- This topic has 127 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I have not been following the latest news with my usual attention. The following explains why…it was sent to a relative. The final two pieces of information came from the how bad is my batch site – work on the CDC’s secret expiry dates for the vax, and the electron microscope work of Nagase’s. I know there have been rumours about all this ever since the beginning, but this is proof I am prepared to accept.
The reason I stopped studying the medical information is because it became clear, from some statistical research and from some Dr Daniel Nagase’s electron microscopy of vials of the vax, that these vax batches are truly different from each other. Some are more toxic than others, On electron microscopy (which cannot lie) some have no mRNA in them, (no nitrogen or phosphorous, which is an essential component of mRNA) but appear to have a lot of carbon and oxygen, which raises the graphene question again.
There was a leak of the CDC’s secret expiry dates and these expiry dates only applied to about 25 batches from each manufacturer (not all batches) These 25 proved to match perfectly with the most toxic batches that caused the greatest number of deaths and injuries. So the expiry dates are on the biologically active batches, the others are placebos but may contain graphene, which accounts for the relatively inert placebos not needing a carefully recorded expiry date.
(howbadismybatchwebsite)The vaccine safety trial data that a US judge ordered Pfizer to release a few months ago (Pfizer wanted to keep this data secret for 75 years) has shown no evidence of any adequate or proper medical safety trials on these products prior to marketing. There are only repetitive sets of irrelevant paperwork being released and no real vaccine trial data to back up their claims of efficacy.
It looks as if Pfizer did not carry out any safety trials before the vaxes were used (apart from one in Argentina which was clearly fraudulent and a few others that were already known about and in the public domain before this judicial ruling) So no responsible medical trial data …all lies again. This is why they wanted to keep this knowledge on the pre- marketing trials secret.
Pfizer have refused to serialise their “vaccines”! This is stated in the contracts with governments. In addition The Emergency use authorisations, under which these vaccines are being used, allow for very minimal recording of manufacturing ingredients and distribution pathways. This makes it impossible to trace vaccines that have caused harm.Also it is impossible for new vaxes to be manufactured within the very short time claimed (6 months) It takes at least two years to scale up manufacturing from the initial experimental laboratory produced batches, which are used in trials to a mass produced form. (Hedley Reese Inside Pharma substack)
So this proves they had the vaxes already researched, manufactured, and ready to go once they declared the pandemic. There is no way they could have millions of doses of a new vax ready to distribute worldwide otherwise. They are claiming that it only took six months from discovering the virus, to developing a vaccine, safety trialling it, and manufacturing mass supplies in the millions of doses. This is impossible.
God knows what is in them. It is all a mass of lies, one lie on another, so I would be wasting my time to follow it in detail. Now I know all I need to know.
I was never sure what to make of rumours of the batches being placebos but I am convinced by this latest information, so there is not much point in researching the medical side further. This has freed me to turn my attention to other things (after two years of being glued to the lockdownsceptics news)That’d be general practitioner and anti-masker Daniel “tax slavery” Nagase, would it “Kate”? I didn’t know electron microscopy was within a GP’s remit. And I didn’t know it was impossible to misinterpret electron microscope results, in fact I thought it was very easy.
I suppose all the thousands of papers in the scientific literature must be the work of a conspiracy then. And the statistics from all over the world that showed such major reductions in hospital admissions and deaths. Ho hum. And there was me thinking corruption in politics was humanity’s problem. Turns out it’s all the scientists and statisticians except for a handful of right wing heroes.
I’d never heard of Daniel Nagase until this hour. It has taken very little time to discover that he’s a deranged conspiracy theorist. He seems to be opposed to all taxation, believing it to go directly into politicians’ own pockets (and to the Queen of England, apparently; even taxation from Canada) – goodness know what he thinks pays for all the public sector activity that goes on around him, or what pays the wages of public sector employees.
And guess what? He’s an anthropogenic climate change denier. I’m not going to link to the YouTube video of him; find “Freedom Convoy Truth by Dr. Daniel Nagase “Taxation Slavery” – IrnieracingNews Feb.12, 2022″ if you want to see for yourself. He’s either bonkers or lying.
Dr. Nagase, has honours degree in cellular biology and physiology before getting a medical degree. This is entirely probable. An entry into a medical degree is often via another degree and I think is a common thing, especially in Canada.
The sample of Moderna and Pfizer vaccines used in the scanning electron microscope analysis had been rattling around for one to two months in the back of someone’s car at ambient temperatures according to Dr. Nagase himself. That in itself renders any information from it almost useless.
There was another electron microscope “study” done in a Spanish university, one which the said university has disassociated itself from and again the provenance of the sample vaccine in unknown.
As Clark has pointed out, you can’t on the one hand argue that these vaccines are gene-altering biologics containing contaminating mRNA sequences and on the other that they contain no biologics.
I found a transcript with the SEM pictures and alleged spectroscopic analyses in the form of a .pdf here.
