One simple fact cannot be hidden. The firefighters did not cause the fire. Phase 1 of Judge Sir Martin Moore-Bick’s report of the public inquiry into the Grenfell disaster has been released to relatives prior to publication tomorrow. According to the Guardian, it concentrates blame on the firefighters in charge of tackling the blaze. This is an entirely predictable Establishment ploy; blame the little people.
I do not doubt mistakes were made by the firefighters; there will always be well-intentioned errors by those trying to cope with such a terrible crisis. Moore-Bick may be correct in his identification of them. Adherence to the established “stay in your flat” doctrine was disastrously wrong in these circumstances. But the firefighters were not the reason the fire started and spread so quickly. The primary reason was inadequate regulation of the burgeoning fashion for cladding old buildings, and inadequate enforcement of such regulation as was in place.
Moore-Bick may, a couple of years from now, ultimately produce a most damning report of government failings that caused the Grenfell Disaster. But these issues will only be dealt with as Phase 2 of the report, by which time public emotion and recollection will have faded further. I question the methodology of producing an initial report on the events of the night, and a second on the “historical background”, when the “historical background” actually contains the fundamental causes of the tragedy. The second report, when it eventually arrives, will have far less media coverage. The abiding message in the eyes of the duped public will be that the fault lay with the fire brigade.
So let us recall now what really happened.
Deregulation is fundamental to Tory ideology. Speaking specifically on multi-occupation buildings, Fire Minister Bob Neill stated on 16 June 2011:
Over the years, regulations – and the inspections and bureaucracy that go
with them – have piled up and up. This has hurt business, imposing real
burdens and doing real damage to our economy. Reducing the number
of rules and regulations is therefore absolutely central to the Coalition
Government’s vision for Britain, removing barriers to economic growth and
increasing individual freedoms. We have given a clear commitment that where
regulation cannot be justified, we will remove it.
That is one of many examples of vital context given in an excellent pamphlet by the Fire Brigades Union. It is the background to the government’s continued failure over years to address the need for new regulation of developments in cladding.
After six people died due to combustible cladding in the Lakamal House fire of 2009, Tory Minister Eric Pickles’ instinct was to use this disaster to reduce regulation; “My department is committed to a programme of simplification of building regulations”. In the seven years between that statement and the Grenfell fire, the coalition government had still done precisely nothing on cladding regulation.
Meantime, Boris Johnson as Mayor of London was taking an axe to the London Fire Service, closing twelve fire stations. Firemen involved in regulation and inspection were particularly cut. Johnson effectively reduced the number of firemen involved in operational regulation enforcement by half. Total fire brigade staff were reduced by a quarter.
This is the essential background to any criticism of the operational performance of the fire brigade.
Finally, the owners of the building, Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council – arguably the UK’s wealthiest council – bear ultimate responsibility for repeated failures to address fire safety concerns and for putting flammable cladding on the building in order to improve its appearance for the benefit of wealthy neighbours in the surrounding streets. A council planning document made plain that it was clad for the neighbours’ benefit, not that of the residents, “to accord with the development plan by ensuring that the character and appearance of the area are preserved and living conditions of those living near the development suitably protected”. The aim of the cladding was to disguise the existence of accommodation perceived as for poor people.
I have not previously blogged much about Grenfell because I have a distaste for disaster journalism. But if public perception grows that the disaster was the fault of the firefighters, that would be an outrage.
——————————————
Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.
Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.
Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:
IF YOU LIVE IN THE UK, PLEASE SIGN MY PETITION FOR OFFICIAL INTERNATIONAL OSCE OBSERVERS FOR THE NEXT SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM
A major feature of Grenfell politics as it is currently being played out during this election campaign is too hot for this blog to handle.
N_
Indeed , or as Lord Torf ERG smugfeatures might put it ” People like me are not stupid enough to live in places like that, where the stupid council has filled the entire building with inflammable pizza cheese.”
” Please shift the blame orf of political parties like the Tories and on to lesser political levels than me.”
People forget that the private school is a place where massively rich fee paying children can abuse less massively rich fee paying children for free.. it’s always useful to have a butler to bugger when one’s wife is tied up on official juties
@Giyane – Yes indeed, private schools in general and private boarding schools in particular are absolutely crucial to what makes Britain so especially stinky. They are central to the British caste system. Someone like Rees-Mogg has throughout all of his life seen the country and most of its population through walls that are many centuries old and nine feet thick. I am dearly hoping that the Labour Party promises in its manifesto to abolish private schools (boarding or otherwise) and I’m looking forward to sending in my party membership application the same day (16 November?) if they do. It will be the best thing in a Labour manifesto for about 40 years.
According to the Malthusian mind, that the poor should die in big fires like Grenfell is simply the way of nature.
That’s why Tory snobs say things like “the southeast is overcrowded” too. Andrew Bridgen who isn’t himself posh expressed the same mentality when he said that had Jacob Rees-Mogg been in the building he would have been clever enough to escape. Imagine saying something like that! It’s so disgusting that many decent leftwing people don’t hear it properly or they can’t quite get their heads around it. Clever? Who said Rees-Mogg was “clever”? The guy was born to money, both in terms of lolly to his name and “social” influence, what with his pater being editor of the Times. Have you got to be “clever” to have a rich father? But that’s close to what these posh Tory loonies think who lie to themselves as well as to the rest of us. If being rich came from being clever, there would be need for what the Tory mindset worships as the holy of holies: inherited wealth. There’d be no need for segregating their brats off either, although they’d probably do that anyway, or at least they’d send them to boarding school because hating humanity includes thinking the presence of even their own children is an nuisance.
Then there is the racist and Islamophobic view of Grenfell harboured by much of the white population outside of London, which this blog finds an even hotter potato. Sadly the left doesn’t understand racism because it doesn’t get out enough.