The revelation that undercover Met officers spied on the family of Jean Charles De Menezes after they murdered him, leaves me utterly appalled.
You have to consider this in the context of the lies that the Met assiduously spread about De Menezes – that he entered the tube without buying a ticket, that he vaulted the ticket gates, that he ran away from officers, that he was wearing a bulky jacket.
All of these were lies. In truth the poor man had entered the tube normally and legally, walked calmly and sat down with a free newspaper. He wore a short tight denim jacket. Then totally without any cause or justification from his actions whatsoever, his murderers shot him multiple times in the head. Just because his Brazilian complexion looked a bit Arab.
I can think of no category of lie worse than that told by a murderer against the reputation of their victim.
The police did everything they could to mislead the media, planting lies and encouraging stories they knew to be untrue. Personally I find it extremely suspicious that numerous CCTV cameras were found not to be working, and have little doubt that the police destroyed that evidence.
There can be no other motive for spying on De Menezes’ family than either the hope of gaining information to feed to the media to discredit the man they murdered, or to attempt to pervert the course of justice.
They did not have to worry – their were plenty of others to pervert the course of justice for them, including the DPP and above all, Sir Michael Wright, as disgusting a piece of scum as ever sat on an English bench, who directed the inquest jury that they could not return a verdict of unlawful killing. (I was delighted to find that, when I googled Sir Michael Wright, my article on him came high on the first page. Is that result tailored by Google for me, or is it general?)
The recent revelation that the Met spied on Menezes’ family sparked very little public interest. It should. It is a still more appalling outrage than the Murdoch press hacking Millie Dowler. At least the Murdoch gang had not actually murdered Millie Dowler themselves. The De Menezes family were being spied on by their son’s and brother’s murderers.
KingofWelshNoir, 11:56 am; thanks for that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Reconnaissance_Regiment#Shooting_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes
The Special Reconnaissance Regiment. They’re the ones trained to stab themselves through the mouth with their own sword:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/Special_Reconnaissance_Regiment_%28crest%29.jpg
John Goss
“What a terrible tragedy this was for Jean Charles’ family! What can we expect from a country that has enacted 8 anti-terror acts since the turn of the century, mostly targeting Muslims, though of course this young man was just mistaken for a Muslim.”
It ought to be said that the spying on Menezes’ family came to light as a result of an inquiry, that the Met itself told the family’s lawyer about the spying and that it has been reported throughout the media. The family will now be given a large compensation pay out.
All of which is, of course, is in stark contrast to Brazil, Russia or any of the other countries preferred by the MWL on here, where innocent people are regularly gunned down by police and it isn’t even reported.
“@Anon: Sorry to cut in on this, but the “hoaxers” are probably a smokescreen. ”
Is this a conspiracy on top of a conspiracy? Are you saying that the Powers That Be (PTB) have planted hologram hoaxers within the Truth Movement to divert attention from what really happened, that the American government brought the buildings down in a controlled demolition?
Sickening propaganda to make acceptable the unbearable reality;
Please, Passerby, I’m trying to eat my lunch!
Clark, yes they were also the ones caught at the police checkpoint in Iraq dressed as Arabs in a car full of explosives. They tried to shoot their way out, got arrested, and the British Army busted them out of jail Wild West style.
LOL, Anon! If you can’t be bothered to engage with me, then perhaps you may be aware of Fahrenheit 9/11. Did you think that was a pack of lies?
Hi Peacewisher
No I don’t know about ‘Farenheit 9/11’. Is it a book or a film? Perhaps you could outline for me some of the central points and then we can engage.
9/11 No photo of a plane hitting Pentagon
7/7 CCTV footage of mysterious car removed from camera at Luton Station and other inconsistencies.
Just for a couple of examples.
I think you do, Anon.
Anon
Don’t be so conspiracy smeary.
To simply dismiss the possibility of state operations which propagate extreme theories to undermine real theories about state business is plain stupid. Or do you still believe the alien abduction stories?
Menzies was not killed by mistake. He was an engineer on the London Underground and saw something that he was not supposed to have seen prior to 7/7. Why else would there be such a huge conspiracy to cover up his killing and promote all senior met officers for a job well done!
Here’s a nice picture, Anon. Maybe they are all extras paid for by Michael Moore…
https://twitter.com/Polka_bug/status/493008681722998784/photo/1
The police sometimes respond to intelligence information with excessive adrenalin because alerts have been triggered in the system. They find it extremely difficult to switch off the adrenalin if the security alert turns out to be a false alarm.
Sometimes my own persecutors (who are trying to stop the self-evident truth of Islam taking hold in the UK), react unprofessionally to me winding them up. They are simply not capable of digesting our exposure of the truth and their masters’ false-flag monster of Muslim extremism at the same time.
I once burned out a customer’s Rolls Royce computer because I had left the foot-controlled handbrake on. I just thought the car was not working very well. Rolls Royce do not admit to faults in their machines. Similarly with the police with Jean Charles De Menenes, poor soul.