I’m sure your sources are impeccable, Kate, and I for one am fully convinced. However, some of my friends are incredibly cynical and wouldn’t just take this at face value.
Could you provide some of the sources you’ve used for you conclusions above, so I can prove these friends wrong when they express doubts?
No doubt they’ll say things like, “What about flu vaccines? These are produced and manufactured every year in far less than six months.” Like I say – complete cynics and oblivious to the Real Truth.
I am usually on other forums. Forums where the medical data is analysed in more depth. But I realise there is a political component to this situation too. I used to frequent this website about ten years ago in the Skripal days…what happened to them?
The medical information is hard to follow unless you have been keeping up with it regularly, as each piece of the picture falls into place. The best source at the moment for statistical, scientific, and medical background is Substack. I will look for some sites to recommend.
This is the transcript of the Electron microscopy work.
It was not Nagase who carried this out, electron microscopes are not cheap pieces of equipment; it was done at a Canadian University. Canada is in such a state of repression that his collaborators are afraid to reveal their identities.
It is to Nagase’s credit that he is prepared to expose himself.https://expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Transcript-Dr.-Daniel-Nagase.pdf
Sorry for the double entendre there …no edit facility.
I ought to add that the length of time the vaxes were left at room temperature will have no impact on the ability of the EM to find elements if they exist in the samples.This is the howbadismybatch website which has been carrying out research using the VAERS database, which is the main database in the US and provides lot number information together with adverse events. This means that vax lots and toxicity reactions can be correlated.
https://howbadismybatch.com/expiry.html
“The govt makes available to medical practitioners a list of expiry dates for all lots. However the CDC keeps this list a guarded secret from the general public (why would that be, I wonder?). However, a contact passed on this list to me. I noticed that the lots on the expiry list are ALL of the ones with the highest number of adverse reactions reports (ADRs) in each alphabet group. I wondered why that was so? Why were none of the other lots on the expiry list – those with only a handful of adrs? (I had previously surmised that the others could be placebo.”)
Very complete discussion of the regulatory capture and corruption in the vaccine industry.
The entire substack of this doctor is useful. However, I do not agree with him that the vaccine implimentation is due to greed. This is because of the abnormal emphasis on vaccinating pregnant women, which is NEVER done with a new product. There can be no financial gain for the industry in this the numbers are too small.https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-do-we-now-know-about-hot-covid
If you have not seen this interview it is the most informative and reasonable discussion of the “pandemic” from a medical perspective. A descriptive transcript and a shortened video are also on the site.
“Dr Peter McCullough has emerged as medicine’s most reasonable, moral voice. From many videos, I have chosen his best and below fill any lacunae in its stark message: C-19 is treatable; shun vaccines.”https://johnwaters.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccines-renowned-physician
A Moratorium on mRNA ‘Vaccines’ is Needed
Re-Visiting the Biodistribution of Lipid Nanoparticleshttps://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/a-moratorium-on-mrna-vaccines-is
Here’s how the vaccine is causing those weird “blood clots”
I had a nice chat with Jessica Rose today on her Substack article about how the vaccine is causing your blood to perform unnatural acts.https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/heres-how-the-vaccine-is-causing
Compelling analysis from Professor R. Ennos showing how the sequential rollout of vaccines in Scotland resulted in higher mortality as the vaccins reached sucessive age groups.
Seem to be having some problems with posting on this webpage. Anyway I hope I have provided some information to show that these injections are not comparable to normal vaccinations and that the assertions from government that they are trustworthy should not be taken at face value.
Kate, the big difference about the Skripal fiasco and covid is that nearly all the “information” (ie. disinformation) about the Skripals came from the secret services, whereas virology, epidemiology, immunology etc. are sciences, and science is largely a public activity.
And the big problem with these latest vaccine scares is that both the hospital admission rate and the death rate dropped dramatically as vaccination was deployed.
Covid denialism is conspiracy theory, by which I mean that the supposed conspiracy has to be expanded and expanded in the attempt to keep the narrative tenable. I know it has been claimed that covid is almost harmless and that the apparent peaks were an artefact caused by the covid tests supposedly being prone to false positives – so the conspiracy has to expand to include the scientists who devise and defend PCR tests. But the hospital admission rate and death rate from all causes showed peaks coincident with the covid peaks, so the conspiracy would have to expand to include national statistics offices from all over the world. Further, national statistics are compiled from regional statistics and hospital statistics, so those public employees would have to be included in the conspiracy too. Then there are all the doctors, nurses, ambulance crews etc. who complained about the colossal workload that suddenly fell upon them, and so on, until our own friends, families and neighbours become suspects.
Should I suspect that my former girlfriend has been bribed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? During the second UK wave she was working in the kitchen of a care home for the elderly. As the staff got covid symptoms (and the management refused to give them sick leave without positive lateral flow tests) she saw more and more residents succumb to covid. The number of residents fell from about sixty to about forty. Her LFT eventually showed positive and she got time off work. When she got back, the chef had died of it. In all I know of thirty deaths in the two UK waves; two people I knew personally, the rest known personally by people I know. Since vaccination, there have been no short periods of high death rates like those first two waves.
