Intellectual curiosity can takes us in unexpected directions. This particular journey started with my learning that the word “Cajun” is a contraction of “Canadian”.
Nine years after Culloden, 300 British troops under Lt Col John Winslow entered the town of Grand Pre in Acadia, Nova Scotia. They constructed a palisade fort which enclosed both the church and cemetery. They then summoned all males aged ten and over to the church to hear a proclamation. Disarmed and surrounded, the Acadians were all registered, then told they were to be deported immediately.
Here is that register. Remember many of these were children as young as ten years old. About a quarter did not survive the brutal deportation.
Pierre ALIN
Jean APIGNE
Oliver AUCOIN
Claud AUCOIN
Charles AUCOIN
Jean AUCOIN
Renez AUCOIN
Joseph AUCOIN
Alexandre AUCOIN
Jean Batiste AUCOIN
Charles AUCOIN
Pierre AUCOIN
Simon AUCOIN
Abraham AUCOIN
Simon AUCOIN
Charles AUCOIN
Martin AUCOIN
Oliver AUCOIN
Jean a Pierre AUCOIN
Charles AUCOIN
Aman BABIN
Battiste BABIN
Charles BABIN
Feler BABIN
Jean BABIN
Joseph BABIN
Joseph BABIN
Joseph BABIN
Joseph BABIN
Paul BABIN
Pierre BABIN
Rener BABIN
Simon BABIN
Simon BABIN
Johanes BABBIN
Jacques BELMERE
Joseph BELMERE
Renez BELMERE
Oliver BELFONTAINE
Oliver BELFONTAINE
Francois BENOIST
Joseph BENOIST
Joseph BLANCHARD
Pierre Ilasis BLANA
Pierre BOBIN
Joseph BOUDRO sits
Joseph BOUDRO
Pierre BOUDRO
Michel BOUDRO
Michel BOUDRO Jr.
Ettime BOUDRO
Charles BOUDRO
Marin BOUDRO
Paul BOUDRO
Abraham BOUDRO
Jean BOUDRO
Jesepah BOUDRO
Pierre BOUDRO
Joseph BOUDRO
Norez Michel BOUDRO
Benois BOURG
Francis BOURG
Michel BOURG
“Old” Rener BOURG
Joseph BRASSIN
Cherussin BRAUX
Commo BRASSEAUX
Charles BRAUX
Pierre BRAUX
Vicar Francis BRAUX
Paul BRUN
Joseph BRUN
Pierre BRUN
Aman BRUN
Joseph BRUN
Paul CAPIERE
Pierrs CARETTER
Antoine CELESTIN
Joseph CELESTAIN
Norez CELESTINE
Paul CELESTINE
Charles HEBERT
Etimme LANDRY
Renez LANDRY
Simon LEBLANC
Etair LANDRY
Jean LANDRY fils
Paul LEBLANC
Simon LANDRY
Paul LANDRY
Jean LEBLANC
Jean LANDRY
Jos. LANDRY
Francois LEBLANC
Michelle LANDRY
Jean Pos LEBLANC
Francois LEBLANC
Michelle LANDRY
Bernard LEBLANC
Jean DOUCET
Martin LANDRY
Jacques LEBLANC
Jean DOULET
Jean LANDRY
Pieurs LEBLANC
Antaine HEBERT
Germain LANDRY
Jean Pauque LEBLANC
Igneiff HEBERT Rener LANDRY
Oliver LEBLANC
Simon Pierre HEBERT
Charles LANDRY
Allin LEBLANC
Jean Battiste HEBERT
Rener LANDRY
Joseph LEBLANC
Paul HEBERT
Pierrs LANDRY
Felix LAURENT
Francois HEBERT
Le Petis Clauds LANDRY
Paul LEBAR
Paul HEBERT
Etim LANDRY
Jean LEBARE
Pierre HEBERT
Pierre LEBLANC
