The revelation that undercover Met officers spied on the family of Jean Charles De Menezes after they murdered him, leaves me utterly appalled.
You have to consider this in the context of the lies that the Met assiduously spread about De Menezes – that he entered the tube without buying a ticket, that he vaulted the ticket gates, that he ran away from officers, that he was wearing a bulky jacket.
All of these were lies. In truth the poor man had entered the tube normally and legally, walked calmly and sat down with a free newspaper. He wore a short tight denim jacket. Then totally without any cause or justification from his actions whatsoever, his murderers shot him multiple times in the head. Just because his Brazilian complexion looked a bit Arab.
I can think of no category of lie worse than that told by a murderer against the reputation of their victim.
The police did everything they could to mislead the media, planting lies and encouraging stories they knew to be untrue. Personally I find it extremely suspicious that numerous CCTV cameras were found not to be working, and have little doubt that the police destroyed that evidence.
There can be no other motive for spying on De Menezes’ family than either the hope of gaining information to feed to the media to discredit the man they murdered, or to attempt to pervert the course of justice.
They did not have to worry – their were plenty of others to pervert the course of justice for them, including the DPP and above all, Sir Michael Wright, as disgusting a piece of scum as ever sat on an English bench, who directed the inquest jury that they could not return a verdict of unlawful killing. (I was delighted to find that, when I googled Sir Michael Wright, my article on him came high on the first page. Is that result tailored by Google for me, or is it general?)
The recent revelation that the Met spied on Menezes’ family sparked very little public interest. It should. It is a still more appalling outrage than the Murdoch press hacking Millie Dowler. At least the Murdoch gang had not actually murdered Millie Dowler themselves. The De Menezes family were being spied on by their son’s and brother’s murderers.
агитации is a two-edged sword. Get the military dimbulbs in a lather, and there’s no telling what might happen
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/07/27/stranglehold-on-america/
because witch hunts are fun for the whole family.
“2/ Given that your posts reveal that you have anger issues, can you assure us that you were not doing time – perhaps for assault and battery? – without access to the internet during the six months or so you fell silent in this blog? I feel we should know where you’re coming from, so to speak.”
A good observation, Habbabkuk. However I have an alternative theory. Fedup had major issues before his departure, decided to leave the blog after he became a total embarrassment to the residences, returned months later and for a while, realizing what a prick he had been before, attempted to be normal. However, he couldn’t keep this facade up for long and within about a week or so had reverted to type. He is either permanently pissed or raving mad, perhaps both.
That said you may well be right as six months is the usual period of incarceration for assault.
Komodo
Good to see you on the weekend, when normally you are too esteemed and important to comment.
I was wondering, could you please update readers with your progress in forming protest groups outside synagogues? I would particularly like to know what measures the Israeli government has taken to deal with your campaign and whether you have been engaged in any direct talks with Netanyahu or the Americans.
Did I hear some weasel whistling?
Your discrete threats of ‘be careful’ was the start, now you are stalking me, in your own stupid form.
I have answered Anons leading question, although it was stupid enough to be ignored, now you chime up with your arsefaceueberalles comments here.
@Moderators What if the weasels name was known, and rather than addressing his moniker, we were able to use his full name and look up his address, etc. etc. and much more.
Would you like this to happen here? Just as this has happened here?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gaza-war-saw-antisemitic-attacks-rise–to-record-high-1889936.html
a phenomena that has happened in this country since the prgrom of 1411, when jews were burned, such as happened in the Cow tower in Norwich, for example.
Maybe you two would like to address this phenomena of historic British Jew hatred before you start pissing in the wind, you two wannabe fascists you.
“Thank you for reminding us all that we cannot mention, talk, contemplate to mention, think of ever mentioning the word J-w, for the powerful lobby that protects the almighty supreme beings has thus forbidden us the lowly goyem cattle from ever thinking to mention mention…” etc
No one’s stopping you, Fedup. Just carry right on!
Why is the word Jew seen as a slur? I see all kinds of gymnastics to avoid like ‘jewish’ as though they are not fully Jew, but only partial like a foot or a small contribution of genes.
Jews have no reason to be ashamed of the name they’re carried for thousands of years. Now when you say Zionist; them’s fightin’ words pardnah.
ood to see you on the weekend, when normally you are too esteemed and important to comment.
