Ukraine (after 2023)

[AG]

Tatyana

Thanks likewise.

Since I am not as tech-savvy as you are I don´t yet know about that translation thing.
I use a couple of browsers among them Yandex but without such plug-in. I have to find a solution for that now.

p.s. Attention: the guy Maté talks to from TIME is insane. This is the reason why we are well marching into a certain direction. And Maté fails us there. The guy however gets worse on Halpers questions.
See for yourself.

Oh and I feel he just lies very often (but you can judge that much better!).

I have noted a few points of the Eva Bartlett – Jacques Baud video on Donbas pre-2022 a situation which Maté and Shuster (TIME) talk about too:

JACQUES BAUD: NATO THREATENED RUSSIA DECADES BEFORE 2022
27/10/2024
https://rumble.com/v5fjhrh-jacques-baud-nato-threatened-russia-decades-before-2022.html

TC – 21:00 Crimea no green men
TC – 33:00 no human rights for minorities
TC – 42:00 UKR said officially 2015 no RU Army in Donbas
TC – 49:00 Z´s decree 24/3/2021 to conquer South and the Donbas and that led to SMO
TC – 51:00 never separatism only autonomy

p.p.s. And since you are an engineer by heart and may be training too, I don´t know, this odd American may be interesting: The video is 1 year old (think Oreshnik)

“Testing the US Military’s Worst Idea”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_n1FZaKzF8&t=225s

He displays an odd incompetence in the preparation of his trials, I found. May be intentionally however to make the show more inteesting.

A pop cultural reference from 10 years ago (which the guy above mentions by title):
“G.I. Joe” (2013)
Project Zeus’s Demonstration
2:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlrA-vPOGVQ

“None of the fallout, all of the fun”

Andrei Martyanov has some comments too:

“(…)
Kovalchuk, the Director of Kurchatov Institute:

Translation: MOSCOW, November 27 — RIA Novosti. The materials that Russia has that can withstand ultra-high temperatures made it possible to create the Oreshnik system and will make it possible to create other types of hypersonic weapons, said Mikhail Kovalchuk, president of the Kurchatov Institute National Research Center. The Oreshnik was demonstrated the other day. Why did we do this, why did we overtake everyone? Because we are one of the five world leaders. <…> We have created hypersonic weapons in a short period of time. And these are materials that used to work at 1,500 degrees, then at 1,800, and these at 2,000, and we did it, while others did not,” Kovalchuk told Izvestia on the sidelines of the IV Congress of Young Scientists, which is taking place in the federal territory of Sirius. According to him, the next step should be materials that can withstand 2,500-3,000 degrees. “Other materials that can withstand high temperatures will make it possible to create even more advanced weapons. The next step should be materials that can withstand 2500-3000 degrees,” Kovalchuk said.
https://ria.ru/20241127/oreshnik-1986100595.html
(…)”

Martyanov himself goes on:

“(…)
I explained the difference between hypersonic and ICBMs so many times on this blog, that I am really tired repeating it, for the last time:
1. ICBM MIRVs are in the atmosphere for a very short time–seconds really;
2. Hypersonic weapons are weapons which are capable:
a) of flying IN the atmosphere, maneuver in it and be controlled, all that is for many minutes.
b) that is why Oreshnik, while being a ballistic missile (on the booster phase) delivers warheads (either inert, loaded with conventional explosives or 900 kT nuke) into their maneuver phase after which they maneuver at some atmospheric high elevation and then DIVE. Practically same routine as Kinzhal. Imagine 36 Kinzhals flying at you at once. The whole world saw it. Nobody in the world (except Russia) has a technology to intercept it. These weapons are called quasi ballistic weapons.
c) Other hypersonic weapons, such as 3M22 Zircon conduct fully powered flight within atmosphere for minutes and arrive to the target under own propulsion.
3. Russia already has MIRVs which are powered and also can maneuver for ICBMs such as RS-28 Sarmat. And then there are gliding maneuvering block such as Avangard which have unlimited range, fly with M=27+ and maneuver.
(…)”

Moon of Alabama:

“(…)
November 27, 2024
How The New Russian Missiles Are Changing The Game

To describe a weapon system as a game changer on the battlefield is always open to be ridiculed. Many of the weapon systems that have been delivered to Ukraine were called game changing but failed to make any difference in the outcome of that war.

So why did I call the new Russian Oreshnik missile a ‘game changer’?

There are several reasons.(…)”

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/11/how-the-new-russian-missiles-are-changing-the-game.html#more

[Author]

Posts