Norez LEBARE
Francois HEBERT
Pierre LEBLANC
Margaret LAPIERRE
Alexandre HEBERT
Jean Battiste LEBLANC
Delene LEURON
Aman HEBERT
Benois LEBLANC
Jean LEPRINCE
Jos. HEBERT
Charle LEBLANC
Joseph LEBOUS
Bonnos HEBERT
Jacques LEBLANC
Brounos LE GRANGER
Guilljaums HEBERT
Simon LEBLANC
Pierre LE CLANE
Benonis HEBERT
Pierre LEBLANC
Pierre LEBLANC
Joseph HEBERT
Joseph LEBLANC
Pierre Jean LEBLANC
Simon HEBERT
Oliver LEBLANC
Norez LEBLANC
Alexis HEBERT
Charle LEBLANC
Jean Baptiste LEBLANC
Charle HEBERT
Joseph LEBLANC
Michelle LEBLANC
Charle JEANSONNE
Oliver LEBLANC
Pierre LEBLANC
Alexandre LANDRY
Joseph LEBLANC
Charle LABLUN
Pierre LANDRY
Jean Charle LEBLANC
Pinions LEBLANC
Jean a Pierre LANDRY
Michelle LEBLANC
Auguste LEBLANC
Charles LANDRY
Blesse LEBLANC
Baptiste LEBLANC
Antoine LANDRY
Simon LEBLANC
Piere NOALIS
Bonaumturs LEBLANC
Antoine PITREE
Pierrs a GOUITIN
Jean LEBLANC
Dominque PITRE
Aman LANDRY
Francois LEBLANC
Simon PITRE
Jean LANDRY
Battistes LEBLANC
Simon PITRE
Former LANDRY
Daniell LEBLANC
Bour QUETTE
Francois LANDRY
Alin LEBLANC
Michelle QUETTE
Jos. LANDRY
Joseph LEBLANC
Basil RICHARD
Charle LANDRY
Simon LEBLANC
Renez RICHARD
Pierre LANDRY
Jeanmer LANDRY
Germain RICHARD
Jose LANDRY
Alexis LANDRY
Joseph RICHARD
Charle LANDRY
Charle LANDRY
Joseph RICHARD
Germain LANDRY
Germain LANDRY
Jean RICHARD
Battiste LANDRY
Jean LANDRY
Jean RICHARD Joseph BABIN
George CLOATRE
Jean DUPUIS
Simon BABIN
Pierre GRANGER
Antoine DUPUIS
Jos. BABIN
Jean Battis GRANGER
Francois DUPUIS
Rener BABIN
Jean GRANGER
Jean DUPUIS
Feler BABIN
Sorans GRANGER
Alexandre DUPUIS
Charles BABIN
Simon GRANGER
Michelle DUPUIS
Joseph BABIN
Charles GRANGER
Suprian DUPUIS
Jean Robs CHOC
Joseph GRANGER
Charle DUPUIS
Clotis ——-
Rener GRANGER
Germain DUPUIS
Finmi CHELLE
Charle GRANGER
Antoine DOUCET
Pierre COMMO
Francois GRANGER
Tunuislaps FORREST
“le Vieuc COMMO”
Jean GRANGER
Oliver FORREST
Joseph COMMO
Joseph GRANGER
Josses inferms
Jean Louis BOUDRO
Ansemine GRANGER
habitant in formis
Jean Battiste BOUDRO
Joseph GRANGER
Charles JEAN SONNE
Charle BOUDRO
Francis GRANGER
Joseph GOTRO
Pierre BOUDRO
Charle GRANGER
Alexxis GOTRO
Claude BOUDRO
Aman GRANGER
Jean GOTRO
Anseleme BOUDRO
Joseph GRANGER
Pierrs GAUTRO
Pierrs BOUDRO
Vestache COMMO
Paul GOTRO
Paul BOUDRO
Jean Battiste COMMO
Charle GOTRO
Joseph BOUDRO
Esteeme COMMO
Jean GOTRO
Pierrs BOUDRO
Alexis COMMO
Joseph GOTRO
Paul BOUDRO
Oliver COMMO
Paul GOTRO
Joseph BOUDRO
Pierre COMMO
Alexis GOTRO
Pierrs BOUDRO
Simon COMMO
Aman GOTRO
Paul BOUDRO
Norez COMMO
Joseph HEBERT
Joseph BOUDRO
Bassil COMMO
Aman GRANGER
Pierrs BOUDRO
