A Horror We Made 589


We are directly responsible for the disasters in the Mediterranean. The bombing of Libya into failed state status is now coming back to haunt us. The ludicrous idea, propounded by Blair, Robert Cooper and the Henry Jackson Society, that you could improve dictatorial states by massive bombing campaigns that targeted their basic infrastructure, is now a total bust. Sadly so are Iraq and Libya, to the permanent detriment of many millions of people. We caused both the Islamic State and the Mediterranean boat disasters, and we caused them with bombs.

But the lack of any effective policing is only part of the problem. What makes people so desperate that they are prepared to give all of the small amount they own, to ruthless gangs, in exchange for a dreadful sea crossing with a one in ten chance of drowning? Most of the refugees are sub-Saharan African. We only see the European end of the saga, not the terrible conditions on the cross Saharan journeys that they start with.

There will be no security anywhere if the world does not address the terrible scourge of African poverty and under-development. That is a huge subject on which I have written extensively and worked much of my life, and I do not wish to open it here. But what it does show is the utter stupidity – inhumanity yes, but also stupidity – of UKIP in thinking that cutting development aid will increase the economic security of the UK.


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

589 thoughts on “A Horror We Made

1 8 9 10 11 12 20
  • lysias

    Since the only thing I know for sure about what happened on 9/11 is that the official account of what happened is a pack of lies, I refuse to criticize accounts of what happened as long as they reject the official account. For all I know, any of them might be true.

  • lysias

    I just read over lunch an article in the latest issue of The American Conservative (May/June 2015) by William S. Lind entitled “Why Soldiers Lie”. I quote one particularly memorable paragraph:

    The larger problem, again, is less what the generals do than what they do not do. They preside smugly over a cluster of institutional disasters, like so many Soviet industrial managers — which is what most of them are.

    When I recently expressed on this forum the belief that the United States might collapse as suddenly as the Soviet Union did, I met with some disbelief. I repeat that belief here. Once a system becomes too reliant on lies, even in an area where honesty is as necessary as it is in the military, it probably cannot correct itself.

  • Mark Golding

    Craig’s knowledge of Africa together with Humza Yousaf’s thoughts on international development, forged with empathy after the Iraq war, seems to be a door into a parallel universe of good vibrations.

    Sadly this parallel route is blocked by English voter apathy and dispassionateness made worse by a vindictive ground war of insults and gibes in which nothing of substance is said by the main political parties to whack the tax scandals by banks and corporates and free, smooth and soften the world of food banks, zero-hours contracts, high energy bills, benefit sanctions, closed libraries, clogged up A&E units (my wife waited 8hrs yesterday) and student debt.

    We have taken a quantum leap to disconnection brought on by ‘backside politics’ clearly marked by a Conservative/Labour admission that it is for the stingy few I call the ‘middle’, protecting their pensions, business interests, property, land and lucrative private rented properties. The ‘middle’ will vote and frantically bring out the big guns i.e. the likes of John Major and others, in a calculated contempt against openness and honesty to keep silent on spending plans (defence etc), to say nothing, give nothing away(i.e. IDS’s next savage £12 billion cut to the welfare budget) and shun those groups ‘backside algorithms’ predict won’t bother to vote.

    Notice this election is all about what has been achieved and what has been ruined by the opposition; it is a deadly Con! – it gives little or no coherent information about what will be done in the future.

    The past is knowable while the future dangerously not.

    Is my statement bullsh*t? I f ‘yes’ I ask you to think about the £9000 tuition fees, think about bedroom tax, think about the total reorganisation of the NHS and 40 per cent cuts in local government, think about divide and rule.

    Do you register to vote? Fill out a form, get someone to help you, go on-line to enter? If you did not then start demanding answers about nothing; back-side politics is out to screw you with the old binary views of the past.

    There is no revolution. Back-side politics has already won the day.

  • Daniel

    “WTC7 100 yards long collapsed simultaneously at each end and along its ENTIRE length in free fall . Very matzo dem steel columns.”

    One word: “Bollocks”.

  • Truther999

    WTC7 100 yards long collapsed simultaneously at each end and along its ENTIRE length in free fall . Very matzo dem steel columns.”

    One word: “Bollocks”.

    Daniel – Watch the demolition on you tube, its definitely not kosher ! Did you seen the dress rehearsal pics in the Negev during your last visit?

  • Daniel

    “Since the only thing I know for sure about what happened on 9/11 is that the official account of what happened is a pack of lies, I refuse to criticize accounts of what happened as long as they reject the official account. For all I know, any of them might be true.”

