Blair and Kanye West are Prostitutes 2389

 in Uncategorized by

blairnaza

The Tony Blair House Journal (editor Alan Rusbridger) reports on Kanye West’s disgusting private performance for the Kazakh dictator and his family, and takes a sideswipe at David Cameron for visiting that country.

But peculiarly they fail to mention that Tony Blair receives US $4 million a year as a consultant to the worker murdering Kazakh dictator, and that Alistair Campbell and Jonathon Powell as well as Blair visit to give this support – which has included a behind the scenes campaign to help Nazarbaev win the Nobel Peace Prize, fortunately with no result to date.

Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

2,389 thoughts on “Blair and Kanye West are Prostitutes”

1 … 60 61 62 63 64 … 80
  • Kempe

    “If Galloway lied to parliament, and the evidence of this is readily available, why hasn’t he been banned?”

    They don’t ban people for telling lies in parliament, the place would be empty. An MP can however get banned for calling another MP a liar.

  • fedup

    I am tempted to recollect in the memory of the “dear Sweet reasonable modest knowledgeable all that is good and shines” habasomething and get into its mode of “debate”, then I saw Jon agonising and considering it his failure, to ban him.

    Jon you cannot blame yourself; every time a teenage scrot goes on the rampage and slashes a whole street rows worth of cars tyres, or smashes the expensive glass panes of shop windows or bus stops. Bad, unreasonable mendacious and nasty individuals are just that! No one can be blamed for their destructive influence and behaviour.

    However you know and I know that the current temporary loll in disruptions will be only that. After which soon there will be yet another keyboard commissar assigned to this blog spew unconscious drivel and utter nonsense; in the way of “defending” the “west”, and its surrogate bastards the zioufuckwits.

    I know you don’t much care for me, and well I am not the standard issue luvvie, but despite that I respect your judgement. Further I thank you for your efforts in trying to maintain a modicum of order in this chaotic hotbed of ideas, aspirations, hopes (thanks to a little guy with a huge stature, namely one Craig Murray), and a will to progress from the current pitiful corporate media diet of; half arsed sex, prejudice, special offers, and a steady stream of lies for the benefit of the fucking plutocrats who own the said corporate media.

    However may I suggest that for once we draw the line at the picking on the messenger instead of the message. All too often the techniques of the disruptive elements dispatched to rain shit on this blog has been simply attacking the individuals instead of countering with rebuttals to the views and outlooks that have been presented.

    ==
    Sofia here is something for your epony.

    Phil you are a star mate.

    Brian thanks for the links and advice mate.

  • Macky

    Anon: “I would suggest Jon gives Habbabkuk a second chance, and as compensation takes out the truly vile Krishnamurky. What say you, Jon?”

    Jon does delete Krishnamurky posts, even the non-inflammatory ones; funny thing though, if Krishnamurky didn’t exist, you & your fellow travelers would be denied a lot of whataboutery.

    Anon: “Macky, but let’s be honest – Medialens is a desperately dull site”

    a)You obviously don’t follow Medialens closely enough.
    b)If you mean that you can’t get away with posting inane and/or offensive posts, then yes it be very, very dull for you.

    Kempe: “Would that include foul language and implying that other posters are liars?”

    There are other ways to imply people are not being honest, it’s called rational reasoning & debating; there may be occasions where foul language is tolerated under moderating discretion, but to use it as purely an insult is not one of these.

    Kempe:”he said what he said then denied saying it”

    Despite what Nevermind reports as Craig saying about GG, in this clear example, he was not lying.

    So I’ll try once again to explain it, as your confusion seems to be due to misunderstanding the commonly accepted usage of the word “said”; when somebody is questioned or accused of having specially “said” a certain statement of fact in a political context, it’s taken as understood that the “said” equates to a declaration of certainty, ie he meant that Israel did supply the CW; however if this case, Galloway deliberately preference his remarks with “Here’s my theory….”

    Your problem seems to be that you are fixated upon the fact that the words “Israel gave them” that certainly left Galloway’s mouth as part of his clearly stated speculation, but this is not the charge that was put to him by the Tory MP in the commonly accepted meaning & usage of the word “said”, especially in the political context of the House of Commons setting.

    If you still really cannot see the difference, then the phrase, you can lead a horse to water, but not make it drink, would seem to be the apt comparison here, and I leave it with people with more patience & greater stamina to try & raise your political awareness level.

  • nevermind

    Thanks for that interesting picture of the eastern Med., Macky, it needs adding to, because since last week, when the USS Nimitz was said to steam through the red sea, this aircraft carrier has [probably reached its new Med. position.

    all this fire power is a powder keg and the sailors aboard get mightily frustrated after a few month of doing nothing but monitoring/spying on others intent and e traffic. This is not exciting and Israel does not shoot cruise missiles on a daily basis keeping these two superpowers busy.
    Should we expect shenanigans at sea? Gaza Peace convoys zigzagging through this armada of goodwill, freedom, liberty and apple pie?