Dominque COTE
Pierre HEBERT
Paul BOUDRO
Jean Beautiste DAIGREE
Joseph HEBERT
Joseph BOUDRO
Jean Baxirles DAIGREE
Manuel HEBERT
Alexandre DUON
Charle DAIGREE
Pierre HEBERT
Joseph DUPUIS
Norez DAIGRE
Oliver HEBERT
Fabien DUPUIS
Oliver DAIGRE fils
Jean HEBERT
Silven DUPUIS
Oliver DAIGRE
Joseph HEBERT
Simon DUPUIS
Brener DAIGRE
Norez HEBERT
Germain DUPUIS Joseph DAIGRE
Etimme HEBERT
Jean Batiste DUPUIS
Astaches DAIGRE
Pierre HEBERT
Aman DUPUIS
Battistes DAIGRE
Augustin HEBERT
Charle CELESTINE
Alin DAIGRE
Renez HEBERT
Pierre CELESTINE
Charles DAIGRE
Aman HEBERT
Jacques CELEVE
Pierrs DAIGRE
Jacques HEBERT
Jacques CLELAND
Norez DAIGRE
Oliver HEBERT
Pierre CLEMENSON
Jean Battiste DAVID
Augustin HEBERT
Lewis Pierre CLOATRE
Joseph BOULET
Joseph HEBERT
George CLOATRE
Pierre BOULET
Joseph HEBERT
Jaque RICHARD
Joseph LEBLANC du
Sour
Maturin LEBLANC
Pierrs LEBLANC
Charles LEBLANC Cems
Paul LEBLANC
Jean Pierrs LEBLANC
Germain TERRIOT
Oliver TERRIOT
Pierre TERRIOTE
Jean TERRIOT
Charles TERIOT
Jacwue TERIOT
Brunois TERRIOTE
Charls TIBODO
Joseph TIBODO
Paul TIBODO
Germain TIBODO
Joseph TRAHANE
Pierre TRAHAN
Claude TRAHAN
Michelle TRAHAN
Charle TRAHAN
Pierre TRAHAN
Jean TRAHAN
Renez TRAHAN
Francis ROUS
Charles ROBICHOCT
Jean Le SOUR
Francis ROUS
Antoine MAJET
Baptiste SAPIN
Jeanm Batptiste MASIER
James SAPIN
Battis MASSIER
Joseph SEMER
Amans MASSIER
Charle SONIER
Battistes MASSIER
Pierre SOSONIER
Paul MELANSON
Renez SOSONIER
Baptistes MELANSON
Marcelle SONER
Pierre Jane MELANSON
Pierre TERRIOT
Battistes MELANSON
Janis TERRIOT
Jean Battis MELANSON
Charle a Claude TERRIOT
Joseph MELANSON
Pierre MELANSON
Suprien TERRIOT
James MELANSON
Charle TERRIOT
Pierre Jean MELANSON
Pierre TRAHAN
Aman MELANSON
Joseph TRAHAN
Pierre MELANSON
Joseph TRAHAN
Jacques MELANSON
Jean TRAHAN
Joseph MUNIER
Charles TRAHAN
Anselmer ales MANGEAN
Jean Batistes TRAHAN
Pierre RICHARD
Pierre TRAHAN
Jos. RICHARD
Joseph TRAHAN
Charles RICHARD
Charle TUNOUR
Paul RICHARD
Joseph VINCENT
Paul RICHARD
Antoine VINCENT
Joseph ROBICHAUD
In the next year 40% of the 15,000 population of Acadia were forcefully deported, deliberately dispersed to British colonies around the globe, in such dreadful conditions that over 1,200 died on the journeys. Males over ten, and females and small children, were bundled into separated random groups and those groups sent off to different destinations.
In Grand Pre itself, the British troops burnt down the church and destroyed the homes, and then smashed the system of dykes and sluices that the Acadians had built for their highly productive agricultural system.