Why, thank you, and it is good to know you appreciate my input sufficiently to monitor my routine. But I don’t have a routine, so you are probably wasting your time as usual,
I was wondering, could you please update readers with your progress in forming protest groups outside synagogues? I would particularly like to know what measures the Israeli government has taken to deal with your campaign and whether you have been engaged in any direct talks with Netanyahu or the Americans.
I have formed a little group called Neonazi Antisemitic Eminences Against All Jews Everywhere, and we have already had some success in burning a yarmulke. We had to use a lot of petrol. And it smelt foul. I spoke to an American last week. He wanted directions to the car park. We received start-up funding from BICOM, on Israeli instructions*. Hope that helps.
IOW, piss off, troll.
*90% of our membership consists of agents provocateurs. This is a matter of some pride.
Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !
27 Jul, 2014 – 2:07 pm
“If you are really unable to restraint [please use a spelling and grammar programme] yourself, perhaps YOU could be constructive and help Anon by providing a summary of the plot of Fahrenheit 9/11?”
Why does Anon need help? Is he an idiot?
Any normal person, before engaging in debate, would research the subject at hand.
Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !
27 Jul, 2014 – 2:12 pm
“Also some free Palestine demonstrators have taken to spraying swastikas on public monuments, wearing football shirts with the name ‘Hitler’ on the back and waving placards saying ‘Hitler was right’.
I doubt that. More likely to be a Zionist false flag as happens frequently in the USA.
“Why are all Jews hated like this for the actions of the Israeli government?”
Firstly, the Israeli government are all Jewish, every single one.
Secondly, I ask, why are all Arabs, particularly Palestinians, hated (and being punished) by the Zionists for the actions of Hitler?
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Swastika_vandalism
“Metapedia is a multilingual “pro-European” electronic encyclopedia which states that it focuses on culture, art, science, philosophy and politics. It contains white nationalist, white supremacist, Neo-Nazi, and far-right points of view.
The site has more than 15,000 articles in English and has versions in seventeen European languages. Topics covered include European history, Norse mythology, and white nationalist music. The Register states that “a good percentage of Metapedia’s content seems to be dedicated to Woden, the White Order of Thule, runes, and other subject matter which would undoubtedly have found favour with Aryan hocus-pocus aficionado Heinrich Himmler.” Crítica de la Argentina says it has glowing descriptions of Adolf Hitler and other Nazi figures. Daniel Goldhagendescribes it as seeking “to create (currently in 18 languages) an anti-Semitic informational universe.”
According to the North Rhine-Westphalian Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Metapedia’s articles are characterized by historical revisionism and lauding Nazi Germany. For this reason, the German Federal Department for Media Harmful to Young Persons (Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien) started an indexing process — that is, it is considering declaring Metapedia “harmful to young people”. In early 2007, within half a year of the launching of the original Swedish version, Metapedia received much Swedish media attention for its similarity to Wikipedia and some of its contents, in particular for its positive characterization of many Nazi German personalities, for cataloguing Jews in Swedish media, and for characterizing Swedish companies as either “Swedish-owned” or “Jewish-owned”. This led to an investigation being initiated in Sweden, in which the Chancellor of Justice(Justitiekanslern) examined whether the site should be prosecuted for inciting hatred or for violating the Privacy Law (Personuppgiftslagen). After reviewing the site’s contents, the Chancellor of Justice decided to terminate investigations, since nothing had been found that violated the Freedom of Speech Act (Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagen) or the Privacy Law. In January 2009, in a response to further attention given to the site, the Swedish Chancellor of Justice opined that Metapedia presented a positive image of Adolf Hitler, but decided not to restart an investigation, since this was not illegal.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapedia
Your bedtime reading, Node?
The war on newborns; more pornographic than any discredited symbol.
link….http://instagram.com/p/q7WZmgnEAn/
Komodo
“I have formed a little group called Neonazi Antisemitic Eminences Against All Jews Everywhere, and we have already had some success in burning a yarmulke.”
Well done fella.
Now how are things going with those synagogue protests? Last we heard you wanted to form protest groups outside synagogues which generously “move apart” to allow Jews to enter and exit their place of worship, presumably whilst giving them some pretty nasty stares. Have you managed to gather many comrades yet?
Doug
It’s not much to ask. If you believe in Fahrenheit 9/11 then you ought not to be ashamed of providing me with a brief summary. I really can’t understand why there is so much reluctance among various commenters here to come forward with their beliefs regarding 9/11 and 7/7. What are you so afraid of?