    Well they could try and see whether the Russian or US will stop Israel shooting peaceful protesters in international waters, they shirley don’t give a damn about Gaza’s fishermen!

    Signed, Dreolin, its vital that Rafah reopens, because the tunnels are shut down and gaza’s population of 1.6 million are suffering from Israels extortionate pricing and controls.

  • fedup

    Macky, where are the Chinese ships at?

    There are supposed to be five Chinese destroyers and missile cruisers in the Med too, as per the sporadic reports around the net.

  • Nextus

    This board serves two competing roles: an open forum for public debate and an online community for people disaffected with the non-mainstream. When there is a flow of new posts from the blog owner, that pattern actually works well, usually morphing gradually from one to the other. People can file out of the ganghut as they please. But when things get fractious, the moderator faces some difficult decisions. I’m much in favour of embracing contrary voices (largely because, as Sofia pointed out, “functionally diverse groups outperform homogeneous groups”), but first and foremost we have to show support for the moderator who enables the discussion- sine qua non. Jon’s policy is to show more mutual respect (for people’s intelligence if not for their beliefs or morals) and I think everyone here should take more heed of that. The “ban” is not directed at particular contributors as much as at profane language, insults and accusations of ulterior motives.

  • A Node

    Kempe 15 Sep, 2013 – 12:53 pm

    “They don’t ban people for telling lies in parliament, the place would be empty. An MP can however get banned for calling another MP a liar.”

    They don’t call it ‘lying’, they call it ‘misleading the house’ and it is a ‘Contempt of ‘Parliament. It is a very serious offence and, if proved, is always punished, usually by the MP being banished from the house for a fixed period.

    “To mislead parliament is to present false information to parliament knowingly, a very serious charge in Westminster-style parliamentary assemblies.[1][2] Government ministers that are found to have misled parliament will generally lose their ministerial portfolio. By convention, a minister found to have misled parliament is expected to resign or face being sacked.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misleading_parliament

    So, once again, if Galloway lied to parliament, and the evidence of this is readily available, why hasn’t he been punished?

  • A Node

    Macky 5 Sep, 2013 – 1:04 pm

    “Kempe: “Would that include foul language and implying that other posters are liars?”

    There are other ways to imply people are not being honest, it’s called rational reasoning & debating; there may be occasions where foul language is tolerated under moderating discretion, but to use it as purely an insult is not one of these.

    Kempe:”he said what he said then denied saying it”

    Despite what Nevermind reports as Craig saying about GG, in this clear example, he was not lying.

    So I’ll try once again to explain it, as your confusion seems to be due to misunderstanding the commonly accepted usage of the word “said”; when somebody is questioned or accused of having specially “said” a certain statement of fact in a political context, it’s taken as understood that the “said” equates to a declaration of certainty, ie he meant that Israel did supply the CW; however if this case, Galloway deliberately preference his remarks with “Here’s my theory….”

    Your problem seems to be that you are fixated upon the fact that the words “Israel gave them” that certainly left Galloway’s mouth as part of his clearly stated speculation, but this is not the charge that was put to him by the Tory MP in the commonly accepted meaning & usage of the word “said”, especially in the political context of the House of Commons setting.

    If you still really cannot see the difference, then the phrase, you can lead a horse to water, but not make it drink, would seem to be the apt comparison here, and I leave it with people with more patience & greater stamina to try & raise your political awareness level.”

    Allow me to answer on Kempe’s behalf:

    Yeah, but … but … who cares what he said, he’s a liar

  • resident dissident

    Exexpat

    I don’t mind the rules if they are consistently enforced – if they were John Goss would now be banned for his inference that Habba and others (note the plural) who comment against the prevailing current of s*** are prostitutes. But I won’t hold my breath.

    Of course the moderator continues to leave accusations against Habba of a similar nature to those he claims that Habba made untouched.

    I’m sure you’ll now enjoy the lovely sound of one hand clapping – just like Medialens eh Macky. But just a thought for you all to ponder – don’t you possibly think that one of the reasons why progress is now being made in the sorry mess that is now Syria is because there has started to be some dialectic between the two sides of the argument – the Russian proposals did not just come out of mid air after of years of hardly lifting a finger to deal with their client state (my own guess is that know only too well that some elements of the Assad regime were responsible for the gassing) and Putin knows only too well that his (financial) interests only allow him to go so far in atagonising the West.