Almost all of the remaining Acadians were dispersed over the next few years. Traveling through the wilds, some who left “voluntarily” eventually found their way to Louisiana. Hence “Cajun”. In 1758 it was made illegal in Nova Scotia for Catholics to own land. In 1759 a further Act was passed:
“An Act for the Quieting of Possessions to the Protestant Grantees of the Lands, formerly occupied by the French Inhabitants, and for preventing vexatious Actions relating to the same.” The legislation prohibited “any troublesome or vexatious Suits of Law” by Acadians trying to recover their lands and made it illegal for any courts in the province to hear cases brought “for the Recovery of any Lands” by “the former French Inhabitants.”
The preamble to Act recounted the “Manifest Treasons and Rebellions” of the Acadians against a British crown to which they had never in truth had the slightest duty of allegiance.
The Acadians had arrived in modern Nova Scotia from 1608. There were three unusual things about them.
i) From the start they had been focused on land reclamation in the coastal marshlands, rather than moving inland cutting down forests for agricultural land as was the prevalent pattern across North America. Historians have calculated they reclaimed in total 5,261 hectares of land. Their achievements in land reclamation were quite startling, especially as in the Grand Pre marsh they were dealing with tidal flows in the Bay of Fundy of over 15 metres, said to be the world’s highest.
Modern scholarship has emphasised that their land reclamation skills were brought with then from the Western French seaboard, and then developed in a local vernacular. The unique feature of Acadian land reclamation, as opposed to French or Dutch, is that it was a communal effort and not dependent on central finance and hierarchical organisation. That is because of their second special feature:
ii) The Acadians arrived as individuals or families with no hierarchy. They acknowledged no nobility and crucially they did not acknowledge any Crown. Occasionally they were obliged temporarily to pay lip service to the French or British crown when military forces passed through, but until their deportation they were never successfully subjected to any central authority.
iii) They enjoyed consistently friendly relationships with the local Mik’maq nation and intermarried without apparent prejudice on either side, developing a large Creole component. Historians have generally explained this as due to Acadian agriculture being on reclaimed land and thus not competing for resources. However that ignores the fact the salt marshes they were reclaiming were themselves a very valuable source of food for the Mik’maq – birds and eggs, fish shellfish and crustaceans, samphire etc.
I rather tend to the view that it was the lack of hierarchy and crown allegiance that also led to good relationships with the native people. The Acadians made no claim to conquer the land, impose a new king or create a state. They were just settling non-aggressive farming communities.
Historians are at pains to counter the idyllic portrait of the Acadians. We are told they were very poor, lived in squalid conditions, tended to inbreed, left no cultural legacy and were often led by their Catholic priests. There is validity in all those points, but in the historical context such criticisms cannot help but come over badly. The imperfections of a society do not justify genocide.
In reading about the Acadians, I was struck by this passage:
“When the first New England colonists came to Nova Scotia five years after the Acadians were expelled, they encountered a landscape littered with bleached bones of livestock and burned ruins of houses.”
Anyone who has hill walked in the Highlands of Scotland knows just how frequently you come across the low walls of the base of old homes, often grouped together in small settlements, and sometimes in desolate moor many miles from the nearest habitation or cultivated land. These of course date from the Highland Clearances, some contemporary with the genocide of the Acadians.
One obvious fact had leapt out at me since childhood. The depopulation of the Highlands was a political choice, and the vast managed hunting estates were perfectly capable of supporting large populations through livestock and arable in the past. The notion they can only sustain grouse and small numbers of deer is evidently nonsense.
I am currently researching a biography of the Jacobite General George Murray, and was looking at a journey he took from Blair Atholl to Braemar. There is absolutely no public road there any more – not within twenty miles of most of his route – and the places he stayed including manses seem to be wiped from the map. There was a population – indeed he later raised troops there.
Go to google maps, trace a straight line Blair Atholl to Braemar (yes, obviously you can get there the long way round) and see what you can find today in the middle. But this is not wilderness, it is completely habitable and was populated.
I could recount a thousand or more atrocities across the history of the British Empire as bad as the Acadian genocide. Many are completely forgotten, like the massacre of the Murree tribe in Balochistan under a flag of truce, or the Sierra Leone Hut Tax war. Some are startlingly recent, like the Chagos Islands. But I recount the Acadian story because of its resonance to the Scottish Highlands, with that justification of treason and rebellion, and because of the furious denial in recent days after Scottish colonisation was asserted in the House of Commons.
