- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I’m watching the inquiry footage and I’ve noticed several interesting things. I’d like to hear your thoughts about these things? And what other things of note have you noticed in the inquiry oral evidence?
1. There were photos shown of the perfume bottle visible on the kitchen worktop with other stull around. But the image was redacted by a black square over the face of the bottle so that you could not read the brand Nina Ricci. But a few images later they display a close up image of the bottle which has no redactions with the brand name clearly visible. Any ideas why they redacted the brand name on the other images?
2. They show CCTV of the Skripals walking to and sitting down on the bench. So they obviously have CCTV showing them gradually becoming more sick until they pass out, and the first responders attending. Why have we not seen that? (from footage dated 28 Oct 2024)
3. Ross Cassidy says that Skripal told him “Putin will get me”, but in thew inquiry he says Skrpial was not talking to him, he only overheard a phrase when Skripal was talking with others. Why not have those other people that Skripal was actually talking to appear and confirm? (from footage dated 28 Oct 2024).
4. In footage of 29 Oct 2024 an officer says the fire brigade came to decontaminate the bench scene to remove vimit and blood. Where did the blood come from? Were there injuries that caused bleeding? I don’t recall bleeding or injuries being discussed.
5. Colonel McCourt will not give oral evidence. Very suspicious. The reason given is due to her mental state and accusations of her being involved in a conspiracy. I don’t buy that excuse. And I think her not appearing will increase such suspicion.