    The reported flaws in the official 9-11 account doesn’t mean that alternative narratives, in the absence of evidence, have any legitimacy.

  • lysias

    Just as the U.S. is ending sanctions against Cuba, it is imposing them on Venezuela, with the ridiculous claim that Venezuela represents a national security threat. (Obama and an aide have since repudiated the claim that Venezuela is a national security threat, but they have not rescinded the sanctions.) I suspect that imposing those new sanctions was the quid pro quo the national security state demanded in return for allowing the rapprochement with Cuba.

  • lysias

    Well, obviously, if the official account of 9/11 is a pack of lies, some alternative account must be true.

  • Daniel

    Daniel – Watch the demolition on you tube, its definitely not kosher?

    I have seen clips on you tube numerous times and it doesn’t prove any demolition took place. In fact, I’ve seen clips from different positions and angles that prove without doubt that it WASN’T a demolition. I also saw with my own eyes planes which struck the WTC.

  • lysias

    I also saw with my own eyes planes which struck the WTC.

    You were in New York, Daniel?

  • Daniel

    “Well, obviously, if the official account of 9/11 is a pack of lies, some alternative account must be true.”

    Well, you can leave out the notion the towers were brought down by controlled explosives as part of any alternative account.

  • lysias

    For planes to have actually struck the twin towers is by no means inconsistent with independent controlled demolition, especially of the different building WTC7 hours later.

  • Becky Cohen

    @Habbabkuk (la vita è bella: “And in the Argentine, moreover, every citizen is guaranteed a blustering loudmouth as Head of State, be it a man (Senor Kirchner) or a woman (Senora Kirchner).
    By the way, and off-topic, it is said that Senora Kirchner enjoys the (intimate) company of a man half her age. Whoaaarr :)”

    Isn’t that the double standard though, Habbabkuk? If a woman does that she’s derided and ridiculed, yet if a bloke bags a woman half his age he’s lionized as a ‘stud muffin’….isn’t that right, Craig?;)

  • lysias

    I also saw with my own eyes planes which struck the WTC.

    Well, I was in D.C. that day, so I saw nothing with my own eyes, not even whatever happened at the Pentagon a couple of miles away. All I have ever seen is pictures on TV after the fact, and such pictures, as we all know, can lie.

  • Daniel

    “For planes to have actually struck the twin towers is by no means inconsistent with independent controlled demolition, especially of the different building WTC7 hours later.”

    That’s true even, if highly unlikely. The bottom line is there is no evidence that 7 was brought down by controlled explosives.

  • lysias

    By the way, when 9/11 happened, it was a few years after I had worked in the Pentagon myself, so I knew people who were still working at the Pentagon on 9/11. No one has confirmed to me that he or she saw a plane strike the building that day.

  • Truther999

    Once again- WTC7 100yds x 77yds simultaneously collapsed at ALL 4 corners and along its entire length in symmetrical FREE FALL, despite all those steel columns holding up the 47 stories, elementary physics my dear Watsonstein ! Forget the kim kardashian cattle breed even the zebu cattle are no longer fooled.

  • Daniel

    “All I have ever seen is pictures on TV after the fact, and such pictures, as we all know, can lie.”

    Then you might want to ask yourself why after 14 years not one among the thousands of witnesses on that day have come forward to say that planes did not really smash into buildings after all. Having revealed it didn’t really happen would have made them financially rich. Moreover, not one government official or journalist has come forward to substantiate the “hoax”. Where do you suppose the hoax was filmed and who directed it?

  • RobG

    @Glenn
    22 Apr, 2015 – 1:59 am

    I replied to Anon1 in the way I did because many people fall for such crude propaganda. Just look at royal events (particularly royal babies) and watch the hoardes of plebs waving Union Jacks.

    Of course, most readers of this blog are a bit more sophisticated than that; but not all.

    The media has now become one huge Establishment/corporate propaganda machine (including the likes of the Guardian), and cyberspace is invaded by armies of trolls, all taking a buck to lie to the public. Morality and integrity? what’s that!

    That’s what we’re up against, those of us who seek a better future for humanity, and those of us who seek to prevent the psychos and loons from destroying this little blue planet of ours.

    The human race is on last orders as it is.

    Have I mentioned the fact that the Pacific Ocean is not so slowly dying?

  • Daniel

    “Once again- WTC7 100yds x 77yds simultaneously collapsed at ALL 4 corners and along its entire length in symmetrical FREE FALL, despite all those steel columns holding up the 47 stories, elementary physics my dear Watsonstein ! Forget the kim kardashian cattle breed even the zebu cattle are no longer fooled.”