The tone of much of that reaction is essentially that white people were not the victims of Empire. Well, I give you the Acadians. It is also worth pointing out the very basic fact that there was never the kind of expulsion and depopulation anywhere in England that occurred in both Scotland and Ireland. What happened to the Gael was much worse than effects of agricultural enclosure.
It is Armistice Day today and Remembrance Sunday shortly. What was in my childhood an occasion for reflection, grief and thanksgiving for peace has been turned into an orgy of militarism.
We are supposed to think of those who “gloriously” gave their lives for Britain, perhaps while shooting up Afghan civilians in a village or destroying the infrastructure of Iraq. Have a look through that list of names from the town of Grand Pre, and wonder which ones were ten year old boys separated from their mothers. Ponder which died on their hideous deportation journeys. The victims of Empire deserve remembrance too.
————————————————-
Forgive me for pointing out that my ability to provide this coverage is entirely dependent on your kind voluntary subscriptions which keep this blog going. This post is free for anybody to reproduce or republish, including in translation. You are still very welcome to read without subscribing.
Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.
Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.
Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:
Paypal address for one-off donations: [email protected]
Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:
Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address Natwest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB
Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a
Subscriptions are still preferred to donations as I can’t run the blog without some certainty of future income, but I understand why some people prefer not to commit to that.
Thank you for this, Mr. Murray. I call your brief report essential reading for any North American who needs to understand that the British Empire was not at all benign, and the present British, or English, establishment is not our friend.
A few maps to the extent of the British army bases/forts post 1746, and the coming Clearances.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FguP-chWYAAD_9n?format=jpg&name=medium
https://sites.google.com/site/stennishs/
Thankyou for that fascinating link, RoS.
What is most noticeable is that almost all of the soldiers mentioned in the texts were Scottish.
Also, Courts Martial in those days were a bit arbitrary in their administration of Justice. Here’s a paste of one the transcripts of one of those judgements:
>>>>
I do approve of the Sentence of this Court Martial in part, that is to say, as John McFarland and William Thomson Seem Equally Guilty, I order him of the two to be Shot Dead upon the [illegible] Inst, who shall throw the lowest Die;
The Commanding Officer to be present and see the Strictest Justice done on this occasion
Given at Edinburgh this 3d day of August 1751
(Sign’d) George Churchill
By the General’s Command
Ja Stewart Aid deCampe
<<<<
Don't you just love how Justice is administered here in Scotland? Two guys are equally guilty, so let's flip a coin to see which one will be shot.
It puts me in mind of a much more recent case of a juryless trial where two Libyan blokes were indicted on a charge of having "conspired with eachother to cause the explosion which destroyed PanAm 103" over Lockerbie.
Fhimah was found Not Guilty of conspiring with Megrahi. Megrahi was found Guilty of conspiring with Fhimah. Duh!
As has been so painfully displayed in the cases of Alex Salmond and Craig Murray, only a jury trial can find Justice in a criminal case. Never leave that stuff to Judges.
I was Just Threatend By the US ? Uk they mentioned my Grandaughters Name..I Feell Sick Bastards
A fascinating insight into the journey of the Cajun/Creole to Florida. I was aware of them initially being from Canada, but not the details so thank you for that! Amazing religious persecution between Catholic and Protestant is a constant feature of those times an indeed for several hundred years in Europe and its colonies. Part of the reason I am a humanist.
I’d never heard of the Acadians or what was done to them. Was curious to see the name does relate to the poetic idea of unspoilt Arcadia in Greece, via the Italian explorer (Wikipedia says maybe it was from a Mik’maq word, citing a deadlink to a Canadian museum of Acadia FAQ which gives no source itself. From elsewhere it seems there’s documentary proof now in a New York museum that it was from Arcadia).
Was surprised to find out recently from a Pilger documentary The Coming War that the sexy bikini was named after the testing of nuclear bombs on islands by the US military and they moved the locals back too soon in order to keep researching how they developed cancers etc.