So my personal experience strongly confirms that the injections contain effective vaccines.
Hi Clark,
Thanks for your response. I have not got the energy to revisit all the information from the last two years which has led me to become highly suspicious of the government narrative, but I will make a few points.
First, if you believe that the health authorities have acted in good faith during the pandemic, please listen to the McCullough interview. He is a doctor who researched and developed early treatment for covid sufferers, yet these therapies were blocked and vaccination promoted as the only option.
Sars-Cov-2 is a real virus with particular and unusual attributes, in fact it has inserts that have never been found in any other coronavirus. So yes, your girlfriend would become ill with it.
Statistics. The national statistics were manipulated by nationwide testing of asymptomatic people, which multiplied the false positive rates massively, thus giving the impression of peaks, which were in fact artifacts of the numbers of tests being done. Using the methods they did it is very easy to get high positive test numbers. In fact the ‘all cause’ mortality for the pandemic year was normal. It elevated once the vaccines started to be used in the elderly.
I am afraid I cannot agree with you that death rates dropped once vaccines were implemented. In fact the opposite is true, the death rates shot up.
You might like to look at this report on this topic.It is not nice, coming to the conclusion that our wellbeing is of no concern to those in power.
Kate, please try to read more carefully and think. The sharp peaks were visible in the rate of deaths from all causes, and so had nothing to do with testing.
Testing does not cause people to seek hospital admission. It does not cause doctors to admit otherwise healthy people into very limited intensive care facilities. It does not overwhelm the supply of medical oxygen, nor cause people’s condition to deteriorate when that oxygen runs out, as happened at a hospital near me in Southend.
And a scientific narrative is not a government narrative.
And I wasn’t talking about my former girlfriend’s illness particularly. I was talking of twenty of the sixty residents of the care home she worked at, who all died in the course of four weeks. That can’t be caused by testing either.
I have no illusions about governments; they let hundreds of thousands of people die needlessly by ignoring the advice of the epidemiology community.
https://jdee.substack.com/p/coming-soon
Try this from a former G7 head of a government statistics unit Graphs and statistical analysis on the substack page.
Just out yesterday, following a post by Steve kirsch finding the same effect in the US data.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/this-one-graph-tells-you-everything
Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people’PCR has a very low false positive rate. The “false positive” narrative was spun from its sensitivity because, at its highest sensitivity, it can detect fragments of viruses that the immune system has killed for a few weeks after people have recovered; this is why the WHO and other authorities started recommending that the number of cycles applied (ie. its sensitivity) be reduced. But a person who has never had the virus will reliably test negative. You can check that PCR testing was effective by looking at the curves; the PCR positivity rate reliably predicted the hospital admission rate a week later, and the covid death rate a week after that. And those covid death peaks are reflected in the “death from all causes” statistics, proving that they are not an artefact of testing.
You are right there were death peaks in the “pandemic” year, but the overall death rate for that year was within normal parameters, the pandemic merely advanced deaths of elderly people by a few months and once they had died, the death rate dropped. Thus the overall rate was normal. The average age of death from covid is 82 yrs.
Kate, I’m seeing the same handful of names in your posts as I’ve seen throughout the pandemic. Peter McCullough. Mike Yeadon (on ConWom), who predicted that there could be no second wave, right before the second wave. Steve Kirsch, who claimed high vaccine death rates a year ago – a year before this latest scare about “five months delay”.
As yet we do not know what is causing this increase in the death rate. I suspect it is a delayed effect of infection with covid, combined with the overload of health services and delays to treatment caused by the pandemic. But if it turns out to be vaccines it will be in the scientific literature soon; I have seen no reason to suspect that almost the entire medical and scientific communities (apart from a tiny handful of mavericks) have turned into murderers.
Ah, you’ve changed tack, have you? At first it was just an artefact of testing, but since that fallacy was demolished it’s now real deaths, but just old people who don’t matter, right?
Hark at yourself!
Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Cardiac Imaging Findings in 118 Studies
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006062/Richard Ennos (professor) studies, er, pine trees:
https://www.ed.ac.uk/profile/richard-ennos
So why even refer to him as a professor in this context except to create a false impression of scientific authority?
Kate, Myocarditis is a known problem (a fairly minor one) with some of the covid vaccines.
You can’t go claiming a huge medical conspiracy to kill people (“First, if you believe that the health authorities have acted in good faith during the pandemic…”, here), and then go citing proper vaccine vigilance by the scientific and medical communities in the mainstream scientific literature – well, not at least with any intellectual honesty.
Grief. Can we add basic scientific literacy to the school syllabus please? And a ban on “Scientists say that by the year 3000 all men will have big willies” stories in the corporate media? I’m not getting paid for all this effort.
- The topic ‘Concerns about the contents of the covid vaccines’ is closed to new replies.