- This topic has 37 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 days, 3 hours ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Voter turnout, 2018-2022
“The elections of 2018, 2020 and 2022 were three of the highest-turnout U.S. elections of their respective types in decades. About two-thirds (66%) of the voting-eligible population turned out for the 2020 presidential election – the highest rate for any national election since 1900. The 2018 election (49% turnout) had the highest rate for a midterm since 1914. Even the 2022 election’s turnout, with a slightly lower rate of 46%, exceeded that of all midterm elections since 1970.”
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/voter-turnout-2018-2022/
Excel chart:
“2016, 2018, 2020 and 2022 Voter demographics, based on validated voters”
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JKd0lNwopBqXpDglgvkrlqWgbTvsNNNSaWVtj-EkLJs/edit#gid=970549130(since the forum is the spot for NUMBERS and STATS)
My most recent post on Russiagate got lost. But this is an update by “FOIA Undead” made since including the documents.
He says following:
“(…)
We’re finally here. The culmination of years of work, hundreds of FOIA requests, countless hours of research.This week we have oral arguments in the Georgia Supreme Court. I think there is a legitimate possibility a ruling comes within 8-10 weeks.
(…)”.https://undeadfoia.substack.com/p/update-and-docs
with 2 new documents (#1 1600 pages #2 900 pages):
“Keromytis Emails”
https://sleuthscorner.docdroid.com/QUhxmmJ/22-fr-0725-may-2024-release-redacted-pdf
“Contracts”
https://sleuthscorner.docdroid.com/Qjg194j/23-f-0055-may-2024-rolling-response-redacted-2-pdf“(…)
Meanwhile, we have a running clock in two other FOIA lawsuits.It’s clear as it has been for years that the hack of the DNC was spoofed, and evidence for attribution was fabricated in order to create a receptive environment for the Steele dossier and other claims that Clinton wanted to push.
The same cyber researchers behind the Alfa Bank hoax were relied on for attribution. The same Special Counsel Mueller we were told was completely above-board and neutral used those same cyber researchers. Is that why the Mueller team wiped all their phones?
How much do they know? Do they know they were duped? Is something even more nefarious lurking?
Is our government complicit, or, have they merely fought to protect the covert cyber operations and classified data collection and mining programs that these guys are integral to, not just for the United States but also friendly foreign governments?
How much was Neustar on board with? Was there a secret negotiation with Clinton to restore the NPAC contract with her victory?
With a win in any of work, we will finally start getting some answers.
A loss resets the clock and means years of more litigation.
These basic questions deserve answers, but the disinformation campaign has been so effective that nobody has dared to step out of line.
It’s a damn shame that it’s fallen to a random citizen journalist to pursue the biggest story in history.
Here are the documents from recent productions. As usual, redactions with be fought later.
(…)”p.s.
It is interesting to observe how this unfolds. 2.5 years ago not knowing anything about Substack I assumed – judging by the site’s design (skull and all that) – that this is nonsense. Of course it isn’t but I had to learn a few things before. Happy I did keep an open mind. Initially assuming that with Wikileaks this kind of knowledge had disappeared. But Assange and his closest supporters did make a lasting impact. Not only by publishing documents. But, more importantly, influencing and altering the structure of thought and analysis. Adding a new depth of scrutiny to this line of work.Undead FOIA with hopeful news on his case against Antonakakis:
” Major Win
Today we had oral arguments in the Georgia Supreme Court. It may be presumptuous to call it a win, but every indication is that we scored a crushing win and we will be remanded back to the trial court for discovery.
The Justices did not offer any challenging questions for my excellent attorney, largely agreeing with her arguments while simultaneously expressing skepticism at the arguments the Antonakakis team made. I think Mr. Randles did a fine job — but the facts just aren’t on their side.
30 years of case law and the plain statutory language shows I did everything properly when requesting records from Antonakakis and they are liable for his non-compliance.
In a case where I was sanctioned nearly $54,000 by the trial court, there is every indication that we just won the case. That’s a Hollywood story and never what I expected. The case will likely be cited for the next 30 years, it’ll be nice to be on the winning side of that.
We advanced the Open Records law, and more importantly are back in the fight with two years of planning on what to do next.
We are ready to go another 15 rounds.”
https://undeadfoia.substack.com/p/major-winNew documents from RACKET:
“FOIA Library: Clemson University
The raw FOIA disclosures provided by Clemson University, highlighting the efforts of the Media Forensics Hub”by James Rushmore
Jul 11, 2024″https://www.racket.news/p/foia-library-clemson-university
with links to “250+ pages of our FOIA productions pertaining to Clemson University’s Media Forensics Hub”FOIA with info on upcoming content and revelations:
https://undeadfoia.substack.com/p/collab-coming
“(…)
we did get documents unexpectedly back on a FOIA that contained a significant development that validates much of what we have been reporting for a long time.It’s significant enough that I’ll be collaborating with a more established journalist to produce a story in the coming days. I should be able to cross-post it here.
(…)
and also getting bombshell information out to the masses
(…)”Lets wait and see…
May be someone could contact wikispooks.com and ask them to correct their claim about Craig Murray:
Their article on RUSSIAGATE has this paragraph:“(…)
Alternative media have solidly shown that the files were downloaded to a USB[citation needed], not hacked online; that the whistleblower probably was DNC insider Seth Rich[citation needed], who later were shot and killed in an alleged robbery; and Craig Murray has stated that he personally transferred the files from the whistleblower to WikiLeaks[citation needed].