I took a look at Metapedia. Disgusting.
Then there’s this sort of stuff:
http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/f/fe/Picsimages081jx6.jpg
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:Urban_jungle.jpg
And here’s an excerpt from a a source used for that article, referring to Africans and their descendants:
Node?
“Also some free Palestine demonstrators have taken to spraying swastikas on public monuments, wearing football shirts with the name ‘Hitler’ on the back and waving placards saying ‘Hitler was right’.
I doubt that. More likely to be a Zionist false flag as happens frequently in the USA.”
Yes, that’s right Doug. Just deny anything that you find inconvenient and call it a “Zionist false flag”. Silly twerp.
Doug
“”Why are all Jews hated like this for the actions of the Israeli government?”
Firstly, the Israeli government are all Jewish, every single one.”
Lol. Do you hold the world’s Muslims or Christians responsible for the actions of the governments of Muslim or Christian countries? You really are a racist turd.
Anon: <i"Metapedia… Neo-Nazi … blah, blah blah …. "
= I can’t dispute the substance of your link, Node, so I’ll attack the messenger.
Node, I’m looking for substance for that link. It has so far led only to race-hatred sources. I’ll keep trying, but please tell me what you think of Metapedia.
Now how are things going with those synagogue protests? Last we heard you wanted to form protest groups outside synagogues which generously “move apart” to allow Jews to enter and exit their place of worship, presumably whilst giving them some pretty nasty stares. Have you managed to gather many comrades yet?
Why would this matter to you? You sound really worried by the idea of peaceful assembly in a public place to protest the immorality of the Jewish State’s behaviour. That fits. Worry on.
Honestly, this is easier than the Bekaa Valley turkey shoot. What happened to the competition?
Anon, unfair on Doug Scorgie. You asked about hatred of Jews in general, got an answer, and then assumed hatred on Doug Scorgie’s part.
Clark,
I googled “swastika vandalism by jews”. That page came up. Do you dispute any of the incidents it lists?
“Why would this matter to you? You sound really worried by the idea of peaceful assembly in a public place to protest the immorality of the Jewish State’s behaviour. That fits. Worry on.”
Would you rally outside a mosque in Britain in response to the actions of an Islamic state? If not, on what grounds do you believe British Jews should be subject to protests outside their places of worship?
Node, I dispute the first example so far, as the original source… You check it out. Metapedia is disgusting.
Node, someone told me Wikipedia was “useless”, pointing out it the politics of Jimmy Wales. It was months or more ago. Was that you?
I am not surprised that the Met spied of the family of the person they killed to try and find some dirt on him. When they do something bad, the best way to make it look not so bad is to make the victim look bad.
This is why the supporters of Israel also attack Muslims who have no connection with Palestine. To say, “Yes we kill Palestinian babies, but it is not so bad because they are Muslim and Muslims are all bad people”.
Node
“Do you dispute any of the incidents it lists?”
Yes. Quickly looking at only the first story on the list: The NY Times says the “suspect is Russian Orthodox”, the NY Sun says “Ms. Abramovich, who is Russian Orthodox” and the NY Post says “Abramovich is Russian Orthodox”. So not Jewish at all then.
Would you rally outside a mosque in Britain in response to the actions of an Islamic state?
Rather depends, really. If the Islamic state had been terrorising a captive population of dispossessed refugees in a ghetto for a decade or two, then maybe yes, if nothing else worked, and if the Jewish state, which was itself founded (and funded) on the back of similar persecution of the Jews, hadn’t grabbed my attention first. One thing at a time.
If not, on what grounds do you believe British Jews should be subject to protests outside their places of worship?
Well, even if so, it depends what you mean by ‘should’, doesn’t it? I’m quite certain that British Jews would object strenuously to the idea. On the other hand, if it pricks their consciences into restraining the terrorist state most of them support, if only as an ideal (an extremely flawed one), then hell, yeah. It will save lives and mitigate the ongoing misery of their intended victims.
And it would be better than barricading the gates of the synagogue during worship and using it for artillery practice, wouldn’t it? The guards don’t part to let the people through at Eilat or Rafah…all heart, me.
And now a word from our sponsor (I wish).
http://www.map-uk.org/
GIVE.