 9th trial, Muad’Dib visited the court clerk’s office, and asked them what the situation was. At that point, he was finally notified that his subpoena applications had been denied (by an extremely dirty judge), but that the court had, once again, “mistakenly” mailed that information to the wrong address.
After having been harassed, monitored, restricted, and imprisoned for long periods of time by a completely rotten “judicial system”, May 9th 2011 finally came, and with it, as one would guess, more corruption.
The judge, hand-picked by the Establishment to handle Muad’Dib’s case, was clearly unhappy to have been forced into what he surely saw as a difficult predicament for him. He had a totally innocent man (Muad’Dib) in front of him, and a courtroom full of witnesses which were going to make it very hard for this judge to carry out the orders he’d been given by his evil puppet-masters, which was to make absolutely sure a guilty verdict was returned against Muad’Dib.
First, the judge flatly refused to hear Muad’Dib’s application to subpoena Elizabeth and the Coronation Bible. With that brushed aside, he then read Muad’Dib’s jurisdictional challenge, or at least said he did, which, as above, had/has two points: a) the fake stone used, and b) the broken coronation contract.
After giving Muad’Dib a few minutes to make his case, the judge adjourned the court for the rest of the day. The following morning he came back and said he was denying Muad’Dib’s challenge, ONLY on the grounds that it “didn’t matter” if a fake coronation stone was used. The judge very slyly attempted to ignore a huge amount of Muad’Dib’s challenge, saying absolutely nothing whatsoever about Elizabeth having broken her legally binding contract with the British people. The judge had to ignore and bypass that part of the challenge, because, even by their own silly “rules” and legislation, that part of the challenge is still absolutely water-tight and irrefutable, being very simple contract Law.
The fact that the judge refused to even mention that crucial part of Muad’Dib’s challenge offers a great deal of proof that it cannot be argued against in court, therefore, everyone should be studying the information and using it themselves in any British (or Commonwealth) courtroom possible. If you’ve not broken a Biblical Law, then you cannot be prosecuted for anything by Elizabeth or her agents acting on her behalf.
With Muad’Dib’s challenge officially denied (ran roughshod over as he predicted), the jury was then sworn in, and the prosecution began spewing out a bunch of pointless hot air. Basically, the prosecutor (who was an arrogant, rotten little girl with no moral decency whatsoever–which is why she was picked for the job) had absolutely no legitimate case to argue on behalf of those evil Establishment figures controlling her, and they ALL knew it. So, she just talked around in circles for the better part of a, day, while some members of the public and jury struggled to stay awake.
Once that had finished, Muad’Dib’s only defense was getting up on the witness-stand and explaining to the jury that he sent the DVDs to the courthouse because innocent men were being maliciously prosecuted, just like he now was, and that he could not sit back and watch people go to prison for something they didn’t do. It really was that simple, so, Muad’Dib then used the opportunity to also enlighten everyone in the courtroom about other subjects like the false-flag 911. Upon cross-examination, the aforementioned rotten little girl prosecuting wasted everyone’s time by connivingly trying to get Muad’Dib to say he’d done something wrong. That obviously didn’t work and she ended up hurting her own case even more, deciding she’d better sit down and be quiet when Muad’Dib scolded her for wasting everyone’s time speaking nonsense and trying to argue that black is white, and white is black. Red in the face and embarassed, she sat down.
After this, both sides summed up their cases. The prosecution slandered Muad’Dib and the defense team basically said this whole thing was horribly ridiculous.
Then it was the corrupt (and probably free-masonic) judge’s turn to have the last word. This horror in a black dress went on to do everything he could possibly come up with to try and manipulate the jury into giving a guilty verdict. This judge re-defined the words in the charge, stated Muad’Dib said things that he never said, then outright lied to the jury by stating it was not up to him which evidence they heard, when he had already forbid various (important) pieces of evidence from being shown to the jury (thereby making direct decisions about the evidence being heard). He did basically everything he could to have Muad’Dib found guilty, just short of openly telling the jury that they must convict. Had the public gallery not been full and over-flowing, he probably would have done just that.
The jury then went back to deliberate and about 2 and a half hours later came back saying they couldn’t reach a unanimous decision (possibly a plant in the jury). The judge probably thought the odds were in favor of a conviction, so he then allowed a majority verdict (no less than 10 to 2 either way), and the jury went out again, before coming back an hour later saying they’d made a decision.
The jury forewoman that gave their verdict came in the room beaming with a wonderful smile, and a few other jury members were definitely grinning. A NOT GUILTY verdict was then given and the jury left the room a final time to the applause and gratitude of the public gallery.
The judge then quickly left the courtroom quite visibly upset (knowing he was probably in trouble for failing to get this conviction on behalf of his masters) and the prosecutor waddled away back to whatever crypt she’d crawled out of. The police officer visibly heading-up Muad’Dib’s prosecution actually had the decency to say he was sorry—which was nice, all things considered. However only days later proved he really is a dirty cop and a two-faced establishment shill.
Muad’Dib is once again at complete liberty after having proven that doing the right thing always pays off in the end—IF you don’t lose strength.
As for the rest of us? We can all look forward to a second-edition of the ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ coming out soon. 🙂
Yes, case closed… But a new beginning of sorts is upon us. Keep checking back for updates. This is just a battle won, but this war for Truth, Justice, and Liberty is not over yet.
AMEN.
-The Friends of Muad’Dib