    It is quite noteworthy that not a wrod has said about Putin stuffing the ballots in the Moscow mayoral election to avoid a second rouynd of voting. Or how none of the self proclaimed non haters of the West (that is apart from those who have at least been honest enough to express their hatred). Just like no one felt it necessary to criticise Putin for his government’s racist mistreatment of immigrants – which went far beyond the level that John Goss used to apply the fascist label to Theresa May and to accuse British Governemnet of approaching fascism (and yes you did Mr Goss – look it up yourself)

    Or we could of course go to the posting to which Mr Goss linked twice and have a discussion about whether all the stuff at the end re the Rothschilds doesn’t really have the sort of anti-semitic subtext. Jon do you really want to link to such crap?

  • nevermind

    ” Just like no one felt it necessary to criticise Putin for his government’s racist mistreatment of immigrants – which went far beyond the level that John Goss used to apply the fascist label to Theresa May and to accuse British Governemnet of approaching fascism (and yes you did Mr Goss – look it up yourself) ”

    kempe, you have just pointed to Putin intentionally trying to defraud Navalny of becoming mayor of Moscow.
    If that is the case, put some meat on the bone and let us know a link to such defrauding.
    Blast, if it the case, it sounds very much like the postal voting fraud committed in Birmingham, Blackburn and elsewhere, ad nauseum.

    gis a link then.

  • resident dissident

    And while we are on the subject of cat man’s latest reincarnation as a slug in the pay of Assad TV

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/10278115/What-George-Galloway-neglected-to-mention-in-Syria-debate.html

    Perhaps we should remember that he once said this about the deeds of his latest paymaster

    https://www.facebook.com/notes/george-galloway-mp/a-statement-on-the-situation-in-syria-by-george-galloway/195231300540947

    Yep he was so shocked to his core that he had to rush off and get employment from the perpetrator of the deed, the salute of his indefatigability cannot be far behind. To any reasonable person the explanation can only be either prostitution or anti-westernism or possibly both. Perhaps Macky who carries something of a flame for the Gorgeous one might wish to elucidate.

  • resident dissident

    A node

    You really are a bear of little brain – GG is not a government minister and he hasn’t accused another MP of lying in the House (and if he did, he would withdraw the allegation pretty quickly.

    And btw Nevermind I am not Kempe – but perhaps we are all Habbacus! Would appreciate your thoughts on all the Rothchilds stuff that Mr Goss would like us to read.

  • nevermind

    “And btw Nevermind I am not Kempe – but perhaps we are all Habbacus! Would appreciate your thoughts on all the Rothchilds stuff that Mr Goss would like us to read.”

    Funny that, I had Kempe show on my computer, you playing footsie with us?
    Don’t mind if I discuss what is on offer here, far from me to dabble in dirty bankers history.

    Time for a new reformation and kicking over of the money lenders/bankers stalls. But this time we must not let them run away to their off shore safe havens.

  • resident dissident

    Putin vote rigging allegations

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/navalny-to-submit-truckload-of-complaints-to-elections-commission/485952.html

    http://navalny-en.livejournal.com/

    And while we are on the subject of the “richest man in the world” as he is commonly referred to by many Russians, perhaps those who were so rightly critical of the use of white phosphorus by the Israeli forces in Gaza might just want to do a little googling about its use in the Chechen conflict.

  • resident dissident

    Jon

    why has Habbakkuk been banned but not Krishnamurky – how has this anti-semite not crossed the moral lines that you wish to impose?

  • A Node

    resident dissident 5 Sep, 2013 – 3:08 pm

    “A node

    You really are a bear of little brain – GG is not a government minister and he hasn’t accused another MP of lying in the House (and if he did, he would withdraw the allegation pretty quickly.”

    You just made a fool of yourself. Read the previous posts or keep out of it.

  • resident dissident

    A Node

    Please provide a single example in recent times of where an MP, other than in the capacity as a Government minister has faced sanction for lying to or misleading the House in a statement they have made in the Chamber. The reason why many MPs will not challenge Galloway when he makes ridiculous statements is because they know that is exactly what he wants to happen.

  • Fred

    “I see Fred has issued a challenge to Jons moderation policy already.
    Interesting.”

    So long as you got the message that’s all that matters.

  • back room?

    What do people think about scraping this site to put some highlights up on i2p?

    i2p is the NSA-killer. They want content because content draws more users, and more users strengthen the security of the network. It takes a bit of patience to set up but then you’re routing traffic among your peers on your own network, not google’s or yahoo’s. That alone would slough off most of the dumber trolls. Technical support should not be a problem – there’s some serious IT chops in evidence among the regulars here.

    Everyone here has lots of idle CPU, so why not use it to blind NSA? Comments would have much-improved anonymity and a secure means of continuing discussions offline. That’s useful when people get down to brass tacks. People with offline sources get bashful on the NSA-sabotaged commercial internet.