Meanwhile ‘Lord’ David Frost calls eco wind power medieval and wants more deregulation even as companies surround our own island with our own excrement?
I greatly look forward to buying and reading Craig Murray’s forthcoming book on his illustrious forebear.
I know that it will be the best researched and most expressively written one so far on the subject. I have a signed copy of his one on Burnes and I expect no less quality in the forthcoming one on the Atholl Murray guy.
G Murray was an ardent exponent of Scottish domination of the UK which was created by his generation with great, and sometimes failed, effort. Looting plunder, from the English worked for him, for a while. Eventually, not so much.
Derby was pretty much his outer limit, though Culloden had a bit more finality.
That Murray claimed his motivation was not Scottish nationalism but ‘that the prestige of Great Britain should be upheld among the nations of the world’. That was his desire. A Scottish Union of the United Kingdom under force of arms.
That Murray guy was no separatist. Quite the opposite.
Kenneth White was in Montréal trying to get to Labrador but couldn’t find a map of Labrador anywhere. (Actually I think the French lost Labrador to the English in bygone times). He has this exchange with someone in a café:
______
Je suis en train de manger une soupe à l’oignon dans un bistrot de la rue Sant-Denis, en compagnie d’un écrivain québécois, quand je lui pose, de but en blanc, la question à mille francs :
« Comment se fait-il que le Labrador ne soit pas une réalité à Montréal? »
[…] Pour lui, les Québécois sont tous les paysans de Poitou qui n’ont pas encore pris conscience de leur arrivée sur le continent américain. Ils sont culturellement traumatisés et.. ils passent leur temps à se souvenir :
« Je me souviens», dit la devise du Québec.
J’ai demandé à quelqu’un de quels souvenirs il s’agissait:
« Du débarquement des Anglais. »
Grand D***! Qui se soucie encore des Anglais?
Si je me préoccupais de ce qu’ils ont fait, les Anglais, je serais toujours là-haut, dans la Vieille Calédonie, à soigner mes griefs et à écrire de longs poèmes politiques dans la langue de mes ancêtres.
Et merde! On ne peut pas rester écossais toute sa vie. Il faut savoir sortir de son trou, se mêler au monde.
(Kenneth White, LA ROUTE BLEUE, Grasset, Le Livre de Poche, 1983, td 15)
A few quotes from ‘Seanchaidh na Coille/ Memory-Keeper of the Forest: Anthology of Scottish Gaelic Literature of Canada’, Edited by Michael Newton, Cape Breton University Press, Sydney, Nova Scotia, 2015 —
“Many historians of the Clearances simply treat these events as the inevitable calculus of economics and the irrepressible march of modernity. The resistance of some scholars to take these Gaelic perspectives seriously could be interpreted as an attempt to maintain the authority of an Anglocentric master narrative that asserts that the British Empire was an unstoppable force for civilization, progress, and enlightenment. […] If Gaelic perspectives were taken seriously, they might highlight the injustices perpetrated in the past that have created one of the most concentrated and unjust landholding patterns in the world, one in which native Highlanders are still disenfranchised. They might suggest that reparations are in order.”
“The British Empire’s ability to expand the territories under its control from 1756 to 1815 owed much to the fact that it spent from 75 per cent to 85 per cent of its budget on military enterprises. Landowners sought to tap these vast financial resources and enhance their own social rank by selling their Highland tenantry as natural-born soldiers who could be recruited in large numbers by leveraging their hereditary clan relationships. Highlanders of many social ranks seemed to believe that they could gain favour with the London government and dispel any lingering suspicions of Jacobite sympathies by a conspicuous demonstration of their loyalty in military service. Thus, the economic-political interests of the land-owning elite and the military ambitions of the empire conspired in the Highlands’ specialization in military recruitment, a specialization justified by recourse to obsolete and ethnocentric myths about supposed Gaelic ‘savagery’. In 1756 the young chieftain Simon Fraser of Lovat—son of an executed Jacobite ‘rebel’—successfully petitioned to raise a regiment to fight against French forces in North America and within two months about 2,000 Highlanders were mobilized for action. Some 12,000 Highland soldiers in total were involved by the end of the Seven Years’ War in other regiments as well. Gaels perceived themselves to have proved their mettle and their loyalties prominently by their efforts, not least on the Plains of Abraham. […] Soldiers and sailors who had fought in the North American theatre of the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) were eligible for land grants in British North America as rewards for their military service.”