At the time of his murder, we weren’t supposed to know about NSA and GCHQ spying or false-flag terrorism, so an investigation into human error would have exposed too many secrets about Her Majesty’s methods of staying on her stinky FID. DEF. throne.
“missing CCTV footage of 9/11 and 7/7”
The key missing CCTV footage re 911 is footage of the Pentagon incident. Several cameras will have caught it but we’ve only been allowed to see four measly frames, which show nothing of note, not even a plane.
The key missing CCTV footage re 7/7 is footage of the alleged bombers getting on the train at Luton or alighting at King’s Cross on the morning in question. We’ve only been allowed to see one measly frame of them entering Luton station, but this appears to have been doctored and may date from an earlier occasion.
There are odd bits of CCTV footage that do exist but I believe the above are the main missing items.
“Menzies was not killed by mistake. He was an engineer on the London Underground and saw something that he was not supposed to have seen prior to 7/7.”
What did he see, Khan. Do tell.
Hi MJ
What do you think really happened on 7/7? As far as I can recall the bombers posted video evidence of their intentions online, but perhaps you have an alternative theory?
How defiant of the Evening Standard:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/thousands-line-the-streets-in-london-for-propalestine-protest-as-12hour-ceasefire-is-held-in-gaza-9630516.html
He was an engineer on the London Underground and saw something that he was not supposed to have seen prior to 7/7.
Khan or anyone – have you some evidence to back this. I want to advise my friends at J7.
These are the Jean Charles de Menezes Inquest Transcripts & Evidence from the J7 site.
http://julyseventh.co.uk/j7-jean-charles-de-menezes-inquest/index.html
Credit & special thanks to Ant & Bridget xx
Peacewisher
Hand on heart I have never heard of ‘Farenheit 9/11’. Could you please provide a rough outline of what it is about and then perhaps we can engage in a discussion.
Sir Michael Wright is a paid up member of the Establishment, also a Freemason. He is not about to upset the applecart and put his cosy little sinecure in danger. The Security service also have some compromising material as to his strange peccadiloes. Do not expect justice in British Court of Law.If you are up against the System. you are guilty unless you have friends in HIGH PLACES as in the Rebekah Brooks farce.
Another good reason for Scottish Independece.
“What do you think really happened on 7/7?”
Sorry, I have no theories. I was just drawing attention to the missing evidence. If there was reliable footage of them boarding at Luton and alighting at King’s Cross at certain times I’d doubtless surmise that they got on and off at those times and locations, which would be a start.
Prerecorded videos posted online are not evidence of what actually happened that day, CCTV footage is.
Anon 26 Jul, 2014 – 12:45 pm
“I’ve heard it said that 9/11 was a hoax and there were in fact no planes. Are you expounding no planes theory” or the hologram version?”
Are those the only conspiracy theories about 911 that you’ve heard, Anon?
If so, you should do some research rather than display your ignorance.
If not, you reveal a lot about yourself by referencing those theories rather than more plausible ones.
Node
“You reveal a lot about yourself by referencing those theories rather than more plausible ones.”
For crying out loud, Node! All I want to know about is the more plausible theories. Can you separate the wheat from the chaff here, enlighten me as to what really happened, because no one seems forthcoming.
Anon does not repeat, does not do subtlety there is a need for crayons and drawing pads.
Anyone else on here never heard of “Fahrenheit 9/11”?
Thanks Craig, this story goes to the heart of solit loyalties and vested interests thnat are ripping the whole system apart.
The Met, public services, police in general, are still harbouring one of the least tackled discrepancies today which covers up some hiodeous crimes and which should be the issue to tackle in the 21st century.
FREEMASONRY! Men who pledge an oath of loyalty to a secret society of men. They should now be outed as what they are, manipulators of the law, of regulations and of society.
Name a freemason today! Public services should work to serve us all, women, children and men. Freemasonry and party politics both have ruined Britain. Peadophiles could get away with what they were doing because they were protected by these secret organisation, pervading the MI’s and their hold on the establishment, their influence in the appointment of just about anyone in the public sphere, safe hands to keep up the facade.
Thanks for this Craig.
BTW. Is the Met telling us that they did not have a phonefix on to whoever accessed Millie’s phone and/or manipulated her personal account?
I think that the whole inquiery into this sad saga was cut short because it threatened to stop Scotland Yard from working, with corridors full of vitally shredded materials blocking the day to day workplace….
And for what it might have exposed. One could say that this country, ala Belgium, is covering up a huge scandal, and the Met, and other forces are up to their necks in it.
Am I the only one who thinks this? I let you answer the question.
that is ‘split loyalties’
Anon 26 Jul, 2014 – 2:21 pm
“For crying out loud, Node! All I want to know about is the more plausible theories. Can you separate the wheat from the chaff here, enlighten me as to what really happened, because no one seems forthcoming.”
Please answer my question: are those two 911 theories you referenced the only 911 conspiracy theories that you have heard?