    It’s ultimately Craig’s call because it’s his intellectual property.

  • nevermind

    RD “why has Habbakkuk been banned but not Krishnamurky – how has this anti-semite not crossed the moral lines that you wish to impose?”

    Thanks for link to Navalny’s blog, he seems to have a lot of supporters who are helping him to file complaints against those who committed election fraud.

    Where was your outrage when Birmingham’s postal voting fraud was discovered and what do you think has happened to the party whose candidates committed it?(nothing because the electoral commission is toothless))

    here is the report by Parliament.
    http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN03667.pdf‎

    And here Judge Mawry compares postal voting fraud to that of a banana republic, which gives republics a bad name. So what is your point? election frauds are everywhere there is power to be gained.

    http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/postal-voting-fraud-still-commons-183990

    Why do you think you can organise Jon’s time for him? Have some respect for the mod, he’s not here to communicate with posters, nor does he have to justify his moderation to you or me.

  • A Node

    RD and Kempe,

    Looks like we’ll soon find out who’s right.
    The website that claims to have started this smear reports that ….

    “Mike Freer MP today asked the Speaker of the House of Commons to rule on whether Galloway intentionally misled Britain’s lower legislative chamber during the debate.”

    http://www.trendingcentral.com/mp-demands-answers-of-galloway-lies/

    If Galloway is found to have lied, I’ll apologise to you. If he isn’t, perhaps you’ll do ‘the decent thing’.
    Mind you, I’m not too worried. The website’s headline puts “Galloway Lies” in inverted commas, and feels it necessary to shore up its case by falsely putting the word “implicating” into Offord’s question:

    When asked by Matthew Offord MP whether or not he made comments implicating Israel in the supply of chemical weapons to Al Qaeda in Syria, Galloway responded, “I said no such thing.”

  • Ben Franklin -Machine Gun Preacher (unleaded version)

    Heh. That reminds me of Geo Carlin’s confusion over the term ‘civil’ war.

    BOOM! “I’m so sorry”

    “Excuse me, sir” BLAM!

  • Villager

    Juteman @ 10h12, Anon @ 8h48 and Resident Dissident @ 15h26 you’ve nailed it on the head! This is what passes for moderation here and its roots lie well before the 10 months Jon alluded to in his speech.

    Foul language and abuse is okay here as long as it is deployed by pro-Palestine single-issue one-trick ponies. Google “ziofuckwits” for yourself, see what comes up. I encourage EVERYONE including lurkers to satisfy themselves and click on the link below to see a distinguished example of how illustrious this blog has become under Jon the Moderator’s watch:

    https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=nw#filter=0&hl=en&q=ziofuckwits&safe=off

    As long-time, balanced commenter here, Glenn_uk has said before, this Moderator is not fit-for-purpose. Though we all recognise that its the best Craig’s got.

    Jon admits that he has no context on George Galloway’s remarks (!!!!!). And then He “goes out on a bit of a limb” (????):

    “So, I’m going out on a bit of a limb, but I think 10 months of putting up with pointless whataboutery and spite is probably enough. It’s either that, or resign both moderation and technical button-pushing, frankly.”

    Yes Jon, i think you are a confused man, by your own admission. And confusion can only breed more confusion, which is what we are seeing. Take some responsibility.

    I am disgusted and shocked by your actions especially since:

    (a) you gave *no* warning to an intelligent, rational, generally respectful, eloquent and undoubtedly witty regular commenter,

    (b) you were, and if you weren’t you should have been, in reasonable doubt about the point that Habbabkuk was making and even how he was making it, and

    (c) you *failed* to take into account that Habbabkuk has had more abuse hurled upon him in these last 10 months than any other commenter has had *and endured* gracefully, probably in the history of this blog. He was the first, that i saw, to suggest here that unparliamentary language should be discouraged.

    Accordingly, i think you should do the right thing and retract that rarely-used ban immediately, forthwith. Your decision is an ill-considered (by your own admission), knee-jerk, irresponsible use of your ‘power’.

    Else, if you can’t see your mistake, then do the other right thing and go. This time not “on a bit of a limb”, but in grace. But if you decide to stay, you can rest fully assured that Macky & Co. will not any further be calling your ill-considered, loose-cannon moderation “shambolic. For, you have done their bidding.

    Well done chaps and chapesses, fantastic, now we see when your Revolution comes, how you will silence the intelligentsia in the guise of “whataboutery” and moans of “spite”. Enjoy your head-nodding, one-hand clapping echo chamber! For in the real world out here, life is good(!), and with President Obama stopping wars, early in his second-term, imho it is set to be even better!

    La vita e bella! 🙂

    ****************$
    PS Craig, look out, the zealots are taking over The Revolution!

1 … 60 61 62 63 64 … 80

Comments are closed.