Leading on from the foregoing, the central punch of the book for me is the highlighting and analysis of the agonizingly fragmented (lethally “skewered”?) identity of those brutally cleared from Scotland who then found themselves enlisted as British troops:
“Some Gaels consciously or unconsciously blotted these debasing episodes of eviction and the associated shame from communal memory, even if they were left with emotional scars and cultural traumas that were difficult to resolve. Some made an effort, especially through oral tradition, to create a heroic emigration narrative that could turn the experience of defeat and dispossession into a triumph of self-determination and success. Many others, however, were left with an inferiority complex that not only encouraged them to seek the external validation of the anglophone world but to ultimately assimilate to its norms as thoroughly as possible in order to gain its status and privilege.”
(‘SEANCHAIDH NA COILLE/ MEMORY-KEEPER OF THE FOREST: Anthology of Scottish Gaelic Literature of Canada’, Edited by Michael Newton, Cape Breton University Press, Sydney, Nova Scotia, 2015.)
As an American with Scottish ancestry this article resonates highly with me. Thank you and keep up the good work!
I used to go sailing from Medemblik each summer. I only discovered after I stopped going that Lord George Murray was buried in the grave yard next to the harbour!
Thank you Craig for shining a light into my understanding of the Cajun Creole culture and their history under ruthless colonialism. It also explains the English attitude towards the French today. One wonders what the French at that time had to say about the genocide of its settlers and the dispersal of the few people left throughout the Americas.
But their self reliance and culture has not been totally disappeared as the Cajun music, their food and their penchant for marshes and swamps to live next to, is still alive.
Play these songs and enjoy while you read the article again; it rounds up this historic nugget from Craig:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07jF_EVink4
LEST WE FORGET
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/03/video-british-troops-firing-jeremy-corbyn-poster
An archeological take on Acadia and the Winslow declaration. Could the palisade in Scotland be the SNP?
https://www.archaeology.org/issues/458-2203/features/10333-acadia-paradise-lost#art_page2
And so they go to their churches today to celebrate slaughter. To celebrate the deaths of the many who died in the most inhumane way a living person could die.
I’m the splendour of their Sunday best and or military uniform they turn the churches into brothels of celebration to the slaughtered.
Yes our God must revel in the presence of the gore of broken and dismembered pieces of meat that once were sons and daughters.
Not all Canadians, just those of Acadia = Cajun
Maybe like this (Braemar to Blair Atholl) there’s a zoom map down the page.
https://www.walkhighlands.co.uk/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=43744
Yes, when you drive and / or walk a lot in Scotland you see some curious sites like old bridges that go nowhere, and even Inns and Hotels in curious places (off the main road). Some of it is down to the Victorian obsession with Scotland and Queen Victoria, some of it though would bear some research. Some roads entering estates are relatively new, some ancient. Never to be seen again! They shoot peasants even out of season.
I probably have distant relations in Nova Scotia, another lifetime to check that out.
Craig, good morning, hello and welcome.
Some would tell you both broad random and specific knowledge of the past, and of campaigns of actions taken in those pasts to shape the future for a contrived novel virtualised reality in a command controlled present, as per the Acadian example, allows for the copying and further development of its modus operandi to present in the future of a postmodern age/place/space, similar campaigning activity for command and control of contrived novel virtualised realities, albeit by completely different secretive and much stealthier and considerably more sophisticated means and memes.
You might like to consider such is a current present virtual reality program for mass main stream media manipulation in relatively fabulous fabless command of remote absolute control of human perception and elite exclusive executive administrative governance systems.
And influencing and exerting any sort of effective positive leverage to steer that future in any greater direction to any better destination and starting point does necessarily vitally require that one knows what/whom to talk to/make contact with and be fully prepared to wholeheartedly share one’s desires …… which takes one to a whole new level of unusual expertise and peculiarly particular expert tease which here, and in the earlier submissions copied below, be only briefly revealed and lightly touched upon.
