I had fairly well concluded that the most likely cause was a fire disrupting the electrical and control systems, when CNN now say the sharp left turn was pre-programmed 12 minutes before sign off from Malaysian Air Traffic control, which was followed fairly quickly by that left turn.
CNN claim to have this from an US official, from data sent back before the reporting systems went off. It is hard to know what to make of it: obviously there are large economic interests that much prefer blame to lie with the pilots rather than the aircraft. But if it is true then the move was not a response to an emergency. (CNN went on to say the pilot could have programmed in the course change as a contingency in case of an emergency. That made no sense to me at all – does it to anyone else?)
I still find it extremely unlikely that the plane landed or crashed on land I cannot believe it could evade military detection as it flew over a highly militarized region. Somewhere there is debris on the ocean. There have been previous pilot suicides that took the plane with them; but the long detour first seems very strange and I do not believe is precedented. However if the CNN information on pre-programming is correct, and given it was the co-pilot who signed off to air traffic control, it is hard to look beyond the pilots as those responsible for whatever did happen. In fact, on consideration, the most improbable thing is that information CNN are reporting from the US official.
Also under development in France, the Future Combat Air System, an unmanned fighter drone also known as a UCAV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_nEUROn
Were Dassault/French Air Force and Navy testing jets in the area of the Germanwings crash on the day of the crash?
http://defense-update.com/20140127_rafale_omnirole_configuration.html#.VVDoDJOJe6Q
http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsfrench-air-force-tests-terrain-following-capability-on-single-seat-rafale-4551042
http://defense-update.com/20140127_rafale_omnirole_configuration.html#.VVDoDJOJe6Q
I don’t know Q I wasn’t following Jeff Wise’s website in 2014 only IG and TMF he did come up with the buried plane idea in Feb 2015 (link below) not sure that idea was viable.
http://jeffwise.net/2015/02/23/what-went-on-at-yubileyniy/
BTW Some updates ON DS
http://www.duncansteel.com/archives/date/2015/05/10
http://www.duncansteel.com/archives/date/2015/05/11
So if planes that disappear are just buried in the sand, all it takes is scratching the surface!
Nobody knows this better than I Q.
We’re close!
A US Marine corps helicopter has just disappeared, somewhere in Nepal. Was it shot down by mistake by a FRENCH fighter jet?
It is now confirmed. The disappearance of flight MH370 is a mystery. And there was a FRENCH passenger aboard!
http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-malaysia-airlines-370-story-so-far-htmlstory.html
The international search team has come up with a sunken 19th century ship, buried in sand on the floor of the Indian Ocean. At least their efforts have not been completely wasted.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/13/world/mh370-search-finds-shipwreck/
Maybe in the 22nd century, someone will find MH370. Will someone please dispatch the Fugro Equator to the Bay of Bengal?
Why MH370 still matters: the survivors of those who lost their loved ones.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/01/world/mh370-conversations-with-missing-wife/index.html
http://www.theweek.co.uk/57641/flight-mh370-what-might-happen-if-the-plane-is-found
If you wanted to write a script, the explanation for not wanting to look in the Bay of Bengal might come out as, “Har, matey, we’ve found treasure, our pieces of eight. Off with your scurvy ideas, or we’ll run you down the plank.”
They won’t look because they don’t want to find. They’re a-seeking gold and silver, don’t you know, gold, silver?! The fancy equipment is for romancing the high seas, and nought else will have it.
Or, as we said months ago, “Look here. Don’t look over there.”
@ Q
is that similar to not issuing the sketch of the motorcyclist who for fourteen months may have slaughtered at Le Martinet?
Wrong thread, MN. Here aircraft, not All’Hilli.
But that ‘sketch’ was released a long time ago, appeared on all the media in France and several in the Disunited Kingdom.
About MH370, I don’t know for sure but presumably whoever made the aircraft disappear managed not to leave a Q.
Bay of Bengal is not the best option. If you’re ready to discount the infamous pings and partial handshakes, why not look closer to where it got lost.
Cuz all the rest is vanity.
Incident involving Airbus and smaller craft at Birmingham, England
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/577625/Passenger-plane-aborts-landing-last-minute-Birmingham-Airport
who had mislaid a ship 🙂
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/520421/ship-tracking-hack-makes-tankers-vanish-from-view/
Oldies but goodies, hey? Oct 2013. Get laid, not mislaid
And yes, MN, 777s are now in the Airbus fleet.
OWL is the answer. What was the question?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11611058/Cybersecurity-researcher-made-plane-climb-after-hacking-in-flight-entertainment-system.html
And FRENCH suckers may believe this.
Yes, MN, one must not veer off the prewritten script.
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2015/01/18/mh370-is-it-time-to-investigate-the-investigators/
The mathematician mentioned works for an insurance company as an actuary. Have any other actuaries come forward, and if so, has this affected insurance settlements? This seems to be more of a personal interest for the actuary, or he would have mentioned his title and company name.
Humble apologies, 777 not an Airbus.
But Chris Robert is the new star (he could be FRENCH). Can he also hack into Amtrack. That’d be interesting.
Q Tips are needed for a better hearing of what happened to MH370.
Obviously, all those phony stories about pings and partial handshakes were just delusional.
Too bad our expert Herr James has also disappeared.
http://www.duncansteel.com/archives/1739
Northern Routes and the Burst Frequency Offset Values for MH370
by Victor Iannello
2015 May 18
Thank you for that, Pink. I’m glad to see that Duncan Steel has not forgotten the families of those who vanished without a trace on MH370.
So, thanks to VI, all lights are green, Pink. Just one question left.
What happened to MH370 once in Tajikistan?
That could easily provide a script for a sequel to the ‘Borat’ movie. Loved it.
To begin with, what does BFO stand for? Loonies try to sound like ‘scientists’. Butt Fucking Orientals? Please excuse my FRENCH.
There are a zillion ways data regarding MH370 may have been compromised, for a variety of reasons. Trying to elaborate on what has been ‘disclosed’ while questionning the ingenuity of reports is rather farcical.
BFO
http://theaviationist.com/tag/burst-frequency-offset/
Software link to Airbus crash
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-32810273
Bad soft ware and then hard landing, thanks to the FRENCH.
About BFO, I’m a true blue, Pink.
But even on the link you provide, people seem to discount that type of pseudo-science BS.
” The arcs corresponding to each “ping” are concentric circles all centered on the stationary geocentric satellite. So there is complete north south symmetry, and any track to the south would have a mirror image track to the north that would fit the same data, including the doppler shift data. ”
So basically nobody knows anything from that type of so-called expertise.
Better ask the FRENCH. At least they managed to find where their Rio-Paris crash happened.