(…)”
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Russiagate(I have not checked other entries there concerning Craig, or Assange.)
“FOIA Files: Did Special Counsel Robert Mueller Rely on Clinton Campaign Operatives to Point to Russia?”
FOIA documents show the Mueller probe may have been informed by a Pentagon agency.
https://www.racket.news/p/foia-files-did-special-counsel-robert
https://archive.is/MvoOTSeems like the elite trying to “prepare” for Irangate…
Trump election campaign accuses Iran of hacking attack
Claim comes amid reports of foreign efforts to interfere in US presidential election.Microsoft
Iran seeks to meddle in US elections – Microsoft
The company claims to have discovered hackers and fake news sites linked to Tehranhttps://swentr.site/news/602395-microsoft-iran-election-meddling/
Google
Iran tried to hack Trump and Biden-Harris campaigns – Google
The tech giant says it disrupted a phishing operation by a hacking unit linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corpshttps://swentr.site/news/602638-google-iran-trump-biden-hack/
Funny, I have not ever, not once, seen Google, Microsoft finding US malicious actors trying to influence any election. I remember when these companies simply sold PC computers but I realize now they have been turned into some political organisation, apparently.
Tonight 6:30 ET – Matt Taibbi and FOIA Undead in conversation:
“Who Determined Russia Hacked the DNC?
A discussion with UndeadFOIA, who will help explain the import of newly produced documents that raise questions about the origin story of Russiagate.”From the comment section of Racket News post:
Twitter Spaces Tonight at 6:30 ET: Who Determined Russia Hacked the DNC?
A discussion with UndeadFOIA, who will help explain the import of newly produced documents that raise questions about the origin story of Russiagate.Matt Taibbi
Aug 15, 2024
https://www.racket.news/p/twitter-spaces-tonight-at-630-et/commentsby Roger Stone:
“(…)
The FBI admitted during pretrial motions in my case that they never examined the computer servers of the DNC relying entirely on a quote report from crowd strikes, which claimed that there was an online hack of the DNC by Russian intelligence. The judge specifically denied that report to my defense attorneys at trial. Only later did we learn Crowdstrikes head of cyber security, Sean Henry, who just happened to be a former deputy to FBI director Robert Mueller testified that his “draft report” actually contained no proof that the Russians hacked the DNC.The judge strictly prohibited the testimony, Bill Binney , or the introduction of forensic evidence that would have approved that there was no online hack of the DNC.
Federal prosecutor Jonathan Kravis filed a ” sur reply” with the court in my case, claiming the government had evidence that the Russians had hacked the DNC beyond the crowd strikes report, which was a fraud upon the court. In fact, the intelligence agencies have no proof whatsoever hacking of the DNC.(…)”
answer by UndeadFOIA Sleuth News:
“(…)
There are several key facts surrounding your case I need to revisit. If memory serves we got to see search warrants for Guccifer 2.0’s Twitter account and other key investigative steps that came in 2017 and 2018, much later than one might have expected.I think the key point to our recent reporting is, if the totality of evidence supporting the hack & attribution outside of Crowdstrike comes from these other Clinton operatives, everyone should be concerned.
(…)”* * *
by Postimpressionist:
“(…)
Crowdstrike on DNC Russian computer hack: Before Congress:“We did not have concrete evidence” that alleged Russian hackers actually took the emails from DNC servers. “There’s circumstantial evidence, but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated,” Henry testified that CrowdStrike did not in fact know if such a theft occurred at all:
I believe it was an inside job by a Democrat and perhaps Seth Rich, as he was offed supposedly by a robber who didn’t take his wallet or watch with no further investigation. Now we find they just got his Computer from the FBI but it was selectivelly cleaned.
(…)”Obviously Seth Rich is still regarded as a viable explanation. UndeadFOIA would disagree as far as I know.
Ray McGovern would not. But McGovern´s expertise lies in another area I would assume.WaPo´s Philip Bump called RFK´s comment on TWITTER FILES nonsense.
Matt Taibbi with a crisp, short and swift response to the smearing, here:https://www.racket.news/p/note-to-philip-bump
https://archive.is/f2diBAG, Craig posted about Seth Rich back in January 2020, with scans of redacted FBI emails:
– The FBI Has Been Lying About Seth Rich
http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/01/the-fbi-has-been-lying-about-seth-rich/
You might also find some clues in the comments. I’m not following this closely; I’ve been convinced for years that ‘Russiagate’ was a hoax, and I’m not too concerned about whatever precise cloak-and-dagger shenanigans went on behind the scenes. Nearly all Western top level political and legal institutions have become so corrupt as to be entirely unfit for purpose. I’m more interested in how it can be changed.
Looks like US try to sanction every american connected to russian media like RT, Sputnik etc:
Scott Ritter Says Ending Cooperation With RT, Sputnik Due to US Sanctions
Political Witch Hunt: US Activists Go to Trial in Florida, Accused of Acting as Russian Agents
US becoming ‘neoliberal dictatorship’ – Moscow
https://swentr.site/news/603538-us-neoliberal-dictatorship-russia/