Dear Craig, You are worth reading even just for these gems.
‘”Cajun” is a contraction of “Canadian”.’
Nope, it’s a contraction of “Acadian”.
Another story where the British involvement was not honest.
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2022-11-10/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/the-british-kindled-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict-they-are-to-blame/00000184-60fc-dab5-a58e-fffcbf290000
Sadly you need a sub to read the whole thing.
Fascinating. Thanks again, Craig.
Grim stuff, indeed. But for goodness sake, this was the 1750’s. Undoubtedly a grim time for the vast majority of the world’s population, compared to our own existence. Especially for those trying to build new lives in new colonies, whether out of bravery, idealism, or perhaps just desperation and lack of choice. You can find life expectancy stats from the time and place from about 30 years down to below 25. Life was certainly cheap and very expendable, horrendously so for children.
What concerns me when I read this kind of stuff is then the delicacy of the life and values that we now enjoy, and the responsibility as far as we can to leave things in a fit state for our children and children’s children. Surely a process that goes one way in 200 years could just as easily go the other, perhaps even quicker.
So is the best way to secure our future by radical, anti-establishment policies, or by status quo conservatism? To correct Ronaldo’s recent Picasso quote “Every act of creation is first an act of destruction”. Right, but let’s not risk going back to the 1750’s in the process. As Craig has just reminded us, it wasn’t a pretty place.
Correct. The Expulsion of the Acadians is a well known aspect of Canadian History and must be understood in the context of the almost continuous state of war between the British and French on both sides of the Atlantic at the time.
After the final defeat of the French at Quebec City in 1759, the treaties of Hubertusburg and Paris (February 1763) were signed. Obviously, Acadia (then renamed the province of Nova Scotia aka New Scotland *cough*) was of great strategic importance to the British, having a large maritime border close to England with decent protected harbours. No effort was made to expel the French settlers from Upper Canada (later Quebec).
The entrance to the Bay of Fundy was particularly important hence the forced expulsion of the French there, and the renaming of the Town to Wolfville, after the British General who defeated the French and died in the process. Acadia University is located there since 1841.
This song (by a Cajun descendant) and the numerous slides it contains is of more value than what Craig has written. At the end there are charts indicating the directions of Acadian emigration, not all of which were forced. As the song indicates many later returned.
https://youtu.be/te7KW4K-00E
White people not victims of the empire? I give you the Serbians, 1991–1999.
All the etymologies say that Cajun is derived from Acadian, not Canadian. And I’ve known that for decades, and that they were expelled. I’m surprised that Craig didn’t know that, because I find him to more knowledgeable than me in so many subjects.
In fairness to Craig, I learned about the origins of the Cajuns from a wonderful exhibit on non-English cultures of the Americas, at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, DC, one summer. I heard a Cajun from Missouri, not Louisiana, tell a story in his language. There was still a small Cajun community there, left over from the trek down the Mississippi from Acadia.
A quick correction. I gave, as an Acadian sentence, “J’avions monté dans mon char.” No! I was influenced by the standard French version: I should have written, “J’avions embarqué dans mon char.” (“Embarquer”: the Acadians of southwest Nova Scotia have traditionally been ship- and boat-builders, and made their livings from the sea.)
Forgive me, but surely “J’avais” is what you want here? “Nous avions”, certainly, but “j’avions” n’est-ce pas ma compréhension de la grammaire français…
No, “J’avions” is the Acadian form–which as I indicated differs from standard French. In my initial post, which seems to have disappeared, I indicated that one would say in standard French “Je suis monté dans ma voiture.” Acadian, resembling in this some dialects of early modern French, uses a marine verb, “embarquer,” rather than “monter,” uses an old word, “char,” i.e. wagon, rather than “voiture,” conjugates the verb with “avoir” instead of “être,” and employs for the first-person singular a form that in standard modern French is plural. What it adds up to is this: a speaker of standard French could have difficulties understanding a conversation in Acadian; someone brought up on early sixteenth century French would do better….