    I found an interesting set of videos which show the 911 buildings falling. They are shot from different angles and they clearly show building 7 does not fall straight down and that building 1 falls from the top first.
    http://ae911truth.info/wordpress/ae911truths-case/collapse/collapse-symmetry/

    It was Galileo who dropped two cannon balls of different mass off the tower of Pisa and found that they both arrived on the ground at the same time. Therefore WTC 1 and 2 did NOT freefall because debris which was in freefall arrived on the ground first.

    In terms of the numbers of architects and engineers who support the claims of the 9-11 truth movement, here’s a sober reminder of the context of such “support”. The United States Census Bureau reported in 2008 that there are 233,000 architects in the United States and 2,495,000 engineers in the United States. Only 1,761 out of 2,728,000 joined Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth. That’s 0.065% of the total.

    And i haven’t even looked at whether the architects and engineers listed were in fields in any way relevant to the WTC.

  • lysias

    I will admit that planes probably struck the twin towers, but I have learned that the U.S. government lies about so much, I am unwilling to say that I am convinced even of that. I suspect not many people themselves saw at least the first plane strike.

    By the way, it’s remarkable how few people there are who say they themselves saw a plane strike the Pentagon,and the sole video the U.S. government has released that allegedly shows this is not very convincing.

  • RobG

    Here are some radiation high levels across North America, from last week – mostly gamma counts, where 50 counts per minute (CPM) is ‘alert status’:

    309 CPM Boston, MA
    217 CPM New York City
    426 CPM Raleigh, NC
    258 CPM Atlanta, GA
    424 CPM Miami, FL
    214 CPM Chicago, IL
    227 CPM St Paul, MN
    365 CPM Lincoln, NE, Gamma and Beta Radiation Combined CPM.
    264 CPM Des Moines, IA
    332 CPM Aberdeen, SD
    493 CPM Rapid City, SD
    388 CPM Kansas City, KA
    315 CPM Tulsa, OK
    435 CPM Little Rock, AR
    206 CPM Dallas, TX
    261 CPM Lubbock, TX
    410 CPM South Valley, NM
    400 CPM Albuquerque, NM
    529 CPM Grand Junction, CO
    875 CPM Billings, MT
    333 CPM Phoenix, AZ
    352 CPM Tucson, AZ
    148 CPM Las Vegas, NV
    324 CPM San Diego, CA
    312 CPM Los Angeles, CA
    225 CPM San Francisco, CA
    413 CPM Spokane, WA

    http://www2.epa.gov/radnet

    As with the death of the Pacific Ocean, none of it gets reported in the Stepford Wives land that we now inhabit.

    When the initial plumes came over in the early weeks of Fukushima, both the Canadian and American governments turned off their radiation monitors.

    Japan and a large part of North America have been, and continue to be fried, but hey folks, just carry on shopping…

  • lysias

    Speaking of attacks on freedom of the press, The Guardian has this: Sony should not be able to tell journalists what to print:

    Sony, which spent weeks holding itself out as a free speech martyr after North Korea allegedly hacked its emails, is now trying to do more damage to the spirit of the First Amendment than North Korea ever did. The corporation is using high-powered lawyers and lobbyists in an attempt to stifle the rights of media organizations to publish newsworthy information already in the public domain. Ironically, some of those emails include Sony and the MPAA’s attempts to censor the Internet on a much larger scale.

    Sony’s lawyer, David Boies, has spent the week sending out a hyperbolic letter to various news organizations, pressuring them to avert their eyes from the hacked email trove that WikiLeaks published on its site last week. Boies, while misleadingly claiming that journalists could be breaking US law by even looking at the emails, also said if media organizations refused to write stories about them, they would somehow be “protecting the First Amendment.”

    The head of the MPAA and former Democratic Senator Chis Dodd went a step further yesterday, outrageously suggesting the US government should go after WikiLeaks in some fashion for re-publishing the emails.

  • fedup

    I have seen clips on you tube numerous times and it doesn’t prove any demolition took place. In fact, I’ve seen clips from different positions and angles that prove without doubt that it WASN’T a demolition. I also saw with my own eyes planes which struck the WTC.

    Fifty stories of building collapses with no one crashing so much as a bicycle to it. Evidently WTC7 fell apart in sympathy with the other two towers, and just crumbled away into dust in despair!!!

    Fed Up, prove your conspiracy theory.

    How can anyone disprove the most in depth scientific and have a feeling in me water evidence forwarded;

    So I didn’t really see planes flying into the WTC after all?
    THanks for clearing that one up.

1 8 9 10 11 12 20

Comments are closed.